No common sense, just wtf.
No common sense, just wtf.
Author
Discussion

FiF

Original Poster:

48,996 posts

282 months

Friday 27th June 2014
quotequote all
Beggars belief, also no insurance, Seized.




sjc

16,502 posts

301 months

Friday 27th June 2014
quotequote all
Agreed, Viper stripes on a van looks cack.

pork911

7,365 posts

214 months

Friday 27th June 2014
quotequote all
Yep those steps ruin ground clearance

funkyrobot

18,789 posts

259 months

Friday 27th June 2014
quotequote all
You can get tyres for £12! fk me!

smile

jbsportstech

5,069 posts

210 months

Friday 27th June 2014
quotequote all
Is it just me or is no one done for driving works vehicles whilst smoking!

LordFlathead

9,646 posts

289 months

Friday 27th June 2014
quotequote all
Instant dismissal for most people where corporations are concerned but as an owner driver is it a legal requirement to not smoke? I thought it was legal in your own motor but as I don't smoke I don't know irked

sjc

16,502 posts

301 months

Friday 27th June 2014
quotequote all
Should be done for using Tippex while driving.

bigandclever

14,416 posts

269 months

Friday 27th June 2014
quotequote all
jbsportstech said:
Is it just me or is no one done for driving works vehicles whilst smoking!
Smoking isn't allowed in any work vehicle that more than 1 person uses, eg:
-taxis
-buses
-vans
-goods vehicles used by more than 1 driver
-company cars used by more than 1 employee
A worker can smoke in a company car that only they use if their employer agrees.

HTH

Jasandjules

72,681 posts

260 months

Friday 27th June 2014
quotequote all
Holy s**t. How far did they travel like that? Amazed it wasn't in an RTA.

MrTickle

1,825 posts

270 months

Friday 27th June 2014
quotequote all
funkyrobot said:
You can get tyres for £12! fk me!

smile
hehe

Monkeylegend

29,569 posts

262 months

Friday 27th June 2014
quotequote all
A bit extreme just to hide a crack in the windscreen.

Cigarettes in the car doesn't necessarily mean smoking in the car. I feel sure they wouldn't want to break the law.

barker22

1,037 posts

198 months

Friday 27th June 2014
quotequote all
FiF said:
Beggars belief, also no insurance, Seized.

Yep, daft!! the range rover isn't even indicating to go around the truck.

Starfighter

5,352 posts

209 months

Friday 27th June 2014
quotequote all
barker22 said:
FiF said:
Beggars belief, also no insurance, Seized.

Yep, daft!! the range rover isn't even indicating to go around the truck.
May have got it on the off beat or the driver want to avoid the confusion with the possible right turn for some cheap tyres.

mgtony

4,225 posts

221 months

Friday 27th June 2014
quotequote all
Perhaps that tap on the dashboard caused him to do an emergency stop. wobble

Looks like the stuff had just been loaded from the supplier the lorry is delivering to.

Will have to facia the consequences. biggrin

Monkeylegend

29,569 posts

262 months

Friday 27th June 2014
quotequote all
FiF said:
Beggars belief, also no insurance, Seized.



They both have illegal number plates as well. Some people have no regard for the law whatsoever.

Negative Creep

26,140 posts

258 months

Friday 27th June 2014
quotequote all
So what the driver's excuse?

Monkeylegend

29,569 posts

262 months

Friday 27th June 2014
quotequote all
Negative Creep said:
So what the driver's excuse?
Sorry officer but it's gone all droopy.

funkyrobot

18,789 posts

259 months

Friday 27th June 2014
quotequote all
Monkeylegend said:
Negative Creep said:
So what the driver's excuse?
Sorry officer but it's gone all droopy.
He couldn't see what the problem was.

carinaman

25,294 posts

203 months

Friday 27th June 2014
quotequote all
They could have made an effort by pulling the NS lot right over to the NS and then having the OS lot on top of that, one strip but double the depth then it would be the passenger vision obscured and the driver would have some view. It would still be wrong, just less wrong.

Surely someone from the place that sold them that stuff must have thought of doing it that way?

Greendubber

15,377 posts

234 months

Saturday 28th June 2014
quotequote all
carinaman said:
They could have made an effort by pulling the NS lot right over to the NS and then having the OS lot on top of that, one strip but double the depth then it would be the passenger vision obscured and the driver would have some view. It would still be wrong, just less wrong.

Surely someone from the place that sold them that stuff must have thought of doing it that way?
I'd imagine that once it's been paid for they couldn't care less what happens to it or how it's loaded.