Car collection/inspection after a crash?
Car collection/inspection after a crash?
Author
Discussion

justanother5tar

Original Poster:

1,314 posts

156 months

Saturday 21st February 2015
quotequote all
Had a bump, end of Jan, other guy admitted fault at roadside.

I was provided a hire car, and told that someone from 3rd party insurer would come and inspect it.

It's been 3 weeks now, my car hasn't moved, no one has come to look at it.

How long should it take?

LoonR1

26,988 posts

208 months

Saturday 21st February 2015
quotequote all
Who provided the hire car?

justanother5tar

Original Poster:

1,314 posts

156 months

Saturday 21st February 2015
quotequote all
LoonR1 said:
Who provided the hire car?
My insurers passed my details to a firm called Accident Exchange, who they say handle their repairs/claims for repairs? They organised the delivery of the car.

Car is from Europcar.

Edited by justanother5tar on Saturday 21st February 21:37

LoonR1

26,988 posts

208 months

Saturday 21st February 2015
quotequote all
Big surprise. Accident Exchange acting to maximise their own income rather than sorting your claim out.

Get into your insurers to sort it out. All that's happening currently is you're building up a big credit bill for hiring the car.

justanother5tar

Original Poster:

1,314 posts

156 months

Saturday 21st February 2015
quotequote all
LoonR1 said:
Big surprise. Accident Exchange acting to maximise their own income rather than sorting your claim out.

Get into your insurers to sort it out. All that's happening currently is you're building up a big credit bill for hiring the car.
That's what I don't understand, though.

I rang my insurers after the crash, gave details/what happened/who was there etc. and they said that the accident management company would contact me? They said they would organise hire car, collection and delivery of mine.

So should it be my insurers sorting it? Not accident exchange?

Never dealt with anything like this before so it's all confusing me as to who sorts what?

Thanks for the response.

LoonR1

26,988 posts

208 months

Saturday 21st February 2015
quotequote all
Your insurers have subbed it out to AE. Your insurers pocketed a federal fee of probably around£500. AE are lining their own pockets with their extortionate hire rates, that you are potentially liable for.

All this is because the other driver is at fault so his insurers will pick up your obscene hire and repair bill

What car, model, engine do you have and I'll let you know just how expensive it is per day.

justanother5tar

Original Poster:

1,314 posts

156 months

Saturday 21st February 2015
quotequote all
LoonR1 said:
Your insurers have subbed it out to AE. Your insurers pocketed a federal fee of probably around£500.
Oh. So I need to tell them to sort it themselves?

LoonR1 said:
AE are lining their own pockets with their extortionate hire rates, that you are potentially liable for.
What do do you mean I'm liable for? Am I fked?

LoonR1 said:
All this is because the other driver is at fault so his insurers will pick up your obscene hire and repair bill.

What car, model, engine do you have and I'll let you know just how expensive it is per day.
It's a VW CC 2.0TDi BlueMotion Tech, according to a reg checker.

catman

2,504 posts

206 months

Saturday 21st February 2015
quotequote all
I had the misfortune to use AE. The ONLY thing they did right, was to get me a hire car pdq. They were also the least able/professional Company that I've ever dealt with.

I genuinely could have done it better myself.

Tim

justanother5tar

Original Poster:

1,314 posts

156 months

Saturday 21st February 2015
quotequote all
catman said:
I had the misfortune to use AE. The ONLY thing they did right, was to get me a hire car pdq. They were also the least able/professional Company that I've ever dealt with.

I genuinely could have done it better myself.

Tim
Yeah, I had the hire car 11am the next working day!

I've never dealt with this before, I thought this was all how it is usually done. Evidently not.

fk sake.


LoonR1

26,988 posts

208 months

Saturday 21st February 2015
quotequote all
You're not "fked" there was a word in there. POTENTIALLY. Google it.

I'm out now as this has run off into hysteria.

IanMorewood

4,309 posts

279 months

Saturday 21st February 2015
quotequote all
justanother5tar said:
It's a VW CC 2.0TDi BlueMotion Tech, according to a reg checker.
Kerching...

justanother5tar

Original Poster:

1,314 posts

156 months

Saturday 21st February 2015
quotequote all
LoonR1 said:
You're not "fked" there was a word in there. POTENTIALLY. Google it.

I'm out now as this has run off into hysteria.
Hasn't turned into hysteria at all, just wanted to know what was happening!

SteveSteveson

3,209 posts

194 months

Saturday 21st February 2015
quotequote all
LoonR1 said:
You're not "fked" there was a word in there. POTENTIALLY. Google it.

I'm out now as this has run off into hysteria.
Give him a brake. All he wanted to know is why he might be liable... You said that he might be charged quite a lot of money with no explanation. No wonder he is worried.

The answer, I belive, is that sometimes insurance companies try and charge the person for the hire car if they can't show they didn't need it. I.e if you had alternative transport or could have afforded to hire the car yourself and claimed it back rather than using credit hire. I wouldn't worry though. If your like most people and don't have thousands in the bank doing nothing or multipul cars it's fine if the ask, which they may well not.

justanother5tar

Original Poster:

1,314 posts

156 months

Saturday 21st February 2015
quotequote all
IanMorewood said:
Kerching...
Tbh, when it turned up I thought it was a run of the mill Passat.

A quick bit of research seemed to make it out to be an A7/CLS rival?

justanother5tar

Original Poster:

1,314 posts

156 months

Saturday 21st February 2015
quotequote all
SteveSteveson said:
Give him a brake. All he wanted to know is why he might be liable... You said that he might be charged quite a lot of money with no explanation. No wonder he is worried.

The answer, I belive, is that sometimes insurance companies try and charge the person for the hire car if they can't show they didn't need it. I.e if you had alternative transport or could have afforded to hire the car yourself and claimed it back rather than using credit hire. I wouldn't worry though. If your like most people and don't have thousands in the bank doing nothing or multipul cars it's fine if the ask, which they may well not.
Thanks, that seems much clearer.

No, I certainly couldn't afford to hire one myself for this long.

LoonR1

26,988 posts

208 months

Saturday 21st February 2015
quotequote all
SteveSteveson said:
Give him a brake. All he wanted to know is why he might be liable... You said that he might be charged quite a lot of money with no explanation. No wonder he is worried.

The answer, I belive, is that sometimes insurance companies try and charge the person for the hire car if they can't show they didn't need it. I.e if you had alternative transport or could have afforded to hire the car yourself and claimed it back rather than using credit hire. I wouldn't worry though. If your like most people and don't have thousands in the bank doing nothing or multipul cars it's fine if the ask, which they may well not.
And there it is again "the insurance companies try and charge the person". No they don't. Nothing to do with any insurance company and everything to do with the Credit Hire Company.

justanother5tar

Original Poster:

1,314 posts

156 months

Saturday 21st February 2015
quotequote all
LoonR1 said:
And there it is again "the insurance companies try and charge the person". No they don't. Nothing to do with any insurance company and everything to do with the Credit Hire Company.
The credit hire company being Accident Exchange?

Should I ring my insurers and ask them to deal with it? Or is it too late for that?

LoonR1

26,988 posts

208 months

Saturday 21st February 2015
quotequote all
Oh yeah. Accident Exchange are charging £64.47 + VAT per day for the hire.

Sheepshanks

41,279 posts

150 months

Saturday 21st February 2015
quotequote all
justanother5tar said:
That's what I don't understand, though.

I rang my insurers after the crash, gave details/what happened/who was there etc. and they said that the accident management company would contact me? They said they would organise hire car, collection and delivery of mine.
I don't understand why insurers do this to each other. If they don't want to handle non-fault claims themselves they could pass it to the 3rd party's insurer to handle.

Who are you insured with?

LoonR1

26,988 posts

208 months

Saturday 21st February 2015
quotequote all
Sheepshanks said:
I don't understand why insurers do this to each other. If they don't want to handle non-fault claims themselves they could pass it to the 3rd party's insurer to handle.

Who are you insured with?
If just one insurer does it then all have to otherwise the one insurer that does it has reduced their overall cost and potentially able to undercut the others premiums.

If all insurers club together to eradicate Credit Hire then it will be viewed as a cartel and in breach of Competition Law. Have a look at the fines that can be levied for that.


Edited by LoonR1 on Saturday 21st February 23:25