Never received penalty notice
Never received penalty notice
Author
Discussion

John Henry

Original Poster:

158 posts

185 months

Sunday 17th August
quotequote all
Followed a Q7 into a box junction. I could see there was sufficient room for us both to clear the yellow grid. Q7 driver stopped approx 8ft short of the car in front of it. Despite my indicating as such, the driver refused to move forward, leaving my rear bumper and back tyres transgressing the last box junction yellow line for 20 secs. No obstruction caused to anyone else.
I know all of this as result of receiving a letter linking to video. I also recalled the incident. However, the letter states that I ignored the ‘initial letter’ which it claims was sent some two months earlier. That letter offered a discount on the penalty charge of £80.
The letter I’ve received demands £160 plus an £80 charge certificate.
I’ve contacted the local authority concerned and explained that I,
genuinely didn’t receive any communication prior. They confirm they never posted via a tracked or signed for service.
Following correspondence they state- ‘in the interest of reasonableness’ they will suspend the charge certificate if I pay the full ticket amount of £160.
This seems entirely unfair as I didn’t receive any previous correspondence.
Is it worth my contesting this point via hearing or is the system such that I will be doomed whatever?

Nick Forest

304 posts

100 months

Sunday 17th August
quotequote all
Pay it, and move on with your life.

Motorists are here to be milked until we’re bled dry…that’s the way these days unfortunately.

I’d say you’d had a reasonable outcome all things considered.

Glassman

23,770 posts

232 months

Sunday 17th August
quotequote all
They will have proof of sending.

croyde

24,943 posts

247 months

Sunday 17th August
quotequote all
Post is so st these days. I often receive stuff 2 weeks after they were sent.

Busa mav

2,761 posts

171 months

Monday 18th August
quotequote all
Lambeth Council by any chance ?

LosingGrip

8,379 posts

176 months

Monday 18th August
quotequote all
Post on ftla.uk and following their instructions for how to put your post (redacted copy of letters etc). They'll help you.

Very knowledgeable members.

John Henry

Original Poster:

158 posts

185 months

Wednesday 27th August
quotequote all
Followed a Q7 into a box junction. I could see there was sufficient room for us both to clear the yellow grid. Q7 driver stopped approx 8ft short of the car in front of it. Despite my indicating as such, the driver refused to move forward, leaving my rear bumper and back tyres transgressing the last box junction yellow line for 20 secs. No obstruction caused to anyone else.
I know all of this as result of receiving a letter linking to video. I also recalled the incident. However, the letter states that I ignored the ‘initial letter’ which it claims was sent some two months earlier. That letter offered a discount on the penalty charge of £80.
The letter I’ve received demands £160 plus an £80 charge certificate.
I’ve contacted the local authority concerned and explained that I,
genuinely didn’t receive any communication prior. They confirm they never posted via a tracked or signed for service.
Following correspondence they state- ‘in the interest of reasonableness’ they will suspend the charge certificate if I pay the full ticket amount of £160.
This seems entirely unfair as I didn’t receive any previous correspondence.
Is it worth my contesting this point via hearing or is the system such that I will be doomed whatever?

Rivenink

4,016 posts

123 months

Wednesday 27th August
quotequote all
John Henry said:
Followed a Q7 into a box junction. I could see there was sufficient room for us both to clear the yellow grid. Q7 driver stopped approx 8ft short of the car in front of it. Despite my indicating as such, the driver refused to move forward, leaving my rear bumper and back tyres transgressing the last box junction yellow line for 20 secs. No obstruction caused to anyone else.
I know all of this as result of receiving a letter linking to video. I also recalled the incident. However, the letter states that I ignored the ‘initial letter’ which it claims was sent some two months earlier. That letter offered a discount on the penalty charge of £80.
The letter I’ve received demands £160 plus an £80 charge certificate.
I’ve contacted the local authority concerned and explained that I,
genuinely didn’t receive any communication prior. They confirm they never posted via a tracked or signed for service.
Following correspondence they state- ‘in the interest of reasonableness’ they will suspend the charge certificate if I pay the full ticket amount of £160.
This seems entirely unfair as I didn’t receive any previous correspondence.
Is it worth my contesting this point via hearing or is the system such that I will be doomed whatever?
You stopped in a yellow box junction. You were caught doing so on video.

I'm guessing this was in London and was on a Red Route. The fine is £160, reduced to £80 if paid early (within 14 days). If you fail to pay the £160, an additional penalty charge can be applied of £80.

You've explained you didn't get the letters, and so they're giving you the benefit of the doubt by removing the £80 additional penalty charge.

Pay the £160, be more cautious about yellow boxes, and move on with life.

Cliftonite

8,604 posts

155 months

Wednesday 27th August
quotequote all
.
When you entered the box you had judged there was space available to clear it.

This guy will be able to help you:

https://www.yellowboxes.co.uk/


GasEngineer

1,573 posts

79 months

Thursday
quotequote all
Somebody else had exactly the same problem a couple of weeks ago..

https://www.pistonheads.com/gassing/topic.asp?h=0&...

TwigtheWonderkid

46,712 posts

167 months

Thursday
quotequote all
Cliftonite said:
.
When you entered the box you had judged there was space available to clear it.

This guy will be able to help you:

https://www.yellowboxes.co.uk/
He's not arguing his innocence. He knows he was in the wrong. He's arguing about the £160 fine when he wasn't given the chance to pay the original £80 fine.