Insurance Claim Advice Please?
Discussion
My MX5 was parked on the public highway and a neighbour has just reversed into it. Their towbar has mad a nice mess of the rear wing, bumper and light. They've admitted doing it and will be dropping insurance details in shortly .
I've already reported it to my insurers ( a well known nautical brand), who've given me the details of their no-fault claims team.
Suggestions/experience/advice please. Should I go through the no-fault team, approach the other insurer directly, or use Mazda's own Accident Management service (http://www.mazda.co.uk/buying-owning/owning/accident-management/ ) ?
I've already reported it to my insurers ( a well known nautical brand), who've given me the details of their no-fault claims team.
Suggestions/experience/advice please. Should I go through the no-fault team, approach the other insurer directly, or use Mazda's own Accident Management service (http://www.mazda.co.uk/buying-owning/owning/accident-management/ ) ?
PurpleMoonlight said:
rscott said:
I've already reported it to my insurers ( a well known nautical brand), who've given me the details of their no-fault claims team.
That'll likely be an AMC.Just checked the Mazda option and that seems reasonable - they'll ensure the work is done by a Mazda approved repairer, use Mazda genuine parts, etc.
The other insurer will be anxious to sort you out (so to speak...) because that way they maintain control of the cost
.
They'll also be anxious to "see you right" and to keep you happy? You could ask them to use the Mazda repairer and Mazda parts.
Once Mazda or your own insurers' AMC are involved then the potential costs rise significantly
.
. They'll also be anxious to "see you right" and to keep you happy? You could ask them to use the Mazda repairer and Mazda parts.
Once Mazda or your own insurers' AMC are involved then the potential costs rise significantly
.Not as yet - only got the details from the 3rd party today.
Probably going to take the easy option and let Mazda's AMC deal with it - at least that ensures the cars bodywork and mechanical warranty are unaffected.
Main task at the moment is to persuade Albany Assist/Admiral Law to stop calling/writing to me!
Given that Admiral Law can't even get my address right (correct on policy) that doesn't inspire confidence in their service.
I'm not surprised about the number of dubious PI claims either, despite me telling Admiral that the vehicle was unoccupied, every letter/email mentions that they will be glad to help if medical issues occur.
Surely their systems should flag up it's a no injury claim and stop mentioning injury in all correspondence?
Probably going to take the easy option and let Mazda's AMC deal with it - at least that ensures the cars bodywork and mechanical warranty are unaffected.
Main task at the moment is to persuade Albany Assist/Admiral Law to stop calling/writing to me!
Given that Admiral Law can't even get my address right (correct on policy) that doesn't inspire confidence in their service.
I'm not surprised about the number of dubious PI claims either, despite me telling Admiral that the vehicle was unoccupied, every letter/email mentions that they will be glad to help if medical issues occur.
Surely their systems should flag up it's a no injury claim and stop mentioning injury in all correspondence?
Forums | Speed, Plod & the Law | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff


