10 Years Long Enough?
Author
Discussion

longshot

Original Poster:

3,286 posts

229 months

Wednesday 11th June 2014
quotequote all
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2652927/Si...

Seems like he got off light to me.

Am I just out of touch or do you think he deserved a longer sentence?

Koofler

616 posts

197 months

Wednesday 11th June 2014
quotequote all
Set them on fire and sling them in a ditch. Goes for any crime that goes beyond the pail.

FGM. Stealing that old boys medals. Abusing the elderly etc etc.

longshot

Original Poster:

3,286 posts

229 months

Wednesday 11th June 2014
quotequote all
You want to set women on fire? eek

myvision

2,132 posts

167 months

Wednesday 11th June 2014
quotequote all
Should be life.

Martin_M

2,071 posts

258 months

Wednesday 11th June 2014
quotequote all
The joke is, 10 years isn't even 10 years in this damn country!

Words to describe what sort of punishment these animals deserve isn't allowed on here.

What I would like to ask the legal experts on here is how on earth can a judge regard such a sentence as acceptable? From my limited knowledge of the law, I realise that some (maybe all?) crimes are subject to a maximum punishment but surely 10 years isn't the maximum for a crime such as this?

ruff'n'smov

1,092 posts

180 months

Wednesday 11th June 2014
quotequote all
That is horrific.
Should be a life sentence minimum 15 years served, will he only serve 5ish.

ruff'n'smov

1,092 posts

180 months

Wednesday 11th June 2014
quotequote all
That is horrific.
Should be a life sentence minimum 15 years served, will he only serve 5ish.

aw51 121565

4,773 posts

264 months

Wednesday 11th June 2014
quotequote all
Isn't hindsight wonderful (in several ways as per the report)? rolleyes

frown

ging84

9,548 posts

177 months

Wednesday 11th June 2014
quotequote all
when someone can slash his wife's feet with a kitchen knife because she didn't make his sandwiches and in a later separate attack iron her face because she didn't iron his shirt, and escape jail with a suspended sentence due to having a stressful job, no sentence will ever surprise me any more

Koofler

616 posts

197 months

Thursday 12th June 2014
quotequote all
longshot said:
You want to set women on fire? eek
Not her, the grand father.

But, one law for all so in theory yes I suppose. That nanny who let her pedo neighbour have access to the kids she was looking after, because she fancied him. There's a ditch and a can of kerosine with her name on it.

Retroman

975 posts

164 months

Thursday 12th June 2014
quotequote all
Prison and the sentences are more about rehabilitation these days than punishment.
Tougher prisons and tougher sentences breeds harder criminals.

Mk3Spitfire

2,921 posts

159 months

Thursday 12th June 2014
quotequote all
Retroman said:
Prison and the sentences are more about rehabilitation these days than punishment.
Tougher prisons and tougher sentences breeds harder criminals.
Except prisons are far from tough these days. I know several local gents who will actively look to go back inside, because it's an easy life.

Retroman

975 posts

164 months

Thursday 12th June 2014
quotequote all
Look at it this way.

Sweden's prisons and sentences are a lot easier going than ours and they have a much lower violent crime rate than here.

USA has death sentence in some states, harsh punishments and long sentences but they have much higher violent crime rate than here.

I know it's not as simple as that, and from the family's perspective the eye stabber in the story posted is a complete joke with no justice but in the bigger picture, harsher sentences doesn't do much (if anything) to reduce violent crime from happening. Better on a bigger scale (where possible) to try and rehabilitate offenders so they when they eventually go out they can hopefully contribute something into society.
Better for everyone (providing it works) than have them spend much longer in prison at the cost of the taxpayer.

longshot

Original Poster:

3,286 posts

229 months

Thursday 12th June 2014
quotequote all
The reason I posted was not only because the sentence is too short (imo) but also I would think that the victim, who's life he has already ruined with this particularly vindictive attack, would rest easier knowing he is locked away somewhere.

It would seem that her supposed actions bit him deep inside. I don't know how you rehabilitate that out of someone.

Mk3Spitfire

2,921 posts

159 months

Thursday 12th June 2014
quotequote all
Retroman said:
Look at it this way.
It's a nice idea, but i have seen first hand the effect of too lenient a punishment. A lot of these people aren't interested in rehabilitation. They do something wrong, get a slap on the wrist, and think "well, that was easy" and go out and do it again. If the reward outweighs the risk, the majority of these people will go on offending.

Moonhawk

10,730 posts

250 months

Thursday 12th June 2014
quotequote all
Shockingly short sentence considering the crime.......and to top it off - no outrage for his use of the p-word either......

Dave Hedgehog

16,371 posts

235 months

Thursday 12th June 2014
quotequote all
myvision said:
Should be life.
served

scum like that have no place in society ever! rot in a box somewhere

Jasandjules

72,681 posts

260 months

Thursday 12th June 2014
quotequote all
No, it's not enough. She is blind now because of this scum.

Starfighter

5,352 posts

209 months

Thursday 12th June 2014
quotequote all
Should the race aspect be an agrivating factor here?

I see the attempted murder is being left on file, step out of line again son and you'll be back in before you an say anything else racist.

HertsBiker

6,443 posts

302 months

Thursday 12th June 2014
quotequote all
Ban religion. It's the only way to stop violence like this. He should be treated as he treated her.