RE: Westfield Mazda SDV

RE: Westfield Mazda SDV

Wednesday 22nd November 2006

Westfield Mazda SDV

Graham Bell tries a new sports car made with bits of an old sports car.


Westfield Mazda SDV
Westfield Mazda SDV

For the past 20 years or so most UK kit car manufacturers have based their front-engined rear-wheel drive single donor vehicle kits around Ford cars, initially the Mk1/2 Escort, then the Mk3/4/5 Cortina and finally the Sierra.

However, with Ford going completely front wheel drive in 1993 and even Sierras now something of a rarity, it was only a matter of time before the industry was forced to look for alternatives – not that there are many to choose from.

BMW is one obvious possibility, especially with the 3-Series being so common, but Westfield decided that the best base for its latest SDV (single donor vehicle) model was Mazda’s Mk1 MX5.

Available Mazda

Besides still being readily available, Mazda’s little roadster has always been highly rated as a driver’s car, so there’s also a sound logic in using parts originally designed for one lightweight sports car to make another lightweight sports car.

none
none
none
none
none
none
none
1.8-based Westfield (above)
1.8-based Westfield (above)
none
none
none
1.6-based Westfield
1.6-based Westfield

As you’ve probably guessed from the pictures, aside from the source of its mechanical parts, Westfield’s Mazda SDV is essentially the same Seven-inspired roadster it’s been making since 1986.

The most obvious visual clue to the Mazda version is the dashboard, which combines a curvy GRP panel with the MX5’s instrument pod to produce a more stylish and far cheaper alternative to the usual flat panel with aftermarket instruments.

Westfield aficionados might also notice the MX5 front uprights and hubs instead of Westfield’s usual custom alloy items, with the brakes being MX5 too rather than Ford, while at the rear the diff, driveshafts, uprights and brakes also come courtesy of Mazda.

The steering rack is Westfield’s own as fitted to its established models, though in this car it’s controlled via a Mazda steering column that affords the rare luxuries (by Westfield standards) of self-cancelling indicators and intermittent wipe.

Talking of electrical stuff, further useful savings on build costs are made by using the MX5 wiring loom, though it does require some modifications to adjust various wire lengths and remove others for electric windows etc that the Westfield doesn’t need.

Not surprisingly the chassis is essentially the same, well-proven square-tube spaceframe that Westfield has been using for some 20 years now, with just a few slight modifications to accommodate the MX5 bits.

Likewise the all-round coilover and wishbone suspension is the same as for existing models apart from minor mods to suit the Mazda bits.

1.8 is best?

Although Westfield’s initial plan was to base the car purely on the early 1600cc MX5, once it was launched people inevitably started to ask if you could build it using parts from the later 1800cc model. The short answer was no, because there were a number of differences that precluded it. However, as customer demand was obviously there, Westfield did the only logical thing and re-engineered the car so that it can be built using either version.

Something else some people who’d tried the original blue 1600 car asked for was more room under the steering wheel because, while it’s fine for average height slim types, larger drivers found it too close to their legs.

Consequently Westfield’s new red 1800 SDV demonstrator with the re-engineered chassis has the steering wheel an inch higher, and while this certainly provides more legroom it’s still not a car for the seriously large.

Westfield’s narrow high-back seats were clearly never designed for over-indulgent pie-eaters, while even with my average height I had the seat virtually back to the bulkhead, so I think anyone much over six feet tall will find it too cramped. And those who do fit still have to cope with a lack of space in the traditionally Seven-esque footwell, making narrow footwear the order of the day.

Classic bum-on-floor

The driving position is of course the classic race-car style ‘bum on floor’ job and looking through that heated screen down the long bonnet to the road ahead provides a stirring view that has you itching to fire it up and get on with it.

When Mazda was developing the MX5, it apparently went to great lengths to come up with an exhaust system that gave just the right note. Westfield by contrast simply hooked up its standard silencer to Mazda’s exhaust manifold and ended up with something that sounds better than any MX5 I’ve ever heard, the resultant deep throb sounding like it’s coming from something rather more potent than a standard spec, small capacity four pot.

Don’t know what lengths Mazda went to developing the MX5’s gearchange, but it has a beautiful short, precise throw that’s a delight to use and is perfectly suited to the sort of spirited driving a Westfield is designed for – as are the Shropshire roads not far from Westfield’s HQ.

Getting out of Birmingham (or more accurately, getting lost in Birmingham) showed that Westfield’s Mazda SDV is fuss-free and easy to drive in city traffic – apart from along some of Brum’s more appalling roads, which produced lots of jolting, rattling and banging from the front suspension.

Once finally out on Shropshire’s winding country roads it soon became obvious that the suspension has been set on the soft side to provide a comfortable ride, and for the most part it copes well with the sort of surfaces you generally find in the Westfield’s natural rural habitat.

Avoid speed humps

However, when pressing on along one particularly bumpy, undulating lane the Westy bottomed out rather noticeably, while as I discovered on the way to the photo location, if you really don’t want to hear nasty scraping noises you definitely need to avoid speed humps.

When it comes to performance, the 1800 engine obviously produces more power than the 1600 (130bhp as opposed to 118) but it also comes with a weight penalty, resulting in a kerb weight of 585kg compared to 545kg for the 1600 car.

Consequently any performance gain is likely to be negligible, and having driven both versions – albeit several weeks apart - the 1600 certainly felt just as quick on the road. Quick enough on a couple of occasions to get past a whole line of A-road dawdlers in one go by dropping it into third and revving the willing little twin cam round to the red line, and I can well believe Westfield’s claim of 0-60 in just 5.5 seconds.

Nimble handling

But it’s on quiet country lanes devoid of dawdlers and where nimble handling counts for more that brute power that cars like this really shine.

Westfield’s steering is very light and extremely responsive to driver input, which combined with those visible front mudguards makes it easy to place the front end of the car exactly where you want it.

When it comes to knocking excess speed off for a tight or blind bend the unservoed brake pedal is nicely weighted, so that while it requires quite a firm shove to make those MX5 brakes work hard it requires an extremely firm shove to lock them up.

A quick flick of that stubby gear lever will then instantly have you in a lower gear so that you can keep that revvy little twin cam on the boil through the bend, with the car’s responsive steering and agility making it easy to adjust your line if necessary.

The standard MX5 size 185/60x14 tyres seem well up to coping with the modest power and light weight, so nailing the throttle out of the bend isn’t likely to get the tail out, just accelerate you quickly towards the next bend so you can do it all again.

And you’ll be doing it with a silly grin on your face.

A lot of fun

This car really is a lot of fun, and if you fancy building one, any Mk1 ‘pop-up’ headlights MX5 from 1990 to 1998 can be used, though Westfield recommends using a pre-95 model so that you don’t have to fit a catalytic converter.

Even with cars of this age, Japanese reliability means the chances are that the mechanical parts will still have plenty of life in them as evidenced by Westfield’s demonstrators. Apart from a basic service, the engines in both cars are just as they came out of high mileage donor vehicles (120,000 for the 1600 and 90,000 for the 1800) and both are still running good as new.

In fact as far as I can see, the only disadvantage to using the MX5 as a donor vehicle is that it’s never likely to reach the ‘50 quid banger’ status of old Fords, with even the earliest versions still selling for over a grand because they’re usually still so usable.

The obvious solution is to use a damaged example, with these being available for under £500, less whatever you can get for any usable body or trim parts you don’t need.

Excellent value

With Westfield’s complete MX5 SDV kit costing £6,450 that means you could build one of these cars for under £7,000, while Westfield’s name and pedigree should guarantee a straightforward build and good resale price too.

That’s damn good value for this sort of toy – which let’s face it is essentially what this type of car is - and judging by how little the fuel gauge in the 1600 went down during my drive it should even be cheap to run.

So who needs old Sierras anyway?

© Copyright Graham Bell 2006

Author
Discussion

VladD

Original Poster:

7,855 posts

265 months

Wednesday 22nd November 2006
quotequote all
Soon there'll be no RWD donors left for cars like this. Don't BMWs have trans-axles, making them impossible to use on a 7?

gooby

9,268 posts

234 months

Wednesday 22nd November 2006
quotequote all
Christmas pressie ?!?!

phrich

549 posts

223 months

Wednesday 22nd November 2006
quotequote all
Not really comparable but interesting still the same.

www.holden.com.au/www-holden/action/conceptcar?modelid=20008

horton

804 posts

252 months

Wednesday 22nd November 2006
quotequote all
two things spring to mind when reading this:

1. The MX5 is a nice car anyway, it seems a little wrong to kill a car worthy of a rebuild, even when its to make a much nicer car.

2. Seeing the amount of aftermarket tuning available for the MX5 engine, this could be built as a standard NA car, then later on fitted with one of the tried and tested Turbo kits, thus turning it into a 550kg/200bhp+ monster.

Drakuul

13 posts

209 months

Wednesday 22nd November 2006
quotequote all
It's not necessary to kill an MX5, the one they used for the factory demonstrator had seriously rotted bodywork - find one that's just failed its MOT on bodywork, snap it up and gut it for a Westie that won't ever get rusted bodywork.

I've got the V8 Westfield and will be building one of the MX5-power cars over the winter.

Road_Terrorist

5,591 posts

242 months

Wednesday 22nd November 2006
quotequote all
VladD said:
Don't BMWs have trans-axles, making them impossible to use on a 7?


BMWs have a conventional drivetrain, I can't think of any that had a transaxle except maybe the exotic stuff like M1.


Pat H

8,056 posts

256 months

Wednesday 22nd November 2006
quotequote all
What a super car.

Seven type cars deserve a twin cam.

I'd quite like one.

drink

sjg

7,452 posts

265 months

Wednesday 22nd November 2006
quotequote all
horton said:
1. The MX5 is a nice car anyway, it seems a little wrong to kill a car worthy of a rebuild, even when its to make a much nicer car.


MX5s are mechanically tough but the bodywork can rust badly. My boss recently spent several hundred pounds getting hers attended to (uneconomical IMO, but hey) and there's plenty more out there that are failing MOTs unless plenty of money is spent on them.

They're not exactly rare these days and there's quite a few about that have been neglected - tired/damaged leaking hoods causing mouldy interiors. I'd rather see most of their bits used as a donor for something like this (far more of them than the Sierra kits too) than being another car bound for the crusher.

fuoriserie

4,560 posts

269 months

Wednesday 22nd November 2006
quotequote all
Nice idea using the mx5 donor, excellent reliability and easy to mantain, but it does need a new body....

andy.shent

73 posts

227 months

Wednesday 22nd November 2006
quotequote all
What is needed now is the government to give some sort of tax incentive to encourage this type of build..... Not only are most of the bits being recycled but as stated in the blog, the MPG was excellant!


Never happen tho!!!!

midnightDriver

118 posts

228 months

Wednesday 22nd November 2006
quotequote all
gooby said:
Christmas pressie ?!?!

My sentiments exactly!!!! An ingenious example of recycling,....did get me thinkin tho.....wot other engines/driventrains can westfield recycle?? Can you jus bring any old car to westfield and ask them to work their magic?

S works

10,166 posts

250 months

Wednesday 22nd November 2006
quotequote all
I wonder if some of the aftermarket tuning options for the MX5 engines will fit. Turbo/Supercharged version anyone

fat richie

1,271 posts

218 months

Wednesday 22nd November 2006
quotequote all
Nice thinking by Westfield - now all they need to do is build a Lotus Elan replica using the Mazda running gear! beer

CTE

1,488 posts

240 months

Thursday 23rd November 2006
quotequote all
What a brilliant idea. How ironic would that be....Mazda essentially copy Lotus, but then the Mazda is used to creat the car it copied!!

Steve Maund

436 posts

231 months

Thursday 23rd November 2006
quotequote all
I drove one at the factory a couple of weeks, I think it was the 1.6!
I'm used to a 230bhp Westfield and am building a 5 Litre V8 in February, but found the MX5 donored car a great packagae for the money. The gearbox is one of the best I have ever used, the engine could do with more power, but getting a turbo or supercharger from the States is not expensive.

The only thing I would change is the steering wheel, way too big!!!!!

t40ora

5,177 posts

219 months

Thursday 23rd November 2006
quotequote all
S works said:
I wonder if some of the aftermarket tuning options for the MX5 engines will fit. Turbo/Supercharged version anyone


I know the MX5 expert used by Westfield on this project and he says that a standard blower of either sort will not fit in the engine bay.

iamthestig

13,107 posts

212 months

Thursday 23rd November 2006
quotequote all
Road_Terrorist said:
VladD said:
Don't BMWs have trans-axles, making them impossible to use on a 7?


BMWs have a conventional drivetrain, I can't think of any that had a transaxle except maybe the exotic stuff like M1.




Got given a dead Alfa 75 3.0l that had a transaxle as do Porsche 944's not not really what you'd call exotic stuff anymore.

BoRED S2upid

19,691 posts

240 months

Thursday 23rd November 2006
quotequote all
Just had a quick look on e-bay, lots of usable MX5s on there:

http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/1993-MAZDA-MX-5

twin40s

153 posts

255 months

Thursday 23rd November 2006
quotequote all
There's no reason a 7 can't use a transaxle as long as its pretty compact.

The Westfield FW400 used a Hewland transaxle. Elite make a transaxle suitable
for 7s, seen it fitted to a modified Westfield chassis

dinkel

26,938 posts

258 months

Thursday 23rd November 2006
quotequote all
Brilliant idea indeed.

What about a Toyota MR2 donor?

A bit of pep and the car gets a nicer soundbyte and a bit more beef.

130 from the 1.6 would be easy I guess . . . Who needs torque in a lightweight anyways.