Revision of penalties. End of war on the motorist. Not.
Discussion
Maximum fine for motorway speeding now £10, 000.
Dual carriageway £4, 000.
Four times the previous figures.
Mobile phone fines to increase too.
Not just motoring fines. TV licence evasion. 4, 000 too.
Also first time magistrates will be able to impose unlimited fines for level 5 offences.
link
Dual carriageway £4, 000.
Four times the previous figures.
Mobile phone fines to increase too.
Not just motoring fines. TV licence evasion. 4, 000 too.
Also first time magistrates will be able to impose unlimited fines for level 5 offences.
link
chris1roll said:
When was the last time someone was fined the existing £2500 maximum for speeding?
I don't recall even the cases deemed worthy of the national news being that high, but I might be mistaken.
As the actual level of the fine is based on the offenders income, probably the last time a very rich person was done for speeding on a motorway. A football manager, for example.I don't recall even the cases deemed worthy of the national news being that high, but I might be mistaken.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/football/article-...
It's a general increase in the maximum fines for all offences, BTW. Not specifically for motoring offences. So it doesn't really have anything to do with wars on motorists, though pretending it does is probably a good way to sell newspapers.
Gargamel said:
What was £2500 worth in 1991 ?
About £4400 in today's money - http://swanlowpark.co.uk/rpiannual.jsp so an increase was inevitable at some point - but this is quite a bit above inflation.aw51 121565 said:
Who will enforce this? 

The new HADECS 3 system will. A single camera system that can monitor 5 lanes if needed. Shows the speed of each car in each lane with 3 colour bands; 

green = ok
amber = within tolerance
red = you've nicked son
Proposed to be enforced at 10% of road speed limit + 2mph
80MPH on a motorway would mean a fixed penalty.
Still laughing?
Devil's advocate:
Funny old world isn't it, the full weight of the law must be brought down on offenders but only on laws we agree with?
The rules have to be vigorously enforced in almost every other situation, but we're being persecuted by better detection and increased fines when we're breaking the law?
Funny old world isn't it, the full weight of the law must be brought down on offenders but only on laws we agree with?
The rules have to be vigorously enforced in almost every other situation, but we're being persecuted by better detection and increased fines when we're breaking the law?
LordFlathead said:
aw51 121565 said:
Who will enforce this? 

The new HADECS 3 system will. A single camera system that can monitor 5 lanes if needed. Shows the speed of each car in each lane with 3 colour bands; 

green = ok
amber = within tolerance
red = you've nicked son
Proposed to be enforced at 10% of road speed limit + 2mph
80MPH on a motorway would mean a fixed penalty.
Still laughing?
Einion Yrth said:
Oh dear, it seems my reg plate has fallen off/ become broken. No-one around to spot that 99% of the time.
That is one way of doing it. Unfortunately you can only use that excuse once as after that I would imagine the offence would become "Perverting the cause of justice" or similar.charltjr said:
Funny old world isn't it, the full weight of the law must be brought down on offenders but only on laws we agree with?
The rules have to be vigorously enforced in almost every other situation, but we're being persecuted by better detection and increased fines when we're breaking the law?
I have no problem with the concept of crimes being punished. My issue is that the only offences that appear to be punished are the profitable ones that require little investigation; laws in these cases seem to be enforced with disproportional enthusiasm.The rules have to be vigorously enforced in almost every other situation, but we're being persecuted by better detection and increased fines when we're breaking the law?
Forums | Speed, Plod & the Law | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff



