Parking Mad on BBC
TOPIC CLOSED
TOPIC CLOSED
Author
Discussion

Oz83

Original Poster:

720 posts

170 months

Thursday 24th April 2014
quotequote all
I've just had the unfortunate experience of watching this BBC programme (I live in Sweden and was looking for the snooker).

In one of the 'stories' there were bailiffs using number plate recognition to identify vehicles with outstanding parking fines, pull the vehicle over, then request immediate payment of the fine by credit or debit card. The bailiffs also said to the driver that they were not allowed to leave until the fine is paid. They also threatened to seize their cars and even looked in the boot of a car for property to seize.

I assume this practice is legal or it wouldn't be televised, but what authority does a bailiff have to prevent a person from just driving away? Surely one must be under arrest (by the police) to be prevented from leaving?

Anyway, best of luck to UK motorists facing the parking authorities, looks like you need it!


selym

9,581 posts

202 months

Thursday 24th April 2014
quotequote all
What would the deal be if they stood in the road and your foot just 'slipped' off the clutch?

anonymous-user

85 months

Thursday 24th April 2014
quotequote all
Didn't seem like the cleverest place to carry out enforcement in a bus stop on a right hand bend?

TheRainMaker

7,889 posts

273 months

Thursday 24th April 2014
quotequote all
selym said:
What would the deal be if they stood in the road and your foot just 'slipped' off the clutch?
Jail.

73mark

774 posts

158 months

Thursday 24th April 2014
quotequote all
The way around it is,pay the first fine £30-70 and the bailiffs are out of a job.
£70 fine turns into £540 . confused

TheRainMaker

7,889 posts

273 months

Thursday 24th April 2014
quotequote all
73mark said:
£70 fine turns into £540 . confused
I didn't get that either, totally stupid.

Its not even £70, £35 if you pay within 30 days or something like that anyway.

Oz83

Original Poster:

720 posts

170 months

Thursday 24th April 2014
quotequote all
I just stumbled on the other thread about the same subject. So the police are aiding private companies to collect civil fines. Slippery slope this.

tbc

3,017 posts

206 months

Friday 25th April 2014
quotequote all
They are vultures

Pulling people over at a bend on a bus stop to the patronising bh.

I would just do the right thing and drive off

catch me if you can you bds

Mike_Mac

664 posts

231 months

Friday 25th April 2014
quotequote all
Wasn't the point that the people they were pulling over weren't just owing a parking ticket, but had ignored it, ignored the court action and then ignored demands for payment from the court up until that point? Hence why it had escalated into the fine, plus charges on top of several hundred pounds?

I, personally don't have much sympathy for someone who ignores something like this. If you get a ticket and it's a fair one - pay it (I have biggrin)! If it's not - Challenge it (I also have biggrin)! But to just ignore it is pathetic and, quite frankly, I have no problems with them being pulled up as a result.

Also I believe it was the Police Officers with the Bailiffs who have the power to stop the car - as has been discussed here before. While I don't like the Police being used in this way per se - if it catches serial fine dodgers as above then I can live with it!

eatcustard

1,003 posts

158 months

Friday 25th April 2014
quotequote all
Just to add a twist to this, what would happen for example, I buy a car from someone with out standing parking tickets and I get stopped, can they take the car, working on the assumption I purchased the car a few days before, so will not show me as the new owner at the DVLA and I am not carrying a receipt of purchase.


Snowboy

8,028 posts

182 months

Friday 25th April 2014
quotequote all
eatcustard said:
Just to add a twist to this, what would happen for example, I buy a car from someone with out standing parking tickets and I get stopped, can they take the car, working on the assumption I purchased the car a few days before, so will not show me as the new owner at the DVLA and I am not carrying a receipt of purchase.
What would most likely happen is an uncomfortable and confusing 10-20 minutes where a few facts are checked, at which point you could leave.
A call to an insurance company could show a change of owner.
On the bright side, there are a few cops ten yards away who you could call on for help. smile

The big problem with the anpr balifs is when they operate alone and pick up parked cars. That's when a new owner wouldn't even have chance to argue.

Duke147

629 posts

179 months

Friday 25th April 2014
quotequote all
I was a little confused by the taxi driver situation - were they not threatening to remove his "tools of the trade?" I didn't think that this was allowed?

V8forweekends

2,504 posts

155 months

Friday 25th April 2014
quotequote all
Already discussed in some detail here-

http://www.pistonheads.com/xforums/topic.asp?h=0&a...

Snowboy

8,028 posts

182 months

Friday 25th April 2014
quotequote all
Duke147 said:
I was a little confused by the taxi driver situation - were they not threatening to remove his "tools of the trade?" I didn't think that this was allowed?
I don't think they can take a licensed taxi.
But, if it's not licensed or the licence is not in order then there might be some additional legislation to consider.

The fact that this has reached ccj level means several letters have been sent to the address and possibly someone has tried to visit.
For a licensed taxi driver to ignore all of that it's more than likely there's something odd going on.

jesta1865

3,453 posts

240 months

Friday 25th April 2014
quotequote all
Snowboy said:
The fact that this has reached ccj level means several letters have been sent to the address and possibly someone has tried to visit.
although mine wasn't for parking tickets, the first i knew i had a ccj against my name was the day i read the letter from the court saying i'd been found against as i hadn't turned up. not surprising as i never got anything from anyone saying it was happening.

lucky for me i got it sorted and the ccj is no more, but it can happen.

V8forweekends

2,504 posts

155 months

Friday 25th April 2014
quotequote all
jesta1865 said:
although mine wasn't for parking tickets, the first i knew i had a ccj against my name was the day i read the letter from the court saying i'd been found against as i hadn't turned up. not surprising as i never got anything from anyone saying it was happening.

lucky for me i got it sorted and the ccj is no more, but it can happen.
What was the CCJ for? Was that really the first you had heard of the matter (not just the CCJ?) I would be really surprised if you didn't know someone wanted money off you (however justified or not) at all until you got a CCJ.

Red Devil

13,534 posts

239 months

Friday 25th April 2014
quotequote all
eatcustard said:
Just to add a twist to this, what would happen for example, I buy a car from someone with out standing parking tickets and I get stopped, can they take the car, working on the assumption I purchased the car a few days before, so will not show me as the new owner at the DVLA and I am not carrying a receipt of purchase.
As already said this has been covered in the other thread.

The warrant of execution will specify the vehicle's VRM, so they can and they will.
It can be unlawful distress - http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthr...
However, how the Part 6 legislation now on the statute book sits with that has yet to be resolved.

Don't take any notice of Snowboy, he lives in a Utopian world where bailiffs will always work within the rules.
He also has this naïve belief that the police will intervene on an innocent motorists behalf.


grumpy

970 posts

272 months

Friday 25th April 2014
quotequote all
tbc said:
They are vultures

Pulling people over at a bend on a bus stop to the patronising bh.

I would just do the right thing and drive off

catch me if you can you bds
I'm sure I'd feel like this as well but wasn't it the police that were pulling in the cars?

Snowboy

8,028 posts

182 months

Friday 25th April 2014
quotequote all
V8forweekends said:
What was the CCJ for? Was that really the first you had heard of the matter (not just the CCJ?) I would be really surprised if you didn't know someone wanted money off you (however justified or not) at all until you got a CCJ.
Had you changed address at some point?
That's what happened to me.

Snowboy

8,028 posts

182 months

Friday 25th April 2014
quotequote all
Red Devil said:
As already said this has been covered in the other thread.

The warrant of execution will specify the vehicle's VRM, so they can and they will.
It can be unlawful distress - http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthr...
However, how the Part 6 legislation now on the statute book sits with that has yet to be resolved.

Don't take any notice of Snowboy, he lives in a Utopian world where bailiffs will always work within the rules.
He also has this naïve belief that the police will intervene on an innocent motorists behalf.
If you can find any evidence of a new owner getting into trouble like this at a police based stop and the cops not offering assistance when balif attempted an illegal seizure please share it.
Otherwise I'm just ignoring your comments as typical anti-police sentiment and bluster.

TOPIC CLOSED
TOPIC CLOSED