Driving no insurance

[saaby93]

It's very cleverly worded

RTA said:

(b)a person must not cause or permit any other person to use a motor vehicle on a road [or other public place] unless there is in force in relation to the use of the vehicle by that other person such a policy of insurance or such a security in respect of third party risks as complies with the requirements of this Part of this Act.

I had a brief thought that the 'a person' might be on the end of the telephone helpline in causing the person to drive while uninsured but it doesn't quite read that way

[R1 Loon]

saaby93 said:

It's very cleverly worded

RTA said:

(b)a person must not cause or permit any other person to use a motor vehicle on a road [or other public place] unless there is in force in relation to the use of the vehicle by that other person such a policy of insurance or such a security in respect of third party risks as complies with the requirements of this Part of this Act.

I had a brief thought that the 'a person' might be on the end of the telephone helpline in causing the person to drive while uninsured but it doesn't quite read that way

Do you ever give it a rest with your drivel?

Read the rest of the words in that and you'll see it's nothing to do with your "thought".

[Kinky]

Right folks, lets keep it simple. Please stop NOW with the petty and childish arguments, and threats.

Any more, and we'll go straight to ban, do not pass go.

And as a reminder, the PH posting rules here: http://www.pistonheads.com/gassing/rules.htm

One and only reminder. Please do take note.

[Noger]

saaby93 said:

It's very cleverly worded

RTA said:

(b)a person must not cause or permit any other person to use a motor vehicle on a road [or other public place] unless there is in force in relation to the use of the vehicle by that other person such a policy of insurance or such a security in respect of third party risks as complies with the requirements of this Part of this Act.

I had a brief thought that the 'a person' might be on the end of the telephone helpline in causing the person to drive while uninsured but it doesn't quite read that way

Neither causing not permitting.

Can't be cause, because that is a physical "here are the keys, now go to the supplier, employee" thing.

Can't be permit, because they are not in a position to give permission to drive someone else's car.

[R1 Loon]

Kinky said:

Right folks, lets keep it simple. Please stop NOW with the petty and childish arguments, and threats.

Any more, and we'll go straight to ban, do not pass go.

And as a reminder, the PH posting rules here: http://www.pistonheads.com/gassing/rules.htm

One and only reminder. Please do take note.

Noted from my end. Apologies for the frustration being shown in my posts, but the info being given on some posts is erroneous and could cause people to get into trouble that they don't need to.

[Kinky]

No worries

And thanks

[SPaGPOL]

Kinky said:

All right folks, let's keep it simple; Please stop NOW with the petty,childish arguments and threats.

Any more, and we'll go straight to a ban. Do not pass go.

As a reminder, the PH posting rules are here: http://www.pistonheads.com/gassing/rules.htm

The one and only reminder,please do take note.

EFA

It starts from the top.

SPaGPOL

[saaby93]

Why is TVR1 SPAgPOL?

[TVR1]

saaby93 said:

Why is TVR1 SPAgPOL?

It is humour. You know, the quality you seem to lack? But I would imagine humour and intellect go together, so two strikes for you, hey saaby?




Although, I really do respect and admire Kinky and it was a late night and I had been drugged.Yes, DRUGGED, I tell you! On red wine.

Edited by TVR1 on Sunday 19th December 11:27