RE: 2024 Porsche Macan 4 | PH Review

RE: 2024 Porsche Macan 4 | PH Review

Saturday 27th April

2024 Porsche Macan 4 | PH Review

Less powerful version of Porsche's new electric SUV feels like it will be the sweet spot


Porsche’s decision to let journalists drive both versions of the Macan EV back-to-back, on a route involving some of the finest roads in the south of France, was almost certainly in anticipation that we would prefer the faster, edgier and more expensive Turbo version. That’s how performance car hierarchies usually work, after all - more being better. Yet I came away from a day spent in the hills above Nice with a marked preference for the less powerful Macan 4. Not because there is anything wrong with the way the Turbo drives, but because the junior version just seems a more harmonious combination. 

Engineering a new electric car like the Macan definitely is not easy, and doing so costs hundreds of millions. But once you have built a new EV it is much simpler to produce a performance derivative than it is with a combustion car. For a high-output petrol or diesel you will need an engine with more cylinders, more displacement, more turbo boost - or possibly all three. That will also require more cooling, a beefier transmission to handle the upgrade, revised suspension and brakes to account for the change in mass - plus many other tweaks and tucks. 

Doing the same for an EV is - in relative terms - a doddle. A point made when I walked around a cutaway version of the new Macan’s powertrain at the launch with some of the engineers that had created it. Hardware differences are slight, to put it mildly. The Turbo - which produces 50 per cent more power than the Macan 4 - gets a different rear motor and inverter, bigger front brakes and also standard fitment of a torque vectoring rear differential. Pretty much everything else is common with the lesser car - the same front motor, same 95kWh battery, same cooling system. Pay the extra £2,064 to put air suspension and PASM adaptive dampers on the Macan 4 and you get the same system the Turbo gets as standard, the only changes being software tweaks to account for the fact the 4 is 75kg lighter. 

In short, the amount that is shared means that the Macan 4’s £69,800 base price looks like strong value when compared to the Turbo’s £95,000. The comparison isn’t quite that simple, as the Turbo brings a fair amount of extra standard kit as well as performance - and getting the Macan 4 to the same level requires additional outlay. It is also easy to blow straight past that point, with a full options workout taking it north of the Turbo’s base price. According to the build sheet of the Macan 4 I drove in France, it had almost managed the same feat - spec’d to £94,522 had it been delivered in the UK. Not bad for a car that was still riding on standard wheels, with the extras including extended leather (£2,805), carbon side blades (£917), an augmented reality head-up display (£1,694) and the BOSE speaker upgrade (£917). 

But you definitely don’t need to turn the Macan 4 into a show pony to enjoy it. Beneath the options there was a fundamental rightness to the balance between performance and handling of the sort that defines a really good car, and which Porsche has always done exceptionally well. There’s no doubt that many buyers will be swayed by the Turbo’s branding and power figures - it is the quickest SUV that Porsche has produced to date, by some margin. But that doesn’t make it a better car, and the Macan 4 feels much more accessible when unleashed on the real world. 

Of course, it’s not long since any compact SUV with 387hp (and a 408hp ‘overboost’) would have been at the sharpest end of the segment anyway. And although the Macan 4’s power-to-weight ratio is blunted by the 2,330kg it puts onto the scales, it still delivers serious punch. On Porsche’s numbers, it can get from 0-60mph in 4.9 seconds, making it 0.6 seconds slower than the V6-powered Macan GTS that sits on top of the range of petrol-powered versions. I’ve no reason to doubt that - but I’d also bet that, in any real-world comparison, the EV will have the legs on its V6 half-sister. Throttle response is instant and strong, its speed delivered without the need for a gearbox to kick down or for boost pressure to build. As tends to be the way in EVs, performance is both immediate and apparently effortless.

Of course, compared to the Macan Turbo, the 4 doesn’t feel crazy fast. Getting the Turbo’s throttle to its stop is something that won’t happen often on everyday roads; but the 4’s limits are much more accessible - although it can’t produce the same organ-shunting G-loadings as its quicker sister. Acceleration in the Macan 4 also starts to tail off beyond 80 mph - while the Turbo is still pulling strongly. Which hardly feels like a real-world imposition.

Like the Turbo, the Macan 4 on optional air suspension feels soft in the gentlest Normal mode, and even in Sport or Sport Plus there is still noticeable movement to the chassis as it responds to acceleration, braking and cornering - much more so than in the Taycan. Even as this happens, the adaptive dampers keep the Macan’s considerable mass under tight control - although despite riding on the smaller 20-inch wheels there was still a lumpiness to the way it dealt with France’s XL speedbumps. But on twisty roads and when cruising at speed it felt impressively stable and composed. The unanswered question, having experienced two cars with air suspension, is how well the Macan 4’s standard steel springs would cope with the same challenges. Here’s hoping at least one press car gets built with the basic suspension. 

There was no denying that the Macan’s chassis felt more composed with less power and fewer active dynamic systems. In part that is obviously because there is more time between things happening - the manic performance of the Turbo means straights are devoured more quickly, braking events tend to be bigger and it is easier to push closer to the edge of adhesion in even faster bends. 

But the Macan 4’s lack of the torque-vectoring rear differential and active rear steering meant it felt much more natural in tighter corners. Responses are less aggressive, yet more linear - and on some of the trickier bits of the Route Napoleon I tackled in both the 4 felt like it was flowing with the road, while the Turbo was trying to fight it into submission. The Macan 4 isn’t nearly as fast, but that’s always been a poor metric for driving enjoyment. I definitely got out of the less powerful car feeling as if I’d had more fun. 

Reviews of new EVs inevitably get pulled into the wider argument about the merits and costs of electrification. The Macan Turbo review is already into its eighth page of comments, and this one will probably trigger an equally heated debate. Which is why we’re here, after all. But regardless of the love or hate it engenders, behind the arguments the Macan 4S is an excellent car. 


Specification | Porsche Macan 4

Engine: Electric motors (twin, front and rear)
Gearbox: Single-speed gearbox (both axles), all-wheel drive
Power: 408hp (total system peak)
Torque: 479lb ft (total system peak)
0-60mph: 4.9secs
Top speed: 136mph (limited)
Kerb weight: 2,330 kg
Range: 380 miles (WLTP)
CO2: 0g/km
Price: £69,800 (as tested, £94,522)

Author
Discussion

Honeywell

Original Poster:

1,381 posts

99 months

Saturday 27th April
quotequote all
Utterly charmless with a huge price when you add options. Retailed by somewhat arrogant dealers. They'll sell loads but I'd rather walk.

rodericb

6,774 posts

127 months

Saturday 27th April
quotequote all
One of the superlatives for german cars used to be "bank vault" feelings of build quality. Now that the cashless society is fast approaching it's like they're sticking old bank vault into these cars to get those whopping weights. And the Porkers are usually on the lighter side of things...

911Spanker

1,243 posts

17 months

Saturday 27th April
quotequote all
Honeywell said:
Utterly charmless with a huge price when you add options. Retailed by somewhat arrogant dealers. They'll sell loads but I'd rather walk.
How would you carry luggage and go 200 miles?

wisbech

2,981 posts

122 months

Saturday 27th April
quotequote all
One to watch for in 5 years time on the second market. But without air suspension

GreatScott2016

1,202 posts

89 months

Saturday 27th April
quotequote all
It's not for me, but it's one of the better looking SUVs I think. Amazing how an options list can raise your eyebrows though yikes

Spiros115

349 posts

51 months

Saturday 27th April
quotequote all
Would be a real tempting option for a next company car but what does the poverty spec look like? Base taycans look absolutely terrible on awful wheels and you just can’t justify spending huge cash on options when you’re giving the thing back in 3/4 years.

Nicolas Lazar

139 posts

28 months

Saturday 27th April
quotequote all
That is the epitome of a pointless concept. Only fit for major urban conglomerates, which require neither high speed, nor offroad-ish capabilities. Try driving from somewhere in Western Europe down to the Balkans! LOL. For those old enough, think back on the first year of catalytic converters requiring unleaded fuel - huge parts of Europe were just off limits. Same now with charging infrastructure. There are still areas in Greater Europe where even today the rarety of gas stations require some fuel monitoring. And then the high-speed part. Even not talking about legal speed limits, an Autobahn high speed run with a BEV drains the battery inside 30 minutes. Just not do-able. I like the interior, and the rear. The front is very forced and unharmonic. In any case, it would be more honest to just offer it with front wheel drive.

kambites

67,599 posts

222 months

Saturday 27th April
quotequote all
£25k's worth of options on a car with a base price of £70k!

cerb4.5lee

30,756 posts

181 months

Saturday 27th April
quotequote all
kambites said:
£25k's worth of options on a car with a base price of £70k!
Porsche definitely have a cracking business model for sure. Although Porsches rock solid residual reputation is taking a bit of a battering since the introduction of EVs though I think. However that will probably only put stuff like 911 GT3s even further up in value though I'd imagine.

ICE Porsches will become even more desirable as EVs become more commonplace I reckon.

Kipsrs

438 posts

50 months

Saturday 27th April
quotequote all
This @ £95k or a standard Cayenne S @ £85k? Think I know where my money would go.

T1berious

2,269 posts

156 months

Saturday 27th April
quotequote all
GreatScott2016 said:
It's not for me, but it's one of the better looking SUVs I think. Amazing how an options list can raise your eyebrows though yikes
If you're going in with your own money, you'd keep an Eagle eye on the options costs.

Paint, leather, Bose and air suspension is probably all you'd really "need" and not harm resale. Porsche press cars often go well over 20k on options.

cayman-black

12,662 posts

217 months

Saturday 27th April
quotequote all
I prefer the old Macan and certainly would not spend that amount on one.

Silvanus

5,279 posts

24 months

Saturday 27th April
quotequote all
Take the badges off and it looks like a Chinese EV start up.

Cryssys

472 posts

39 months

Saturday 27th April
quotequote all
Kipsrs said:
This @ £95k or a standard Cayenne S @ £85k? Think I know where my money would go.
But would you want a poverty spec Cayenne S?

£25K in options is serious money and bordering on ridiculous, you could buy a decent second car for that sort of money.

Edited by Cryssys on Saturday 27th April 10:42

HighwayStar

4,296 posts

145 months

Saturday 27th April
quotequote all
Silvanus said:
Take the badges off and it looks like a Chinese EV start up.
To you maybe but IMV it retains enough styles cues for me to recognise it as a Porsche.

D4rez

1,401 posts

57 months

Saturday 27th April
quotequote all
Nicolas Lazar said:
That is the epitome of a pointless concept. Only fit for major urban conglomerates, which require neither high speed, nor offroad-ish capabilities. Try driving from somewhere in Western Europe down to the Balkans! LOL. For those old enough, think back on the first year of catalytic converters requiring unleaded fuel - huge parts of Europe were just off limits. Same now with charging infrastructure. There are still areas in Greater Europe where even today the rarety of gas stations require some fuel monitoring. And then the high-speed part. Even not talking about legal speed limits, an Autobahn high speed run with a BEV drains the battery inside 30 minutes. Just not do-able. I like the interior, and the rear. The front is very forced and unharmonic. In any case, it would be more honest to just offer it with front wheel drive.
Sounds like a 99.999th percentile use case that Porsche probably excluded from their customer profile for this car.

GreatScott2016

1,202 posts

89 months

Saturday 27th April
quotequote all
T1berious said:
GreatScott2016 said:
It's not for me, but it's one of the better looking SUVs I think. Amazing how an options list can raise your eyebrows though yikes
If you're going in with your own money, you'd keep an Eagle eye on the options costs.

Paint, leather, Bose and air suspension is probably all you'd really "need" and not harm resale. Porsche press cars often go well over 20k on options.
Yep, I get that but I just think that for this model, that's a 35% uplift over base price, just sounds high to me. £20k+ options on say a new GT3 would be a more "palatable" % increase smile

ITP

2,017 posts

198 months

Saturday 27th April
quotequote all
They will sell loads and loads of these, lightly optioned, for as long as the BIK tax discount is available. When/if that ends they won’t.

Silvanus

5,279 posts

24 months

Saturday 27th April
quotequote all
HighwayStar said:
Silvanus said:
Take the badges off and it looks like a Chinese EV start up.
To you maybe but IMV it retains enough styles cues for me to recognise it as a Porsche.
To us car bores maybe, but I bet plenty don't. Just showed my wife and she thought it was a Kia.

911Spanker

1,243 posts

17 months

Saturday 27th April
quotequote all
Silvanus said:
HighwayStar said:
Silvanus said:
Take the badges off and it looks like a Chinese EV start up.
To you maybe but IMV it retains enough styles cues for me to recognise it as a Porsche.
To us car bores maybe, but I bet plenty don't. Just showed my wife and she thought it was a Kia.
My daughter thought it was a Lamborghini.