PH Heroes: Honda S2000

Is the Honda S2000 a PH Hero? That’s a question we pondered before running this feature. It certainly hasn’t quite got the cult following of some of our previous Heroes. And while you’ll find ranks of fans of Honda’s roadster, you’ll also find a fair few dissenters too.

SSM was the start of the S2000 story
SSM was the start of the S2000 story
The case for the defence starts not when the S2000 was first released in 1999, but in fact with the SSM roadster of 1995. It was first shown at the Tokyo Motor Show that year, and featured a 2.0-litre, four-cylinder powerplant combined with a new type of chassis architecture, which Honda called β€˜X-Bone’ and which was claimed to make an enormous difference to vehicle rigidity. What’s more, the SSM boasted 50:50 weight distribution.

Record numbers
Four years later, the SSM finally entered production, in somewhat altered form, as the S2000. It retained the same chassis architecture and weight distribution, and with the aid of VTEC technology, its F20C 2.0-litre four produced a remarkable 240hp, giving it the highest specific power output for any mass-produced naturally-aspirated engine. It was a record it held for 11 years, and it took the might of Ferrari’s 458 Italia to break it.

Torque: does the S2000 have enough?
Torque: does the S2000 have enough?
But it wasn’t just the power figure that made the headlines; it was also the way it was delivered. The rev limiter came in at 9,000rpm – 9,000 – and peak power was delivered just shy of that at 8,300rpm. The VTEC system that enabled the engine to reach such heady power levels didn’t even become active (or, ahem, kick in) until 6,100rpm.

Torque Down
Of course, the top-end character of the S2000 also led to the criticism that’s most often levelled in its direction: torque. Or, to be more precise, a lack of it: the F20C could only muster 153lb ft, and it didn’t even do that until 7,500rpm.

It was an issue that was oft-cited in contemporary road tests – but driving the S2000 today, it really doesn’t seem like such a big problem. No, it won’t give you the mid-range punch of a turbo or a gutsy big-capacity lump – but it is still responsive low down, allowing you enough flexibility and docility to potter at your leisure.

9,000rpm limiter still feels bonkers
9,000rpm limiter still feels bonkers
But leave it in second, flex the right foot to the floor, and there’s plenty enough torque to get you up to that 6,100rpm mark in sprightly fashion. Then comes the noticeable kick in the back as the VTEC comes into play, and the remaining 3,000rpm are dispatched in double-quick time, your ears clobbered remorselessly by the glorious scream of four pistons attempting to do the job of six. It’s utterly addictive, so you snatch at the wonderfully stumpy, slick gearlever and nail the throttle again, allowing the scenery to blur, revelling in the noise, not wanting to stop until you realise your license is quaking in its boots. Who needs low-end torque?

Snap, crackle & pop
It's the engine that's the car’s centrepiece, then. In more ways than one, in fact, as it’s mounted so far back as to in fact make the car front-mid-engined – which explains the long bonnet and somewhat cramped cockpit. It also explains that 50:50 weight distribution, which translates when you aim the nose at some corners. There’s some deadness to the steering, it has to be said; the PAS was electric, which should tell you all you need to know. But despite that it’s quick and direct, so you end up seeing past its shortcomings and enjoying the chassis.

Grin-inducing chassis rights EPAS's wrongs
Grin-inducing chassis rights EPAS's wrongs
Snappy, is it? Well, push it too hard, and yes, it will go from grip to slide pretty damn fast. But on a dry road, and in this facelifted model with its chassis revisions, there’s a predictability to it, too. It gives you fair warning before it lets go, and with familiarity comes the ability to provoke – and hold – tail-out behaviour without the oft-touted backwards exit through a hedge. The result? Endless, childish giggling, mostly. Of course, if you eschew such loonish behaviour, it feels planted and grippy, with a light, nimble front end that darts into corners eagerly. Β 

But is it a PH Hero? I reckon so. It’s that engine that seals it. PHers often comment that the joy of driving a petrol-engined car is found in the thrill of wringing its neck, squeezing out those last few revs and timing the change just perfectly to catch the next wave of power. Few cars satisfy that thrill in quite such spectacular fashion; few do so quite so accessibly, either, both in terms of second-hand values and running costs. The S2000 is a driver’s car unlike any other; it might not suit everyone, but what it achieves – and what it offers – is quite remarkable.

1,997cc 4-cyl
Transmission: 5-speed manual
Power (hp): 240@8,300rpm
Torque (lb ft): 162@6,500rpm
0-62mph: 6.2 sec
Top speed: 150mph
Weight: 1,285kg
On sale: 1999-2009
Price new (2004): Β£26,513
Price now: Β£3,000-Β£14,500

Photography: Prime Exposures

P.H. O'meter

Join the PH rating wars with your marks out of 10 for the article (Your ratings will be shown in your profile if you have one!)

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
Rate this article

Comments (263) Join the discussion on the forum

  • rallye666 22 Feb 2013

    Somebody has had their wheel re-trimmed! wink

    I love mine, although its 2002 model and has caught me out a few times with its snappy back end.

    It can be improved dramatically with a few mods though.

    A decent geo setup made a world of difference to mine, and improved the steering feel no end.

    Disconcerting passive RWS can be dialled out a rear "anti bump steer" kit.

    Makes it much more confidence inspiring!

    Edited by rallye666 on Friday 22 February 10:35

  • Prof Prolapse 22 Feb 2013

    Great cars. Such a bargain used buy.

  • 300bhp/ton 22 Feb 2013

    PistonHeads said:
    the F20C could only muster 153lb ft (162 in the stat panel),
    Would PH be able to show me another 2.0 n/a petrol engine that makes significantly more torque than this?

    Edited by 300bhp/ton on Friday 22 February 10:41

    Edited by 300bhp/ton on Friday 22 February 10:42

  • ghibbett 22 Feb 2013

    ALways liked the idea of one of these. I think they still look good today.

    However I remember a fair few years back, whilst darting around in the Fabia vRS I had at the time, one of these latching onto my rear bumper as we entered a known slippery left-hander with mid corner bump. Looking back in my rear view, I was shocked at how quickly the back end came round and it lodged itself in a hedge.

  • omgus 22 Feb 2013

    Bugger off PH, i'm off to view two of these this weekend and i don't want any more competition for them.



View all comments in the forums Make a comment