Did I get caught ? (Pic) 56/50 indicated
Did I get caught ? (Pic) 56/50 indicated
Author
Discussion

joropug

Original Poster:

3,075 posts

220 months

Saturday 28th September 2019
quotequote all
56 on the dash, Waze claims 56 is 54 GPS speed,

First lined up with it in pic 1, slammed my brakes on in pic 2.





The red car braked a lot later than me. Presume they target outside lane though....


kiethton

14,668 posts

211 months

Saturday 28th September 2019
quotequote all
Have you had anything thing through?

If not I reckon you’ll be ok

BertBert

21,326 posts

242 months

Saturday 28th September 2019
quotequote all
Just what we love - brake slammers.

joropug

Original Poster:

3,075 posts

220 months

Saturday 28th September 2019
quotequote all
Happened this morning. Nothing behind me so ok to brake.

Hoping I'm just on the right side of the limit so long as their camera is accurate

Osinjak

5,453 posts

152 months

Saturday 28th September 2019
quotequote all
I can't even see what you're braking for?

joropug

Original Poster:

3,075 posts

220 months

Saturday 28th September 2019
quotequote all

barney123

495 posts

242 months

Saturday 28th September 2019
quotequote all
Probably ok - my mrs got done at 58 , which I guess is lowest speed after the 10%+2 guideline.

Stoofa

959 posts

199 months

Saturday 28th September 2019
quotequote all
barney123 said:
Probably ok - my mrs got done at 58 , which I guess is lowest speed after the 10%+2 guideline.
Well no, 10%+2 is 57....

anonymous-user

85 months

Saturday 28th September 2019
quotequote all
barney123 said:
Probably ok - my mrs got done at 58 , which I guess is lowest speed after the 10%+2 guideline.
10% + 2 is the lowest speed at which you can be prosecuted. 10% + 1 is the so-called safe speed.

joropug

Original Poster:

3,075 posts

220 months

Saturday 28th September 2019
quotequote all
I presume in these calculations that the GPS speed is most consistent with their guns

poo at Paul's

14,621 posts

206 months

Saturday 28th September 2019
quotequote all
I'd not be too worried about that, but your observation about targetting the outside lane may be true, so perhaps use the nearside one when you can?

CAPP0

20,881 posts

234 months

Saturday 28th September 2019
quotequote all
poo at Paul's said:
I'd not be too worried about that, but your observation about targetting the outside lane may be true, so perhaps use the nearside one when you can?
hehe

anonymous-user

85 months

Saturday 28th September 2019
quotequote all
When I used to work in the courts, I was speaking to a van operator once and he said he gave three seconds for a driver to adjust their speed as long as they weren't taking the micky. It was to help with drivers not slamming on their brakes but tbf i think any driver does it as soon as they see a speed camera van.

joropug

Original Poster:

3,075 posts

220 months

Saturday 28th September 2019
quotequote all
poo at Paul's said:
I'd not be too worried about that, but your observation about targetting the outside lane may be true, so perhaps use the nearside one when you can?
Haha . There's a car to my left also

anonymous-user

85 months

Saturday 28th September 2019
quotequote all
Did Waze not give an alert for it?

joropug

Original Poster:

3,075 posts

220 months

Saturday 28th September 2019
quotequote all
MDMA . said:
Did Waze not give an alert for it?
Annoyingly I favoured the Mercedes sat nav for this journey frown there was another camera later on too funnily enough,


Ian Geary

5,642 posts

223 months

Saturday 28th September 2019
quotequote all
BertBert said:
Just what we love - brake slammers.
When relatively minor speed transgressions are policed quite harshly (relative to, say tailgating or not returning to the left lane which get virtually no enforcement), the safety partnership system does tend to result in that behaviour unfortunately.

I wasn't aware of an informal 3 second rule (so don't see how that would help avoid brake slamming behaviour) but does seem sensible and probably explains why i've never had a ticket from a van.

It was quite good observation on the OP's part..I couldn't make anything out on the first pic, though I suppose a wide angle dashcam is not designed for long range focus.

Ian

joropug

Original Poster:

3,075 posts

220 months

Saturday 28th September 2019
quotequote all
Yeah I think the camera hides it, by the time I braked I was definitely in range.

It's an involuntary reaction to brake. See camera, look at Speedo, brake.

More annoying is they're prolific on this road and I'm usually super careful. Early morning drive false sense of security.

I just hope I was still gently accelerating (this is just after a roundabout) and not decelerating as it could mean my speed was higher than my dash read out.

Edited by joropug on Saturday 28th September 14:29

Pica-Pica

16,700 posts

115 months

Saturday 28th September 2019
quotequote all
BertBert said:
Just what we love - brake slammers.
Indeed. Pointless for camera vans.

jmsgld

1,085 posts

207 months

Saturday 28th September 2019
quotequote all
I think you would be very unlucky to get an NIP in the scenario described.

I too use Waze,but have had 3 x 2 week waits in the last year. On each occasion I noticed the van at the first possible opportunity and was back within the speed limit quickly. I still have a clean license...