RE: Mercedes Benz SLR McLaren

RE: Mercedes Benz SLR McLaren

Friday 21st November 2003

Mercedes Benz SLR McLaren

More pics of the monstrous motor


It seems like the new Mercedes-Benz SLR McLaren has been on the verge of being launched for a long time now. Today Mercedes issued a new set of pictures and information and it's now safe to assume that the supercar has finally arrived.

The two-seater, with its striking "swing-wing" doors and styling elements borrowed from the Formula 1 Silver Arrows, attempts to build on the legacy of the famous SLR race cars of the 1950s. Equipped with cutting-edge race car technology and ground-breaking new Mercedes developments is sure to create a stir wherever it goes. The prolonged bonnet will capture attention if nothing else!

The newly developed V8 supercharged engine delivers a handy 626bhp which can launch the SLR to 60mph in just 3.8 seconds. The top speed is approximately 207mph!

The body is made from carbon fibre composites giving it the capacity for immense energy absorption - handy if you bin it.

Safety

The SLR is the world's first series-produced car to have a front crash structure manufactured entirely from carbon fibre. Adaptive airbags, newly developed 'kneebags' and sidebags, belt tensioners, high-performance ceramic brake discs and an automatically adaptive airbrake in the boot lid round off the range of safety equipment on board.

Mercedes-Benz has introduced new material technology to the manufacture of the brake discs too. They are made from fibre-reinforced ceramic and giving high fade-resistance and a very long life. Not only that but they will stop the car rather quickly too.

That Bonnet

Whilst it may seem a little out of proportion, the reasoning behind the lengthy engine bay is to ensure that the engine sits behind the front wheels - a set up MB call a "front mid-engined design".

The dry sumped 5.5-litre motor is supercharged to give the 600+ brake and an enormous 575 lb-ft of torque – a figure which remains constant across a broad engine speed range of up to 5000 rpm. It's an attribute that helps the SLR reach 300km/h in 28.8 seconds!

The 5-speed automatic transmission, fitted as standard, is also designed for high performance. It allows the driver to choose between three programs with different shift characteristics. When "Manual" is selected, the five gears can either be shifted using buttons on the steering wheel or using the selector lever's Touchshift function. In this mode the driver can also select between three shift stages – "Sport", "SuperSport" and "Race" – significantly shortening the shift times still further for an even sportier drive.

The Body

The body design of the Gran Turismo with the Mercedes star takes classical styling elements from the legendary SLR race cars of the 1950s

In order to meet the highest of standards in terms of handling at top speed, directional stability and the cooling air requirements necessary for high-performance cars of this kind, Mercedes-Benz worked with McLaren on developing the aerodynamics. Following extensive wind-tunnel tests, the Mercedes-Benz SLR McLaren was given a virtually smooth underbody with a special six-channel diffusor under the rear. Both features are familiar design principles from Formula 1. They ensure that the airflow beneath the vehicle is virtually unimpeded and that negative lift, or downforce, is produced at higher speeds. The distinctive sidepipes on each side of the vehicle are also the result of the aerodynamic requirements. A conventional exhaust gas system would have disrupted the smooth line of the underbody.

At the rear of the SLR an adaptive spoiler provides additional downforce. From a speed of 59mph, it automatically adopts a 10-degree position, increasing the contact pressure at the rear axle. The spoiler also doubles as an airbrake: when the driver brakes heavily, it rises to an angle of 65 degrees, not only ensuring increased aerodynamic drag but also shifting the aerodynamic centre further towards the rear.

Inside

Individually padded carbon-frame seats, a multifunction steering wheel with race-car-type buttons for manual gear selection, clearly arranged chronometer-style instruments and high-grade materials surround the driver of the SLR - making sure that they feel they've spent their money well!

Author
Discussion

t1grm

Original Poster:

4,655 posts

284 months

Friday 21st November 2003
quotequote all
Very nice. So how much, how many are they planning to make and when?

I think McLaren's road car efforts will always be eclipsed by the F1 although admittedly this car is trying to fulfill a totally different role.

Klassiekerrally

2,543 posts

255 months

Friday 21st November 2003
quotequote all
How many people really think this car is beautiful? (It's NOT!)

Rozza!!!

654 posts

276 months

Friday 21st November 2003
quotequote all
Its utterly ugly!!!

jumjum

347 posts

258 months

Friday 21st November 2003
quotequote all
I think it looks pretty good.

It's also hard as nails, look at this crash, vw trashed SLR hardly marked

www.iol.co.za/index.php?click_id=13&art_id=vn20031119015143625C721559&set_id=1

Nice in black

smele

1,284 posts

284 months

Friday 21st November 2003
quotequote all
That's because it's so ugly you couldn't tell if it had been in a crash or not.

stevenrt

141 posts

270 months

Saturday 22nd November 2003
quotequote all
I think it looks beautiful. The long nose is necessary to push the weight back as far as possible. They managed 49:51 front:rear, not bad for a front engine car but the new Ferrari Scalageti (or whatever it is called) manages 46:54 which is really remarkable for a front engine car.

Some (like Ferrari) maintain that this kind of rear bias weight distribution is ideal. Arguments for are perfect balance when braking into a corner and transient response (how the car behaves as you turn in) is critical, plus you get better traction powering out of a corner.

Lotus claim 50:50 is ideal, so it's interesting the Elise is 39:61!

BMW of course claim 50:50 is ideal. Personally I think the 45:55 balance makes more sense since I would rather have perfect handling breaking into a corner than during steady state cornering (when 50:50 is better). I think Lotus are just messing with people's heads!

tuffer

8,849 posts

267 months

Saturday 22nd November 2003
quotequote all
It's even more of a clowns shoe than the Z3M coupe thingy....and not a lot better than a Z4 (in the looks department).

granville

18,764 posts

261 months

Saturday 22nd November 2003
quotequote all
Of course, it's inexcusably vile but it matters little.

It must be akin to driving The Boer War.

Somebody like Daz needs to land himself one of these; a towering personality with a colossal appetite for recreational annexation.

I can just imagine the great man casually flinging one of these along Brunter's longest straight at 210 mph whilst simultaneously buying The North.

Hail.

dazren

22,612 posts

261 months

Monday 24th November 2003
quotequote all
derestrictor said:
Somebody like Daz needs to land himself one of these; a towering personality with a colossal appetite for recreational annexation.

Thanks for the sentiment DeR. However if I had this sort of dough I'd be turning up at Brunters and Pistonfest next year in a Carrera GT.

DAZ

thirsty

726 posts

264 months

Monday 24th November 2003
quotequote all
I am sure that this is one serious performing car.... but I haven't seen such an ugly nose since the Ford Edsel.

Hazzer

119 posts

269 months

Tuesday 25th November 2003
quotequote all
It looks great, I got to have a good look close up when I was at the Frankfurt Motor Show.

The team in the UK has done a very good job of putting the vehicle togeather to the required spec. If you have an interest in automotive engineering certain design aspects such as the castings, exhaust design and safety cell are very intersting how they have got round the problems posed by the package.

Oh and its f***ing fast aswell!

Haz

GregE240

10,857 posts

267 months

Wednesday 26th November 2003
quotequote all
Nice car and all that, but my E240 has the same pedals as that car. And its a darn sight cheaper. Much like the Maybach, far too much raiding of the parts bin has occured in the creation of this car and that cheapens it somewhat.

C'mon, if TVR and the like can make bespoke instrumentation at a fraction of what this car cost, then why can't a huge multinational like D-C follow suit?

The final nail in the coffin for me is that a fully loaded SL55 (delimited, bien sur) costs a fraction of the price of this car. With the SL55, you get an extremely capable 2 door coupe that becomes a roadster at the flick of a switch.

You could buy several SL55s in fact.

granville

18,764 posts

261 months

Wednesday 26th November 2003
quotequote all
Yeees, although I'm not sure your bling meter could cope!

golem

58 posts

257 months

Thursday 27th November 2003
quotequote all
I agree with the SL55 statement. The SLR is woefully ugly for a car of it's price. If they had to beat their car with an ugly stick to get 49/51, then they shouldn't have used such a heavy engine. Sorry, it just seems so contrived.

To me, the McLaren team were handed a set of specs, a set of parts they had to use to make it reach budget, and the result really reflects their talent but also the stupid specs they were handed. I imagine the McLaren team thought the project was a cruel joke. Much akin to something like: "We know you guys are good, so here's our accountants and marketers little list, make them happy."

They could have done better if Mac had of run it from the outset.

j_s_g

6,177 posts

250 months

Thursday 27th November 2003
quotequote all
Is it just me, or is this car lacking in "nationality"? It doesn't look like an imposing Merc such as the SL55. It reminds me of an American copy of a European design (and don't even start me on the wing mirrors! ).

wfg

43 posts

280 months

Wednesday 10th December 2003
quotequote all
Ugly? Maybe, but it looks better than the Enzo.

Kinky

39,542 posts

269 months

Friday 12th December 2003
quotequote all
One of our MB Club members happened upon the Top Gear team in SA test driving the car, with pics .....

http://mbclub.co.uk/forums/showthread.php?s=&threadid=4272

K

pinklispstick

6 posts

148 months

Saturday 17th December 2011
quotequote all
nice car!!

but for me, smart for two look nicer than this one, smart for two is too small but great design and mercedes parts.

Edited by pinklispstick on Tuesday 20th December 02:26

iluvmercs

7,541 posts

227 months

Saturday 17th December 2011
quotequote all
Bit of a thread resurrection, don't you think?
I don't think I've seen an SLR compared with a Smart Car!

Darren