Confusingly Signposted Reduced Speed Limits.
Confusingly Signposted Reduced Speed Limits.
Author
Discussion

Blakewater

Original Poster:

4,563 posts

188 months

Saturday 4th June 2011
quotequote all
A road near me was reduced from an NSL to a 50mph limit a couple of years ago except for a small section between the Blackburn With Darwen boundary where the road goes into Bolton and a 30mph limit.
Drive out of the 30mph in Bolton towards Blackburn and you pass NSL signs and then 50mph signs at the Blackburn boundary. Presumably the local authority in Bolton didn't see the need for the speed limit reduction. Drive the other way into Bolton and as you pass the boundary there is no NSL sign indicating the end of the 50mph limit and the start of the short 60mph limit before the 30mph limit.
If you have the patience to scan along the road on Google Streetview and look back here's the link to see what I'm describing.

http://maps.google.co.uk/maps?f=q&source=s_q&a...

Effectively the road is a 60mph limit in one direction and a 50mph limit in the other. At the opposite end of the road there are no large 50mph limit signs at the beginning of the road as you come off the roundabout at the motorway junction. Only a small reminder type sign a good way up the road. You can go onto the road from a motorway, an NSL single carriageway road or another couple or roads that have been reduced from NSL to 50mph more recently than this one. Depending on which road you've joined this one from you'll have different ideas about what the speed limit is. There are signs along the road saying mobile speed cameras may be in operation. Can a 50mph limit be enforced if the signs are so confusing and the job of putting signs up to indicate the new speed limit seemingly hasn't been finished off properly? I'm not condoning exceeding the 50mph limit but half the people on the road are going to think it's an NSL.

streaky

19,311 posts

280 months

Sunday 5th June 2011
quotequote all
The Court would have to decide, but in general, I would suggest that:

1) Incorrect signing might invalidate a posted limit (or limits), should negate enforcement, and can result in a 'Not Guilty' verdict.

2) "Confusing" signage might not be seen as such by the Court.

3) When leaving one speed limit for another, the new limit applies only when the first sign is passed (which might be a repeater sign). Enforcement should fail in the face of a defence of "no sign" if booked in the area between entering the new limit and the first visible sign. This has been discussed on here several times in the past year or so. A search on "speed limit" and "sign" posted by "tvrgit" and "dvd" [apologies to others]might be rewarding.

It is not impossible for two different speed limits to exist (or be signed) on opposing lanes ... albeit, it would (should) be exceptionally rare on single carriageways - as it is doubtful that the justification for a lower limit could reasonably apply in one direction only. Differential speed limits on dual carriageways do exist in the UK.

Streaky

Dwight VanDriver

6,583 posts

275 months

Sunday 5th June 2011
quotequote all
What does it say in the Speed restriction Order for that area. TRO's for speed itemises the extent of the limit in yards. May be as Streaky says, for some ubknown reason they have imposed a slower in and faster out. All should be revealed in the Order.
dvd

saaby93

32,038 posts

209 months

Sunday 5th June 2011
quotequote all
While youre finding out orders you could look up reasons for the 30
http://maps.google.co.uk/maps?f=q&source=s_q&a...
What percentage of drivers do you think are travelling less than 30 as they cross the imaginary line between the posts?

Blakewater

Original Poster:

4,563 posts

188 months

Sunday 5th June 2011
quotequote all
I can't find anything on the Internet now. The changes were made quite a while ago. I can find a document relating to a review of speed limit changes on the Riley Green Switch Road and other roads around it which connect to the A675. They've either been taken off the Internet or the correct procedures were never followed in the first place and the Speed Restriction Orders were never posted. I've never seen any for Blackburn With Darwen Council or Lancashire County Council even though they're reducing a lot of speed limits at the moment. I've heard or people getting out of speeding fines because procedures relating to Speed Restriction Orders were never followed.
By the way, I haven't been booked for speeding on this road in case that's what some people are thinking, I'm just curious about the signs.

rodney59

424 posts

279 months

Sunday 5th June 2011
quotequote all
This here http://maps.google.co.uk/maps?f=q&source=s_q&a...

shows the road is 50mph, but as you say there are no terminal 50mph signs at the roundabout.
I see also that there are speed camera signs along the road. I wonder what speed they think it is?

streaky

19,311 posts

280 months

Sunday 5th June 2011
quotequote all
rodney59 said:
This here http://maps.google.co.uk/maps?f=q&source=s_q&a...

shows the road is 50mph, but as you say there are no terminal 50mph signs at the roundabout.
I see also that there are speed camera signs along the road. I wonder what speed they think it is?
I don't think the signs care.

Streaky

Mill Wheel

6,149 posts

227 months

Monday 6th June 2011
quotequote all
streaky said:
I don't think the signs care.

Streaky
Just as well, or this one would be in casualty by now...!


Read TSM 2008 regarding misleading signs - it has quite specific points to make.

streaky

19,311 posts

280 months

Monday 6th June 2011
quotequote all
This?

Traffic Signs Manual 241 1 said:
Signs that do not strictly follow the Regulations and the Directions (see para 1.4 in respect of Northern Ireland), or have not been specially authorised are not lawfully placed and the speed limit might be unenforceable. To avoid the risk of failed prosecutions, it is of the greatest importance that speed limits be signed lawfully. It is equally important that speed limits be signed clearly and in accordance with this guidance, so that at no time will drivers be in any doubt about the prevailing limit.
Streaky

saaby93

32,038 posts

209 months

Monday 6th June 2011
quotequote all
streaky said:
This?
Traffic Signs Manual 241 1 said:
Signs that do not strictly follow the Regulations and the Directions (see para 1.4 in respect of Northern Ireland), or have not been specially authorised are not lawfully placed and the speed limit might be unenforceable. To avoid the risk of failed prosecutions, it is of the greatest importance that speed limits be signed lawfully. It is equally important that speed limits be signed clearly and in accordance with this guidance, so that at no time will drivers be in any doubt about the prevailing limit.
Streaky
It's only of greatest importance smile

Mill Wheel

6,149 posts

227 months

Monday 6th June 2011
quotequote all
streaky said:
This?

Traffic Signs Manual 241 1 said:
Signs that do not strictly follow the Regulations and the Directions (see para 1.4 in respect of Northern Ireland), or have not been specially authorised are not lawfully placed and the speed limit might be unenforceable. To avoid the risk of failed prosecutions, it is of the greatest importance that speed limits be signed lawfully. It is equally important that speed limits be signed clearly and in accordance with this guidance, so that at no time will drivers be in any doubt about the prevailing limit.
Streaky
Yeah... that is it!
I was hoping that by NOT quoting it, more people would go and read the very worthy document themselves!

It should be appended to the Highway Code IMHO!

streaky

19,311 posts

280 months

Monday 6th June 2011
quotequote all
saaby93 said:
streaky said:
This?
Traffic Signs Manual 241 1 said:
Signs that do not strictly follow the Regulations and the Directions (see para 1.4 in respect of Northern Ireland), or have not been specially authorised are not lawfully placed and the speed limit might be unenforceable. To avoid the risk of failed prosecutions, it is of the greatest importance that speed limits be signed lawfully. It is equally important that speed limits be signed clearly and in accordance with this guidance, so that at no time will drivers be in any doubt about the prevailing limit.
Streaky
It's only of greatest importance smile
Note that to the purist, "the greatest importance" means not only that nothing else is more important, but that nothing else has similar importance. It's a shame, therefore, that the very next sentence starts: "It is equally important ..."

Love and Marriage by Frank Sinatra comes to mind. I seem to be 'in' to lyrics today. wink

Streaky

JuniorD

9,013 posts

254 months

Monday 2nd June 2014
quotequote all
Not wanting to start a new thread, thought here might be a good place for my question.

What is the speed limit here?


JumboBeef

3,772 posts

208 months

Monday 2nd June 2014
quotequote all
Some oink has turned one sign around (I'm guessing the one on the right). I assume there is a build up area either in front or behind the camera: that is the 30 and the other way is 60.

BertieWooster

4,112 posts

195 months

Monday 2nd June 2014
quotequote all
My guess would be that the sign on the right (showing the NSL) has been rotated 180 degrees.

FunkyNige

9,858 posts

306 months

Monday 2nd June 2014
quotequote all
I see that twice on my way into work, assumed someone had turned one sign round but they're both the same way round as your photo!

Cliftonite

8,753 posts

169 months

Monday 2nd June 2014
quotequote all
JuniorD said:
Not wanting to start a new thread, thought here might be a good place for my question.

What is the speed limit here?

Depends on which side of the road you will be driving? It's a new system to facilitate overtaking?

smile


ferrariF50lover

1,834 posts

257 months

Monday 2nd June 2014
quotequote all
Ahahaha, I came here to ask an identical question in identical circumstances. Of course, one sign has been rotated, thing is, the road is exactly the same in both directions, so the 100% difference in limit between one way and the other is impossible to fathom. Which sign has been turned? Not a clue.



Simon.

JuniorD

9,013 posts

254 months

Monday 2nd June 2014
quotequote all
Very good, the RHS must be rotated. I didn't think to look back at the signs from the other side. I took the pick a couple of years ago so can't quite remember where it was to check hehe