Ms. Begum can not return, rules Supreme Court.
Ms. Begum can not return, rules Supreme Court.
TOPIC CLOSED
TOPIC CLOSED
Author
Discussion

eldar

Original Poster:

25,300 posts

226 months

Friday 26th February 2021
quotequote all
There used to be a thread on this subject, i thought. Seems not.

Ms. Begum will not be permitted to return.

Shamima Begum: 'IS bride' cannot return to UK, court rules https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-56209007

FNG

4,773 posts

254 months

Friday 26th February 2021
quotequote all
In before the Windsor Davies pic.

Psycho Warren

3,087 posts

143 months

Friday 26th February 2021
quotequote all
What a shame. lol.

Chris32345

2,141 posts

92 months

Friday 26th February 2021
quotequote all
Jesus Christ some.sense from the court rather then spouting there normal human rights bs

PorkInsider

6,624 posts

171 months

Friday 26th February 2021
quotequote all
The ruling is that she can't return to the UK to fight her case.

She can still appeal against the revocation of citizenship from elsewhere, though, so may still be able to return to the UK at some point.

anonymous-user

84 months

Friday 26th February 2021
quotequote all
She can go back to where she clearly belongs, then. We don't want a threat like her living on our soil.

croyde

26,454 posts

260 months

Friday 26th February 2021
quotequote all
Apparently she has a Bangladeshi passport or some connection to that country.

Mentioned on the radio this morning.

Seems Bangladesh have told her to FO!

Carrot

7,294 posts

232 months

Friday 26th February 2021
quotequote all
croyde said:
Apparently she has a Bangladeshi passport or some connection to that country.

Mentioned on the radio this morning.

Seems Bangladesh have told her to FO!
Good!

MK1RS Bruce

782 posts

168 months

Friday 26th February 2021
quotequote all
This has got to be one of the most ridiculous things the UK gov has done in recent years and thats saying something! How long before a legal case is won and she is awarded significant damages, paid for by us the UK Tax payer. We are likely already footing the bill for the appeals and supreme court!

As much as I agree that we don't want people like that walking around freely in the UK, I think its far better to have her in the UK and monitored than it is to have extremists wandering around unchecked.

Bangladesh aren't going to grant her citizenship so you then end up with someone who is stateless and therefore I imagine able to claim asylum in any number of countries.

This is no different to exporting our rubbish to other countries to deal with. The UK needs to take responsibility and deal with her accordingly, repatriate, war crimes trial, jail!


Aston Traveller

422 posts

178 months

Friday 26th February 2021
quotequote all
Carrot said:
croyde said:
Apparently she has a Bangladeshi passport or some connection to that country.

Mentioned on the radio this morning.

Seems Bangladesh have told her to FO!
Good!
Under international agreement you cannot make someone stateless. The U.K. government said that as her father was Bangladeshi she entitled to a Banglash passport under family association. Bangladesh has denied this. Her father now resides in Bangladesh most of the time now. So depending on whether she is entitled to a Bangladesh passport she may be stateless.

As she married a Dutch chap I don’t know whether she would be entitled to a Dutch passport through him if the marriage was legally recognised. I would doubt she would want to go there except as a route to the U.K. where she has friends and family. God knows what this is costing the taxpayers in fees.

rampageturke

2,625 posts

192 months

The Rotrex Kid

35,034 posts

190 months

TOPIC CLOSED
TOPIC CLOSED