Range Rover Sport SVR vs Porsche Cayenne Turbo S

Leave your humility at the door please! Yes, when it comes to excess all areas SUVs we're going maximum attack, pitching 'our' Range Rover Sport SVR against the fastest, most extravagant Cayenne you can (currently) buy, the Β£118K Turbo S. Brace yourselves, we're begging indulgence for yet another attempt at the Ultimate England Vs Germany grouptest...

For a good portion of PHers this is a pointless manhood measurement contest between two pumped up, attention-seeking braggarts. More generously you might consider both of these cars guilty pleasures; extravagant family motors for the upwardly mobile in search of the ticks-all-boxes solution to please all members of the household. If you're going to do it you may as well do it properly and all that.

Top of the Range Rover Sport tree or not a quick glance of the spec sheets will reveal the twin-turbo Cayenne enters this contest boasting the more impressive numbers. There's that 570hp to the SVR's 550hp, a thumping 590lb ft against 501lb ft for the Range Rover's supercharged V8, a 100kg weight saving and a massive Β£23,305 premium over the Sport's Β£95,150. 0-62 and top speed also weigh in the Porsche's favour.

This is still an away match for the Cayenne though. Porsche has grown fat off the success of its genre defining sportlich SUV. But flip this contest on its head and imagine a comparison between 911 GT3 and an imaginary Range Rover sports car and you get a sense of the challenge the SVR lays down. Character goes a long way and all that.

Range Rover Sport SVR
You'll be familiar with this car from its appearances on the PH Fleet and the slow burn charm offensive. You may not like the genre but, hell, the SVR's charisma is sufficient to have you making exceptions.

The Sport has the instant advantage of not trying to be something it's not. Easier to tighten up the handling of an SUV and make it feel a bit sporty than attempt to contrive the feeling of driving a 911 Turbo in a top-heavy, four-seat 4x4 after all.

In styling and dynamics the Range Rover has nothing to hide. It's a burly 4x4, square-cut and drawing on a formidable heritage. Handsome is eye of the beholder but proportionally the Sport manages to be both faithful to its traditions without looking at all retro. It's unapologetic but undeniably fit for purpose. Same can be said for the interior, the only let-down being an infotainment interface seemingly a generation behind the rest of the car.

On the road it's as big a laugh as that outrageous exhaust note suggests. Chassis and powertrain wise both of these cars settle on variations of the same solution to combining huge power with seemingly unfavourable weight distribution. Both have variable height air suspension, active anti-roll systems and clever active diff based distribution of power. In the SVR's case it feels more like a souped-up off-roader, albeit carried off with some style.

Electrically assisted, and with a mechanical variable rack, the steering, nonetheless, remains key. The weighting is spot-on, giving you a sense of something to push against and just a hint of what's going on beneath. On all-seasons tyres the grip levels are such you can actually play with its balance on the throttle to an extent too, the long travel suspension meaning you can throw the weight around to where it can help, not hinder.

The linearity of the power delivery can fool you into thinking it's not quite as fast as you might hope. It is though, the view over the hedges from the raised seating position and fearsome punch making it quite the overtaking weapon when confronted with the dawdling masses.

Look for a used Range Rover Sport SVR in the classifieds!

Porsche Cayenne Turbo S
If you want a more car-like driving experience the Cayenne is by far the better choice. But then, if you wanted a more car-like driving experience, surely you'd actually be better off with a Panamera, or equivalent M, RS or AMG? So lies the mystery for the few still not sold on the whole performance crossover thing.

From the off the Cayenne seems desperate to convince you you're in anything but an SUV. The driving position is low-slung, the instrument binnacles enveloping, the shoulder-line high and the wheel much smaller than the Range Rover's yacht-like helm. Which makes the oddly light and insincere weighting of the Power Steering Plus - an option on most other Cayennes - all the more disconcerting. It's not an active variable ratio system like that used by Audi and others but its impact on your confidence is as telling.

This isn't helped by the appalling visibility. The Range Rover, shall we say, enhances your confidence by elevating you over the masses and letting you savour the view. The Cayenne is more like driving an armoured vehicle and peering through slit-like windows, increasing the sense of isolation and disconnection. And in a car this potent that's a little worrying.

No complaints about the way it goes though, the S offering a decent step up from the 520hp and 553lb ft of the regular Cayenne Turbo. It also gets kit like the roll-cancelling PDCC and PCCM ceramic brakes as standard too, somewhat offsetting that burly entry price and premium over the SVR.

The turbos mean an initial softness to the throttle response, swiftly replaced by a thrilling rush of boost. The Sports Exhaust does a good job of making it sound the part too, though it has to defer to the Range Rover's frankly outrageous racket on this regard. The any which way permutations of the various Sport, Sport Plus, suspension, gearshift and other modes are frankly a little bewildering compared with the Range Rover's simpler twist dial. Once you find your optimum setting it's flatter and more tied down than the Range Rover but also lacks its sense of flow.

Both make great use of their shared eight-speed automatic gearbox too, slurring about when needed but also able to deliver as crisp an impression of a paddle-shifted manual as you'd ever need in a car like this.

Look for a used Porsche Cayenne Turbo S in the classifieds!

By conventional measures neither of these cars is especially likeable. In their own ways they both astonish in their application of technology to overcome the inherent shortcomings in their size, weight and centre of gravity. For all their different characters they also settle on comparable solutions to the problem too.

Then the history of the SUV is written the Cayenne will arguably have as significant a part to play as the original Range Rover. A Porsche masquerading as an off-roader still feels like a bit of a novelty though. And for all its genre-defining success when it faces about the most dynamically accomplished Range Rovers yet built it suddenly looks out of its comfort zone.

The Porsche is the faster vehicle, capable of lapping the 'ring 15 seconds faster than the SVR if such things matter. It's the one that feels more like a car and less like a 4x4. Its interior wins out on quality and opulence, if not its slightly fussy style. But for all its ability it's less engaging, arguably still fighting the contradiction of sports car in an SUV body the Range Rover will never have to face and considerably more expensive too. And the fact the SVR runs the Cayenne so close dynamically without seemingly compromising the mud-plugging credentials gives it credibility to match the charisma.

: 4,997cc, V8 supercharged
Transmission: 8-speed automatic, four-wheel drive
Power (hp): 550@6,000rpm
Torque (lb ft): 501@2,500-5,500rpm
0-62mph: 4.5sec
Top speed: 162mph
Weight: 2,335kg ('from')
MPG: 22.1mpg (NEDC combined)
CO2: 298g/km
Price: Β£95,150 (Β£106,635 as tested comprising of Β£450 for Solar Attenuating Windscreen with Laminated Hydrophobic Front, Rear Door and Quarter Light Glass, Β£600 for 8 inch High Resolution Touch-screen with Dual-View (includes one set of WhiteFire headphones), Β£4,000 for Meridian Signature Reference Audio System (1700W) with radio and single slot CD player, MP3 disc, file compatability and conversation assist with 23 speakers and subwoofer, Contrast Painted Roof - Santorini Black, Sliding Panoramic Roof including Powered Blind, Β£185 for Adjustable, Auto-dimming, Heated, Powerfold Memory Exterior Mirrors with Approach Lamps (approach lamps include illuminated Range Rover graphic), Β£700 for Surround Camera System with Towing Assist, Β£750 for Wade SensingTM with Blind Spot Monitoring with Closing Vehicle Sensing and Reverse Traffic Detection, Β£600 for Traffic Sign Recognition and Lane Departure Warning, Β£1,000 for Head Up Display, Β£900 for Park Assist featuring Parallel Park, Parking Exit, Perpendicular Parking and 360Β° Park Distance Control, Β£1,500 for SVR Carbon Fibre Engine Cover and Β£800 for Digital TV)

: 4,806cc, twin turbo-charged V8
Transmission: 8-speed tiptronic S, four-wheel drive
Power (hp): 578@6,000rpm
Torque (lb ft): 590@2,250-4,000rpm
0-62mph: 4.1sec
Top speed: 176mph
Weight: 2,235kg (DIN Unladen)
MPG: 24.6mpg
CO2: 267g/km
Price: Β£118,455 (Β£123,227 as tested comprising of Β£1,934 for Sports exhaust system including tail pipe in black, Β£122 for monochrome black exterior package, Β£210 for comfort lighting, Β£320 for privacy glass, Β£825 for electrically-retractable tow ball, Β£446 for reversing camera and Β£591 for roof rails painted in black)













P.H. O'meter

Join the PH rating wars with your marks out of 10 for the article (Your ratings will be shown in your profile if you have one!)

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
Rate this article

Comments (136) Join the discussion on the forum

  • toppstuff 31 Mar 2016

    Dan - We get it that you don't like SUVs. Your narrative is always laced with such negativity, as you seem convinced that your readership does not like these things and that somehow it does not fit what you believe to be the Ph demographic.

    You are wrong.

    These are immensely useful cars. Anyone who does not live an urban or suburban existence will tell you that there is nothing better for the day to day life of living in rural areas. It it ironic that many urban dwellers see these cars as "chelsea chariots" but there is a significant part of your demographic that lives in the sticks and for whom these cars make a lot of sense - people like Harry Metcalfe, but probably not as rich... smile

  • Fittster 31 Mar 2016

    toppstuff said:
    Anyone who does not live an urban or suburban existence will tell you that there is nothing better for the day to day life of living in rural areas.
    I live in a rural area and I don't see the need for an SUV.

  • AH33 31 Mar 2016

    Never going to have one myself, I can think of lots of better ways to spend £110k, but I like the fact that cars like this still exist in todays increasingly militant lentilist world. If it pisses people off, good. Thats a large part of the appeal.

  • Hugh Jarse 31 Mar 2016

    Interesting that the 2wd faux off roader and these turbo nutter 4wd variants are the new car shape.
    Easy to get in and out of, good view of the road, comfortable seats.
    Its how cars began, before they came all swoopy and low.
    1920's Austin:

  • toppstuff 31 Mar 2016

    Fittster said:
    toppstuff said:
    Anyone who does not live an urban or suburban existence will tell you that there is nothing better for the day to day life of living in rural areas.
    I live in a rural area and I don't see the need for an SUV.
    Then you aren't rural enough. Got a horsebox?

View all comments in the forums Make a comment