Self incriminating video - without due care and attn?
Discussion
http://youtu.be/IsH1DkuPxko
At 2:57 stops at ped crossing
At 3:00 moves off not paying attention, looking into camera in fact
At 3:01 nearly strikes person on crossing
At 3:05 notices 'survivor', calls them a chav
Hmmm.
At 2:57 stops at ped crossing
At 3:00 moves off not paying attention, looking into camera in fact
At 3:01 nearly strikes person on crossing
At 3:05 notices 'survivor', calls them a chav
Hmmm.
He should be arrested and charged for the crappest car review ever. I just about made it through the video to the incident without dropping dead of boredom. How anyone can review an amazing car like that and make it so dull is beyond me!
He was clearly not paying attention at the crossing though.
He was clearly not paying attention at the crossing though.
technogogo said:
http://youtu.be/IsH1DkuPxko
At 2:57 stops at ped crossing
At 3:00 moves off not paying attention, looking into camera in fact
At 3:01 nearly strikes person on crossing
At 3:05 notices 'survivor', calls them a chav
Hmmm.
I see nothing mate. Unless there was some serious jealousy and envy on the investigating coppers part, there is no way they would prosecute with this. The video shows nothing and he will simply say he made it up to make the video more interesting.At 2:57 stops at ped crossing
At 3:00 moves off not paying attention, looking into camera in fact
At 3:01 nearly strikes person on crossing
At 3:05 notices 'survivor', calls them a chav
Hmmm.
If the police see no offences in this video http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=3c2_1399488205 that was given to them how in the world would they prosecute with Lord Aleems vido that shows the inside of the car?
Who is this guy? Surely with all those cars he must have come to the attention of PH at some point.
Not the best of reviews but he's not a professional TV presenter, just some guy with a load of cars, so on the basis of that vid, fair play to him. It might pay him to go on a TV presentation course.
As for the incident with they chav....I can't see what he did wrong.
Not the best of reviews but he's not a professional TV presenter, just some guy with a load of cars, so on the basis of that vid, fair play to him. It might pay him to go on a TV presentation course.
As for the incident with they chav....I can't see what he did wrong.
https://www.google.co.uk/webhp?sourceid=chrome-ins...
Yes, he's well known around here.
I don't particularly like him, but he was hardly driving like a cock and certainly doesn't deserve another bashing in this thread.
Yes, he's well known around here.
I don't particularly like him, but he was hardly driving like a cock and certainly doesn't deserve another bashing in this thread.
His family own a car-hire business IIRC.
He doesn't give way correctly, which is probably because he's too busy looking and talking to the camera. I'm not sure whether or not if amounts to due care.
Would people feel differently if he had struck the pedestrian if he had crossed a second or two before whilst the driver wasn't looking to his right?
He doesn't give way correctly, which is probably because he's too busy looking and talking to the camera. I'm not sure whether or not if amounts to due care.
Would people feel differently if he had struck the pedestrian if he had crossed a second or two before whilst the driver wasn't looking to his right?
Eclassy said:
If the police see no offences in this video http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=3c2_1399488205 that was given to them how in the world would they prosecute with Lord Aleems vido that shows the inside of the car?
How are they like for like? La Liga said:
His family own a car-hire business IIRC.
Would people feel differently if he had struck the pedestrian if he had crossed a second or two before whilst the driver wasn't looking to his right?
Yes.Would people feel differently if he had struck the pedestrian if he had crossed a second or two before whilst the driver wasn't looking to his right?
Part of the problem with the way we are today is that we spend so much time worrying about what might have happened that when something bad actually does happen most people s
t themselves."Think of the children" Yes the ones who have been taught that all traffic has to stop at a red light and so never check to see if someone is being a knobjocky.
La Liga said:
ow are they like for like?
Ah eclassy has rolled out the video where he claimed a lunatic was making threats towards him again. I struggled to see any P.O offences but the way he was going on about it the guy was trying to rip his head off. The comments on the video say it all.
Edited by Greendubber on Friday 6th June 11:10
Edited by Greendubber on Friday 6th June 11:10
Rude-boy said:
La Liga said:
His family own a car-hire business IIRC.
Would people feel differently if he had struck the pedestrian if he had crossed a second or two before whilst the driver wasn't looking to his right?
Yes.Would people feel differently if he had struck the pedestrian if he had crossed a second or two before whilst the driver wasn't looking to his right?
Part of the problem with the way we are today is that we spend so much time worrying about what might have happened that when something bad actually does happen most people s
t themselves."Think of the children" Yes the ones who have been taught that all traffic has to stop at a red light and so never check to see if someone is being a knobjocky.
Greendubber said:
La Liga said:
How are they like for like?
Ah eclassy has rolled out the video where he claimed a lunatic was making threats towards him again. I struggled to see any P.O offences but the way he was going on about it the guy was trying to rip his head off. The comments on the video say it all.
La Liga said:
ow are they like for like?
Never said they were like for like. Mine shows the outside of a car, on the road, this video shows the inside of a car and a man driving. I missed the guy flicking the bird at him but that looks to me like a chav with some jealousy issues and doesnt prove OP claims. OP should have said driving over his heels. If it was his toes, the ped would be minced meat.
Eclassy said:
Never said they were like for like.
So why then are you using a total non-event as a reference point? The fact the police wouldn't waste their time with some bloke knocking on a window means nothing here and is wholly irrelevant. Eclassy said:
I missed the guy flicking the bird at him but that looks to me like a chav with some jealousy issues and doesnt prove OP claims.
So because someone's made a gesture because a driver has failed to give way them to them at a crossing means it looks like "a chav with some jealousy issues"? What total evidenceless rubbish. If exactly the same scenario had occurred with the driver in a less expensive car that thought wouldn't even occur to you. The OP isn't claiming, he's asking a question.
Forums | Speed, Plod & the Law | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff