Benefiting from fraud
Author
Discussion

rigga

Original Poster:

8,807 posts

232 months

Sunday 15th February 2015
quotequote all
Interesting one this and I don't think its been covered before
Well known figure on a large Subaru forum passes away with apparently no will, widow subsequently produces one that leaves everything to her and nothing to his children, then transpires that she has forged several signatures to produce this document, gets caught and sent down
Now it seems that some people think she can still benefit from his estate as being his widow when all said and done.
She started a large thread herself on the forum when he passed with gushing praise for him and how devastated she was, which quickly turned against her when the facts became known, its not an inconsiderate amount of money either, and I feel sorry for his children if indeed they do get nothing out if this, she surly can't benefit from her crime?
The fact she became pregnant with her Turkish lover before going back to court to possibly reduce her term also raises eyebrows
Scoobynet thread
http://www.scoobynet.com/scoobynet-general-1/95550...
Report of her sentence
http://m.thenorthernecho.co.uk/news/11777869._Mani...widow_jailed_after_faking_will_to_get_her_hands_on_1m_estate/?ref=fbshr

PurpleMoonlight

22,362 posts

188 months

Sunday 15th February 2015
quotequote all
She isn't benefiting from crime, she is benefiting by the Laws of intestacy.

rigga

Original Poster:

8,807 posts

232 months

Sunday 15th February 2015
quotequote all
PurpleMoonlight said:
She isn't benefiting from crime, she is benefiting by the Laws of intestacy.
Yes true, I do get that, but the fact that she has committed the crime, it does seem unfair that she gets to benefit
Begs the question if she was involved in her husbands death at all ...

Durzel

12,999 posts

199 months

Sunday 15th February 2015
quotequote all
If she would've benefitted anyway via intestacy, why the need to forge a fake will anyway?

allergictocheese

1,290 posts

144 months

Sunday 15th February 2015
quotequote all
Durzel said:
If she would've benefitted anyway via intestacy, why the need to forge a fake will anyway?
She wouldn't have inherited as much as she wanted using the intestacy rules.

Martin4x4

6,506 posts

163 months

Sunday 15th February 2015
quotequote all
Durzel said:
If she would've benefitted anyway via intestacy, why the need to forge a fake will anyway?
Did he really die intestacy? Or did she destroy his original will?

Always give a signed copy to the real beneficiary.

paintman

7,860 posts

221 months

Sunday 15th February 2015
quotequote all
Greed.
Wonder what attracted her to him in the first place?rolleyes
What's the betting that as soon as the money is gone her new husband will do a runner - if he doesn't while she's banged up.
As for the 'Oh what a surprise, I'm pregnant' I'm with the Judge, just a cynical ploy to try & keep herself out of prison. Its the child - and her late husbands children - I feel sorry for.


Edited by paintman on Sunday 15th February 10:54

Aretnap

1,982 posts

182 months

Sunday 15th February 2015
quotequote all
She doesn't benefit from the fraud. She gets whatever ps he would have been entitled to anyway had she not committed the fraud in the first place, unless someone can find a real will. The difference the fraud makes is that she also gets some free accommodation, courtesy of Her Majesty.

rigga

Original Poster:

8,807 posts

232 months

Sunday 15th February 2015
quotequote all
And yet his children get nothing, I realise life is not always fair, but thats a bum deal indeed.

V8forweekends

2,501 posts

155 months

Sunday 15th February 2015
quotequote all
Rather obvious moral of this story is make sure you have a will (if you care about what happens to your kids if/when you peg it) no matter how far from death you think you are. There are plenty of ways to protect it from being "destroyed" too.

Terminator X

20,905 posts

235 months

Monday 16th February 2015
quotequote all
I remember that thread when it was posted + I bought stuff from Harvey in the past too. Shocking stuff!

TX.

PurpleMoonlight

22,362 posts

188 months

Monday 16th February 2015
quotequote all
rigga said:
And yet his children get nothing, I realise life is not always fair, but thats a bum deal indeed.
Yes they do.

rigga

Original Poster:

8,807 posts

232 months

Monday 16th February 2015
quotequote all
The widow gets the vast majority of the husband's estate, harsh considering her actions regardless if that's the law or not as she was hell bent on getting everything, possibly should be a change to prevent her gaining control of the money and house on her release, but that's just wishful thinking on my part.

TwigtheWonderkid

49,211 posts

181 months

Monday 16th February 2015
quotequote all
rigga said:
And yet his children get nothing, I realise life is not always fair, but thats a bum deal indeed.
How come? She will get the first £250K or whatever the limit is now if you die without a will and they will share the rest. If they get nothing, it means he left under the £250K limit so she gets the lot under the law anyway, so what was the point in her forging a will???

I don't get it.



aw51 121565

4,773 posts

264 months

Monday 16th February 2015
quotequote all
TwigtheWonderkid said:
rigga said:
And yet his children get nothing, I realise life is not always fair, but thats a bum deal indeed.
How come? She will get the first £250K or whatever the limit is now if you die without a will and they will share the rest. If they get nothing, it means he left under the £250K limit so she gets the lot under the law anyway, so what was the point in her forging a will???

I don't get it.
You don't "get it" because - like most people (and this is intended as a compliment, by the way thumbup ) - you don't have the mentality of the kind of 'people' who do shcensoredtty things like this or commit fraud per se.

It's a million quid estate of a person who died intestate, not one worth less than the value (which is £350k or £450k gross, from memory) where the excess above the value gets shared out according to established rules.

I'd suggest that's why she did this - so she and her son got it all rather than just a fair share of it... frown

And - thankfully - she got caught out... loser

TwigtheWonderkid

49,211 posts

181 months

Monday 16th February 2015
quotequote all
aw51 121565 said:
TwigtheWonderkid said:
rigga said:
And yet his children get nothing, I realise life is not always fair, but thats a bum deal indeed.
How come? She will get the first £250K or whatever the limit is now if you die without a will and they will share the rest. If they get nothing, it means he left under the £250K limit so she gets the lot under the law anyway, so what was the point in her forging a will???

I don't get it.
You don't "get it" because - like most people (and this is intended as a compliment, by the way thumbup ) - you don't have the mentality of the kind of 'people' who do shcensoredtty things like this or commit fraud per se.

It's a million quid estate of a person who died intestate, not one worth less than the value (which is £350k or £450k gross, from memory) where the excess above the value gets shared out according to established rules.

I'd suggest that's why she did this - so she and her son got it all rather than just a fair share of it... frown

And - thankfully - she got caught out... loser
I get that. But that being the case, the children will get something. The OP is saying that despite the fact that she got caught, the children will get nothing. That's the bit I don't get. If she's been caught, and the children are still going to get nothing, that means she gets the lot legally, so why did she commit the fraud in the first place? Why did she try and steal something she was going to get legally?

Hol

9,316 posts

231 months

Monday 16th February 2015
quotequote all
Its a shame it has turned out this way.

I had many a chat with the guy at the very early Subaru rolling road days over a cuppa between runs, when he would rock up with an extra 10bhp each time, just with a bit of clever fettling in his garage at home.

The sentiment exhibited in that SN thread is truly genuine, for a genuinely nice guy.

That's what makes it all the more sad to see his name linked to something like this.


konark

1,241 posts

150 months

Wednesday 18th February 2015
quotequote all
If a person dies intestate;
The husband, wife or civil partner keeps all the assets (including property), up to £250,000, and all the personal possessions, whatever their value.

The remainder of the estate will be shared as follows:

the husband, wife or civil partner gets an absolute interest in half of the remainder
the other half is then divided equally between the surviving children

If a son or daughter (or other child where the deceased had a parental role) has already died, their children will inherit in their parent’s place.

So on a million pound estate the greedy bh would have been guaranteed a MINIMUM of £625 grand and(depending on whether the personal possessions were worth a substantial amount) possibly close to a million!

Obviously this wasn't enough!

TwigtheWonderkid

49,211 posts

181 months

Wednesday 18th February 2015
quotequote all
konark said:
So on a million pound estate the greedy bh would have been guaranteed a MINIMUM of £625 grand and(depending on whether the personal possessions were worth a substantial amount) possibly close to a million!
Less IHT (40% on anything over £325K)