One for BiB respecters and supporters to sign?
One for BiB respecters and supporters to sign?
Author
Discussion

carinaman

Original Poster:

25,293 posts

203 months

Thursday 28th August 2014
quotequote all
https://www.change.org/p/theresa-may-mp-grant-poli...

Theresa May is on the ropes. She's on the back foot. Perhaps she'll see sense and reason on the above issue and do something about it for her own political expediency?

Some have said here that Winsor has acknowledged that the cuts bit too deeply. Changing that police pension regulation may be one way to acknowledge that and give something back, a little concession?

ED209

6,027 posts

275 months

Thursday 28th August 2014
quotequote all
They won't even give cops the pensions they signed up for so why would they then give pensions to people who weren't previously entitled to them? The government also ignored the last 100,000 signature petition about pensions so what makes anyone think they will take notice of this one?

(i agree with the sentiment though i just cannot see the government changing things)

TC99

119 posts

154 months

Thursday 28th August 2014
quotequote all
I don't see why police get such gold plated pensions. Nurses, teachers,they have all suffered cuts, take your weight.

Red 4

10,744 posts

218 months

Thursday 28th August 2014
quotequote all
TC99 said:
I don't see why police get such gold plated pensions. Nurses, teachers,they have all suffered cuts, take your weight.
This is about a police officer's widow's pension.

It may help if you read the link (after you've got off your high horse).

Edited by Red 4 on Thursday 28th August 15:25

carinaman

Original Poster:

25,293 posts

203 months

Thursday 28th August 2014
quotequote all
Red 4, perhaps I should have linked to the main petition page:

https://www.change.org/p/theresa-may-mp-grant-poli...

I can see the point ED209 was making, but denying a widow a pension reminds me of the insurance assessor quibbling that those that came back from Afghanistan and Iraq go through when what they get to carry on living with their injuries while Cameron goes on about the 'military covenant'.

Perhaps the petition won't change anything, perhaps petitions don't but it was interesting to hear the stuff on the BBC about the American woman appealing via Twitter directly to the 'caliph' to release her Journalist son and how Islamic State/ISIS/ISIL have used an 'App' to harness all the Twitter accounts of jihadists and wannabe jihadists.

KingNothing

3,348 posts

184 months

Thursday 28th August 2014
quotequote all
Probably won't sign it as I don't agree with the point she's trying to get across.

Bigends

6,195 posts

159 months

Thursday 28th August 2014
quotequote all
These are the current regs she falls foul of

A pension for a widow, widower or surviving civil partner, normally of half of the officer’s pension entitlement, ceases on remarriage, the formation of a new civil partnership or cohabitation. A pension is not payable to a surviving cohabitee who was not married to nor in a civil partnership with the officer.


Randomthoughts

917 posts

164 months

Thursday 28th August 2014
quotequote all
Take the emotion away, and she wants looked after twice over.

I have sympathy with her loss, but two bites of the cherry is a bit of a pisstake. I don't know that I would leave the rules as closed as they seem on the face of it, but I don't know how to fix it properly.

photosnob

1,339 posts

149 months

Thursday 28th August 2014
quotequote all
So did he die of a heart attack after doing his job, or in "the service of others"? 24 year old married to a 40 year old... 4 year old kid. Money clearly doesn't motivate this one.

EDIT - just to add, I don't really hold an opinion on whether she should get the pension. But the use of language annoys me. He didn't die as a result of his job, he died because his heart was in bad shape. Furthermore I don't see that after she gets remarried she would require a widow's pension as she's not a widow anymore.

Edited by photosnob on Thursday 28th August 17:02

carinaman

Original Poster:

25,293 posts

203 months

Thursday 28th August 2014
quotequote all
But if you or I commit a crime we may go to jail, serve our time and become rehabilitated offenders so when those that commit crimes can leave them behind, a bit like PCC Shaun Wright saying 'I've moved on', should someone be worse off because they were married to someone that died and wants to carry on with the rest of their life?

XCP

17,746 posts

259 months

Thursday 28th August 2014
quotequote all
So she had 14 years pension, death in service grant, and probably a life insurance payout. She then (2001) decides to move in with her partner, and now wants 13 years backdated pension? I don't find this a particularly worthy cause I am afraid.

Rovinghawk

13,300 posts

189 months

Thursday 28th August 2014
quotequote all
I might be more supportive if she genuinely needed the money to get by, but this smacks of want rather than necessity.

Pepperami

332 posts

147 months

Friday 29th August 2014
quotequote all
TC99 said:
I don't see why police get such gold plated pensions. Nurses, teachers,they have all suffered cuts, take your weight.
Not what the thread is all about, but I'll answer it anyway. The reason the Police HAD what you call 'gold plated' pensions is because of the size of the wedge paid into the scheme. Paid every 4 weeks but 14% of the GROSS wage goes into the pension fund. That is a massive chunk of money. Valid this has only come in recently but before that it was still 11%. Bearing in mind FRS and MGS had a very similar scheme benefits wise, but paid in a fraction of that percentage from their own pocket.