RE: Driven: Continental Supersports Convertible

RE: Driven: Continental Supersports Convertible

Thursday 1st July 2010

Driven: Continental Supersports Convertible

Bentley unleashes the world's fastest four-seater on the world's slowest roads...



Twenty five miles an hour. That's about an eighth of the potential of Bentley's Supersports Convertible - a car the Crewe firm is claiming as the fastest four-seater drop-top you can buy with its 202mph v-max - and my maximum so far. I'm in Colorado, and despite 6.0-litres and 12 cylinders fed by twin turbochargers, and an output of 621bhp I've barely tickled the accelerator as I depart Telluride Mountain Village, Colorado, and head out to find the Million Dollar Highway.


I'd been told that much of the route was speed restricted and heavily enforced, and they weren't kidding. Still, the painfully long, 25mph maximum drive through Telluride Mountain Village's golf course - where golf buggies have priority - gives me an opportunity to enjoy the Supersport's gorgeous interior. Hand-stitched leather and chrome feature everywhere, while matte effect carbon fibre replaces wood, with the black weave covering everything from the dashboard to the seat backs.


Those seats are just lovely, they're manual and account for around 40kg of weight saving over a GTC Speed, but it's the snug fit and fine support that's got me sold. Who needs electric motors anyway? Find a position you like, easy, and stick with it. After all it's not like you're gonna be bunging lots of people the keys to your £178,000 ride. That's a lot of money, even for a Bentley, the Supersports topping the Continental price list and commanding £20,000 more than the already stupidly rapid GTC Speed.


Whether it's worth it isn't really the issue. At this level that jump isn't likely to be of significance to buyers, and could you really walk out of the showroom knowing you'd not ordered the fastest model? For the looks alone I'd struggle, the Supersports Convertible sharing the same more assertive styling of its coupe relative. Arguably they work better with the Convertible, the rear in particular looking fantastic. Thank the wider rear arches, with the flare on the wings covering a 50mm wider track. It's more obvious on the open-topped Superspeed, the flatter deck and lower roof - when it's up - accentuating the rear's additional width.


Up front the deeper vents add assertiveness, the dark metal finish where GTCs usually feature chrome adding to the visual menace. The GT might not be the newest car on the block, but in Supersports Convertible form it's still a serious head turner. And the locals have plenty time to look too, as I'm not going anywhere fast.

On the driveway there's the odd fluffed downshift, the ZF six-speeder evidently needing some heat through it before it's able to deal with the W12's mighty 800Nm (590lb.ft) of torque. It's developed from 2,000-4,500rpm, with peak power of 621bhp arriving at 6,000rpm. It's difficult to keep it at under 25mph, with just the merest tickle of the accelerator or slightest of gradients having it run up to the heady heights of 30mph and beyond.


Salvation lies in an increased limit at the end of the drive, where I can give the Supersports its head up to 50mph. From standstill. Pin the accelerator, wait a tiny moment as the transmission gathers up any slack and the Supersports launches forwards with alarming ease. It's fast, 62mph coming in 4.2 seconds (100mph in 9.6 secs), though I'm on the brakes well before that - my enthusiasm for speed tempered by the promise of ticketing cops and the hand cannons on their belts.


It all means I've plenty time to concentrate on the Bentley's other alterations. The suspension has been pretty comprehensively tweaked, with the wider track joined by stiffer roll bars, a 10mm drop in ride height (over the already dropped GTC Speed), 33% stiffer bushes and re-tuned damper control strategy. Combine that with 20-inch alloy wheels and an open top and you might think it's a recipe for a wobbly, stiff-riding disaster, but the Supersports Convertible rides with a suppleness that's surprising given its focus.


Thank less unsprung weight, with each wheel dropping 2.5kg and the Supersports' standard carbon brakes shifting 20kg overall. Even so, there's the very occasional knock though the suspension and an infinitesimal shimmy from the structure, but it's only apparent when crossing railroad tracks or the massive cracks in the road caused by geological shifts in this mountainous environment.

Did I mention we were high? Ten thousand feet up. The air's thin and it's hot. This might go some way to explaining why the Supersports Convertible doesn't feel as savagely rapid or sound quite as naughty as its coupe did when I drove it recently at sea level.


There's plenty of power, but it doesn't feel like it's got quite the poke to manage its 4.2 second 0-62mph time. Not here, and certainly not today. The engine's a touch less vocal. There's still a sound like someone's tearing the air behind you during foot-to-the-floor acceleration, but there's none of the glorious cackling and popping when you lift off. I'm blaming the environment, as that coupe experienced previously sounded fantastic and accelerated with alarming ferocity. It's still pretty far from but tardy. With switchback bends climbing and descending the beautiful Colorado mountains the Supersports reveals steering with greater feedback. There's not masses of feel, but there's more information at the wheel than any other Conti, and enough to allow you to place the nose with real confidence.


It feels more neutral too, with Bentley shifting the four-wheel drive's bias to the rear - with a 40/60 front/rear split. Revisions to the electronic systems also increases the thresholds of intervention, giving the Supersports' driver more control more of the time. Even in the slower - and that's 10mph signposted - bends there's a greater delicacy to the Supersports's controls. It delivers at speed too, as after too many miles of speedometer watching I forget the cops for a few moments and drive the Supersports how it should be.

Do so and it's crushingly competent. The turn in is sharp and the body remains flat as it sweeps round corners with impunity. The ZF 'box with heat through it and operated by the paddles shifts quickly and cleanly, the engine delivers its massive performance anytime and at any revs, while the massive brakes stop it effectively - though need a firm push to do so. There's real driver appeal here, the Supersports revealing talent that the Continental range has previously hidden under its layers of luxury.


It feels more youthful than any Continental before it, with only the clunky sat nav inside betraying its advancing years. Word is that a new Continental is coming sometime next year, too. If the Supersports previews how that might feel, then it's clear Bentley's got back its sporting mojo.

All with a conscience, too. If you care, the Supersports - and all 2011 model Bentleys - is 'green' too. It's able to drink E85 biofuel, assuming you can find a fuel station with it on its forecourt. Really, huge consumption is huge consumption whatever you put in its tank - the combined 17mpg figure unlikely ever to flash up on the trip computer. Unless you're prone to driving it everywhere at 25mph that is...



CONTINENTAL SUPERSPORTS CONVERTIBLE
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION

ENGINE
Capacity (cc) 5998
Cylinders W12
Aspiration Twin-turbocharged
Installation Front, longitudinal
Construction Alloy heads and block
Bore/Stroke 84.0/90.2 mm
Compression Ratio 9.0 : 1
Fuel E85 & 98 (95) RON
Valve gear Chain-driven DOHC per bank, 4 valves per cylinder,
cam phased inlet and outlet
Maximum Power 630PS/621 bhp/463 kW @ 6000 rev/min
Maximum Torque 800 Nm/590 lb ft @ 2000 to 4500 rev/min

TRANSMISSION
Type Continuous all-wheel drive with 40/60 rear bias
torque split & Torsen centre differential
Gearbox ZF 6-speed 'Quickshift' automatic
Ratios 1st: 4.172
2nd: 2.340
3rd: 1.521
4th: 1.143
5th: 0.867
6th: 0.691
Final Drive: 3.52:1 front / 3.52:1 rear

PERFORMANCE
Maximum Speed 202mph (325km/h)
0-60 mph 3.9 seconds
0-100 mph 9.6 seconds

0-100 km/h 4.2 seconds
0-160 km/h 9.5 seconds

SUSPENSION
Front Four-link double wishbones, anti-roll bar, air springs
Rear Trapezoidal multi-link, anti-roll bar, air springs
Dampers Continuous Damping Control with four adjustable settings

STEERING
Type Rack & pinion, power-assisted, speed-sensitive
Turns lock to lock 2.6
Turning circle 11.4 metres kerb-to-kerb

BRAKES
Front 420 mm diameter carbon/ceramic, vented & cross-drilled
Rear 356 mm diameter carbon/ceramic, vented & cross-drilled
Anti lock Standard with Electronic Stability Programme (ESP)
8.1 and Electronic Brake Force Distribution (EBD)

BODY & CHASSIS
Construction Steel monocoque, 2-door convertible
Length 4804 mm (189.1inches)
Width across mirrors 2194mm (86.4 inches)
Width mirrors folded 1945mm (76.6 inches)
Kerb weight 2395kg (5279lbs)
Height 1388mm (54.6 inches)
Wheelbase 2745mm (108.1 inches)
Front track 1623mm (63.9 inches)
Rear track 1657mm (65.2 inches)
Wheels 20inch x 9.5J 10-spoke Smoked Chrome Alloy
Tyres 275/35x20 Pirelli Ultra High Performance
Fuel tank capacity 90 litres (19.8 gallons/23.8 US gallons)

FUEL CONSUMPTION / EMISSIONS
Urban 11.1 mpg (25.5 litres / 100 km)
Extra Urban 24.3 mpg (11.6 litres / 100 km)
Combined 17.0 mpg (16.7 litres / 100km)
EPA Drive Cycle City Driving TBC
Highway Driving TBC
Carbon dioxide emissions 388g/km
Emission controls EU V and US Lev 11

Author
Discussion

ncow82

Original Poster:

99 posts

167 months

Thursday 1st July 2010
quotequote all
what is the point of having two more seats in the back if no one except tiny children and amputees could fit in?

Leicesterdave

2,282 posts

180 months

Thursday 1st July 2010
quotequote all
Yawn, Bentleys are very boring.

lionrampant

577 posts

190 months

Thursday 1st July 2010
quotequote all
I'm not a fan of that interior, doesn't look as upmarket as it should.

JumpinJack

404 posts

178 months

Thursday 1st July 2010
quotequote all
lionrampant said:
I'm not a fan of that interior, doesn't look as upmarket as it should.
I agree. Those seats look like they've been pulled out of a modified supra and given diamond stitching. However.... what a car! cloud9

Zod

35,295 posts

258 months

Thursday 1st July 2010
quotequote all
It's not quicker in figures than a Ferrari 612 and I'd put money on an Aston Rapide beating it around the Ring.

It looks like a truck (classic Bentley in that respect - the insult goes back to the 1920s), but worse than that, it weighs as much as a truck. What is the point of shaving a few kilos off the weight with carbon seats in a car that weighs 2.4 tonnes? Why can such a massive, heavy monster not have a bit of space in the back? Those rear seats look barely more accommodating than those in a DB9.


pilchardthecat

7,483 posts

179 months

Thursday 1st July 2010
quotequote all
A brand destroyed by the demographic of it's customers

FishFace

3,790 posts

208 months

Thursday 1st July 2010
quotequote all
Leicesterdave said:
Yawn, Bentleys are very boring.
On the same lines as you, I've never every taken to the car. Admittedly this remains in the land of theory as I've never been in one / driven one.

The problem for me is, every time I see one, I think "what else could I get for that money?"

irodger

1,112 posts

218 months

Thursday 1st July 2010
quotequote all
pilchardthecat said:
A brand destroyed by the demographic of it's customers
A company reinvented by the demographic of it's new customers.

Pointless car in my eyes, but kind of impressive at the same time. No doubt will be bought by plenty of footballers and rappers though.


soad

32,882 posts

176 months

Thursday 1st July 2010
quotequote all
I love it - would be my perfect choice as a GT cruiser.

OnTheOverrun

3,965 posts

177 months

Thursday 1st July 2010
quotequote all
pilchardthecat said:
A brand destroyed by the demographic of it's customers
Like BMW.

Ozzie Osmond

21,189 posts

246 months

Thursday 1st July 2010
quotequote all
An even more horrid version of a thoroughly horrid-looking car. What would inspire someone to part with more than £100k for one of these I don't understand. All personal tastes and choices I guess.

Envy? Oh dear Lord I hope not...

Oxygen2k10

332 posts

170 months

Thursday 1st July 2010
quotequote all
[quote=Ozzie Osmond]An even more horrid version of a thoroughly horrid-looking car. What would inspire someone to part with more than £100k for one of these I don't understand. quote]

Being depressed because you played crappy football for a few weeks and got sent home from the world cup early? Just a thought. rage

pilchardthecat

7,483 posts

179 months

Thursday 1st July 2010
quotequote all
OnTheOverrun said:
pilchardthecat said:
A brand destroyed by the demographic of it's customers
Like BMW.
Not really, BMWs were always owned by "c0cks"

Bentleys used to be sporty Rollers, they never used to be shiny nob-trinkets for chavs with money, celebrity horse masseurs and footballers

Wolfsbait

464 posts

210 months

Thursday 1st July 2010
quotequote all
Nonsense car and a write up so bland and devoid of insight I didn't even get to the end...

Isn't it time PH paid for some motoring journo's?


Twincam16

27,646 posts

258 months

Thursday 1st July 2010
quotequote all
pilchardthecat said:
OnTheOverrun said:
pilchardthecat said:
A brand destroyed by the demographic of it's customers
Like BMW.
Not really, BMWs were always owned by "c0cks"

Bentleys used to be sporty Rollers, they never used to be shiny nob-trinkets for chavs with money, celebrity horse masseurs and footballers
I think there are still 'proper' Bentleys to be had.

They're the ones that don't have 'Continental' in their name.

There's something far too 'VAG' about the Continental GT. Get rid of the Flying 'B' and stick four rings in the middle of its nondescript grille aperture and you'd have what looked like an A5 replacement with a chav quad-headlight 'conversion'.

At least the Mulsanne still fits the bill as a Bentley, as does the Brooklands.

Bill

52,690 posts

255 months

Thursday 1st July 2010
quotequote all
soad said:
I love it - would be my perfect choice as a GT cruiser.
I'm not sure about perfect, but the convertible is vastly better looking than the coupe.

Twincam16

27,646 posts

258 months

Thursday 1st July 2010
quotequote all
Wolfsbait said:
Nonsense car and a write up so bland and devoid of insight I didn't even get to the end...

Isn't it time PH paid for some motoring journo's?
I think Bentley tied their own hands with this one by launching the car on roads where it could be shamed by a golf cart.

Burnham

3,668 posts

259 months

Thursday 1st July 2010
quotequote all
Very nice, but look at the state of that wheel...hope it was not done on the test drive!

Daniel1

2,931 posts

198 months

Thursday 1st July 2010
quotequote all
Bill said:
soad said:
I love it - would be my perfect choice as a GT cruiser.
I'm not sure about perfect, but the convertible is vastly better looking than the coupe.
Makes your eyes bleed with the roof up though hurl

bermy boy

43 posts

179 months

Thursday 1st July 2010
quotequote all
I'd slightly challenge that Bentleys are boring. A few years back in a moment of unprecendented weakness I bought a cheap knackered K reg Turbo R and had a ton of fun sliding it round greasy roundabouts to the amusement/disgust of fellow motorists. Also took it to Le Mans once dressed as arabs which was a hoot. However the fun wore off quickly as the bills came in. Every little repair started at 500 quid and tyres were 320 a corner. Sold it for a four figure sum but happy memories. By the way, here in Bermuda the national maximum speed limit is 35kph so you were blessed with 25mph.