Using ECU data to prove I was stationary at time of accident
Using ECU data to prove I was stationary at time of accident
Author
Discussion

heisthegaffer

Original Poster:

3,891 posts

215 months

Monday 25th August
quotequote all
Hi all

Unfortunately a silly lying idiot reversed into me a couple of weeks ago when I had been stationary for around 5 mins.

We were at a car park where they were waiting for someone in front of her to park and I gave her at least a car length to back up a bit. They clearly didn't look in her rear view mirror amd reversed quite quickly into my car, to the point I barely had time to sound my horn when she hit me.

My question is, can the ECU be interrogated to support/prove the fact my car hadn't moved for between 5 and 10 mins until I drove off after wed swapped names and taken pictures of the cars?

They have admitted in a text that they looked behind and saw there was enough room. I want to be able to prove that my vehicle didn't move for some time.

If this can be done, who would I approach to get this data? Does anyone know home long the ECU would store such data please?

I'm furious with this person. She's lying and is mis representing what happened thus going against her policy conditions and I have asked her Ins co to point this out. She is part of the reason all our premiums go up every year.

alscar

6,727 posts

230 months

Monday 25th August
quotequote all
My guess is that the ECU doesn’t actually store “ driving “ data and therefore cannot be interrogated ?
If you had a car theft tracker fitted that would show movement but not necessarily stationary history ?
Does the car park have any cctv coverage as that might be a better solution ?

EmailAddress

14,522 posts

235 months

Monday 25th August
quotequote all
There's a chance it logged it as an 'incident'.

But you've left it very late.

paul_c123

1,095 posts

10 months

Monday 25th August
quotequote all
Certain more modern cars can indeed log data to this level of detail, and it can & has been used as evidence in serious police investigations (eg car accidents involving deaths, etc). I believe they use specialist forensic firms to interrogate and download the data in the ECU to an evidential level. But it obviously depends on age/make/model of car, which you've not stated in the OP (not really an issue, I'd be none the wiser anyway).

If you really wanted to pursue this route, you'd need to seek out one of the few companies who can do this kind of work, and be prepared to pay for it - I imagine £2000-10000.

ADJimbo

684 posts

203 months

Monday 25th August
quotequote all
There is an outfit in Liverpool called Hoopers who are vehicle assessors but can access and mine ECU’s as part of their accident investigations.

I’ve never dealt with them so cannot vouch or recommend them but they would be my starter for ten. Whether or not it would be cost-effective for such a low speed, damage only impact or whether they’d want to do the work I do not know.

119

13,103 posts

53 months

Monday 25th August
quotequote all
Don't the ECUs continually monitor engine data?

davek_964

10,321 posts

192 months

Monday 25th August
quotequote all
119 said:
Don't the ECUs continually monitor engine data?
Even if they do, they can't store that forever.

Extracting data to prove you were stationary at a certain date and time for a car park collision seems unlikely

119

13,103 posts

53 months

Monday 25th August
quotequote all
davek_964 said:
119 said:
Don't the ECUs continually monitor engine data?
Even if they do, they can't store that forever.

Extracting data to prove you were stationary at a certain date and time for a car park collision seems unlikely
smile

blank

3,680 posts

205 months

Monday 25th August
quotequote all
What car is it and did it "know" it had been hit?

I guess airbags didn't go off but some cars do have some forms of crash detection.

If it's reasonably modern and detected something there's a chance it triggered an Accident Data Recorder.

Or if it's connected to an app it may have something.

Otherwise not much hope as ECUs don't generally record live data without a reason.

thisnameistaken

242 posts

45 months

Monday 25th August
quotequote all
This is something I do quite regularly for investigations. You’d need software to interrogate the ECUs such as Berla. I’d recommend Harper Shaw https://harpershaw.co.uk/the-vehicle-network-app-1
who’d be able to advise on your options. It’s far from cheap though.

Different vehicles store a wide variety of data though. Some manufacturers store huge amounts whilst others very little. There may also be an option, if your vehicle manufacturer supports it, to acquire telematics data from the manufacturer or their data acquisition partner agency if the vehicles new enough to have an embedded SIM. I’ll warn, this is highly unlikely as it’ll fall outside of GDPR data subject rights and the manufacturers are understandably reluctant to reveal what data they acquire so it’s often difficult from a law enforcement perspective let alone a private one.

What’s the vehicle? I may be able to advise what you’re likely to get.

Simpo Two

89,432 posts

282 months

Monday 25th August
quotequote all
thisnameistaken said:
There may also be an option, if your vehicle manufacturer supports it, to acquire telematics data from the manufacturer or their data acquisition partner agency if the vehicles new enough to have an embedded SIM. I’ll warn, this is highly unlikely as it’ll fall outside of GDPR data subject rights and the manufacturers are understandably reluctant to reveal what data they acquire so it’s often difficult from a law enforcement perspective let alone a private one.
If the owner of the car wants data to prove where his car was that should (in a sane world) be simple enough. It would be if they asked for data on somebody else's car I would expect a no.

Why are manufacturers 'understandably reluctant' to reveal what data they acquire? Would I not have a right to know what data MY car is collecting? What about a SAR?

thisnameistaken

242 posts

45 months

Monday 25th August
quotequote all
Simpo Two said:
If the owner of the car wants data to prove where his car was that should (in a sane world) be simple enough. It would be if they asked for data on somebody else's car I would expect a no.

Why are manufacturers 'understandably reluctant' to reveal what data they acquire? Would I not have a right to know what data MY car is collecting? What about a SAR?
They’re reluctant to reveal their data as LEAs use that data for investigations. It becomes very difficult to sell a car when it becomes widely known that car grassed on you via the embedded SIM. It’s very similar to different telecoms networks providing different types of data to LEAs. As soon as it’s common knowledge that network A tells the cops a very specific thing that network B doesn’t. network A’s reputation is tarnished and nobody buys network A. As a result the tactics and technical opportunities are sensitive and the process becomes a protected tactic to protect the manufacturer and LEAs.

Further to that, many manufacturers operate and store their data outside of the UK using third party data controllers who are also outside of the investigatory powers act and GDPR purposely to make it harder for public and LEAs to acquire the data without a Mutual Legal Assistance Treaty.

paul_c123

1,095 posts

10 months

Monday 25th August
quotequote all
...Probably to avoid lawsuits similar to the "GM Driver data lawsuit"

https://www.ftc.gov/news-events/news/press-release...

Simpo Two

89,432 posts

282 months

Monday 25th August
quotequote all
thisnameistaken said:
They’re reluctant to reveal their data as LEAs use that data for investigations. It becomes very difficult to sell a car when it becomes widely known that car grassed on you via the embedded SIM.
If it's so embarrassing for them perhaps they should stop collecting it. But then, if they said 'No we're not collecting that information, really we're not' - would you believe them? The whole thing is frankly disturbing.

paul_c123 said:
...Probably to avoid lawsuits similar to the "GM Driver data lawsuit"

https://www.ftc.gov/news-events/news/press-release...
Seems fair. What I was proposing was the data going to the car's owner (on request if they wanted it), not the authorities.

Jakg

3,821 posts

185 months

Monday 25th August
quotequote all
Simpo Two said:
Why are manufacturers 'understandably reluctant' to reveal what data they acquire? Would I not have a right to know what data MY car is collecting? What about a SAR?
You can try it, but when they say "we don't have that information", what are you going to say/do?

MustangGT

13,448 posts

297 months

Monday 25th August
quotequote all
Simpo Two said:
If the owner of the car wants data to prove where his car was that should (in a sane world) be simple enough. It would be if they asked for data on somebody else's car I would expect a no.

Why are manufacturers 'understandably reluctant' to reveal what data they acquire? Would I not have a right to know what data MY car is collecting? What about a SAR?
Car data is car data, not personal data per se.

Panamax

6,686 posts

51 months

Monday 25th August
quotequote all
I think people are getting muddled between the engine ECU, which may record things like the number of misfires or over-revs, and the airbag Event Data Recorder (ADR).

The EDR generally holds only a few seconds of data which are continuously being over-written unless and until an airbag deployment stops the system. It's there to ascertain "why the airbag deployed" rather than anything else and can include things like throttle, brake and steering positions. I think it's fair to say that if your airbags didn't deploy there'll be nothing to find after the event.






leyorkie

1,757 posts

193 months

Tuesday 26th August
quotequote all
This site should tell you what information is available.

https://vehicleprivacyreport.com/

untakenname

5,150 posts

209 months

Tuesday 26th August
quotequote all
Dependent on the car but generally unless it's sensed a crash then it likely won't keep logs that long.

I'd be looking around the carpark for any CCTV and then doing a SAR for that.

dundarach

5,727 posts

245 months

Tuesday 26th August
quotequote all
Have you explained to your insurance company that you'll be asking them, to ask on your behalf to review all CCTV data in the area and interrogate your car and google\apple tracking data on your phone.

I'd be making sure my insurance company knew that I'd be asking them to do a load of work to prove my innocence!