Is this legal?
Author
Discussion

un1corn

Original Poster:

2,143 posts

168 months

Monday 21st October 2019
quotequote all
I know it's obstructing the view out of the junction, and it's on the pavement.

What about the fact it's propped up on a combination of trolley jack, bricks and axle stands? Doesnt look very safe.


Shaw Tarse

31,903 posts

234 months

Monday 21st October 2019
quotequote all
Well it's not on the road!

roadsmash

2,667 posts

101 months

Monday 21st October 2019
quotequote all
Can’t wait to see 50 pages of arguing about this. smile

rowley birkin

513 posts

131 months

Monday 21st October 2019
quotequote all
That's verging on dangerous.

barian

178 posts

132 months

Monday 21st October 2019
quotequote all
Perfectly legal, and exploits a little known loophole in the law. In order for a vehicle to be deemed to be parked in a particular location, one or more of its wheels must be in contact with the surface. I always jack my car up in a similar manner when parking on double yellow lines, disabled bays etc. Never fails.

BertBert

21,320 posts

242 months

Monday 21st October 2019
quotequote all
barian said:
Perfectly legal, and exploits a little known loophole in the law. In order for a vehicle to be deemed to be parked in a particular location, one or more of its wheels must be in contact with the surface. I always jack my car up in a similar manner when parking on double yellow lines, disabled bays etc. Never fails.
I've had air-jacks installed to make it much easier. I pretty much park where I like biggrin

pidsy

8,714 posts

188 months

Monday 21st October 2019
quotequote all
rowley birkin said:
That's verging on dangerous.
I got it!

meatballs

1,140 posts

91 months

Monday 21st October 2019
quotequote all
pidsy said:
I got it!
Oh my that was sneaksy.

nonsequitur

20,083 posts

147 months

Monday 21st October 2019
quotequote all
roadsmash said:
Can’t wait to see 50 pages of arguing about this. smile
I'll put monet on 8/10 pages. When someone goes off piste with a post about pottery. Then it fades slowly away.

Chozza

808 posts

183 months

Monday 21st October 2019
quotequote all
nonsequitur said:
I'll put monet on 8/10 pages. When someone goes off piste with a post about pottery. Then it fades slowly away.
Monet by page 8 ..... ok


Escort3500

13,570 posts

176 months

Monday 21st October 2019
quotequote all
Chozza said:
nonsequitur said:
I'll put monet on 8/10 pages. When someone goes off piste with a post about pottery. Then it fades slowly away.
Monet by page 8 ..... ok

I can just about see what you did there wink

freddytin

1,184 posts

258 months

Monday 21st October 2019
quotequote all


Marton Drive ?

emperorburger

1,484 posts

97 months

Monday 21st October 2019
quotequote all
I'm more interested in the windows boarded up on the house opposite. Council estate by any chance?

anonymous-user

85 months

Monday 21st October 2019
quotequote all
Just waiting for a Brexit remainer to moan about it and an RX protester to glue themselves to it. biglaugh

Peter3442

450 posts

99 months

Monday 21st October 2019
quotequote all
Remoaner reply: it must belong to Boris. It's one of his legal loopholes.

abzmike

12,115 posts

137 months

Monday 21st October 2019
quotequote all
Anyone looked it up on the MIB yet?

DickyC

58,853 posts

229 months

Monday 21st October 2019
quotequote all
Chozza said:
Monet by page 8 ..... ok

nono

Definitely Manet.

Wiccan of Darkness

1,916 posts

114 months

Monday 21st October 2019
quotequote all
DickyC said:
Chozza said:
Monet by page 8 ..... ok

nono

Definitely Manet.
Well it clearly doesn't have Degas to make the Van Gogh.....

davebem

747 posts

208 months

Monday 21st October 2019
quotequote all
What a wankel for leaving it like that.

nonsequitur

20,083 posts

147 months

Tuesday 22nd October 2019
quotequote all
Chozza said:
nonsequitur said:
I'll put monet on 8/10 pages. When someone goes off piste with a post about pottery. Then it fades slowly away.
Monet by page 8 ..... ok

Exellent!thumbup