PF drops case day before trial, can I claim expenses?
PF drops case day before trial, can I claim expenses?
Author
Discussion

daveinaravecave

Original Poster:

1,149 posts

165 months

Friday 21st August 2015
quotequote all
Hello everyone,

Hope you can help me!

I was charged last year with careless driving and my trial was due to go ahead today. I've since relocated and travelled back yesterday to make sure I had plenty of time to relax before going to court today. However, around 3.30 pm the Procurator Fiscal office called a relative to advise that the case has been dropped. Of course, I'm very happy with this as my friend and I thought we were having to give evidence to prove my innocence which I've maintained from the start!

What would I be entitled to receive back in expenses and how would I go about it? Should I go in to the Fiscal's office on Monday? From looking online, I can't find anything that's applicable to my circumstances. I've had to take two days off work at an inconvenient time and spend cash on fuel and accommodation to be here. Luckily I have friends and family here so it's not a completely wasted journey. I'm quite annoyed that it even got this far to be honest and I'm also out of pocket for legal defence costs. I'll be hearing from the law firm next week to find out what I'm due back from them.

Thank you in advance for any advice or info!

Pontoneer

3,643 posts

216 months

Friday 21st August 2015
quotequote all
I don't know the legal position , but it strikes me that if you had travelled a significant distance , and booked accommodation to attend court , all before receiving notice of the cancellation ( and too late to obtain a refund for accommodation ) then it is not unreasonable that your expenses should be refunded just as though the case had gone ahead .

Red Devil

13,527 posts

238 months

Saturday 22nd August 2015
quotequote all
The question here is why was a witness (the OP's relative) informed and not him?
In E&W a defendant's costs order is covered by S.16 of the Prosecution of Offences Act 1985.
I don't know what the equivalent legislation is in Scotland.

s3fella

10,524 posts

217 months

Saturday 22nd August 2015
quotequote all
Not so sure, but if they have no informed you directly, then I think you can claim. Their argument will be you did not need to go two days before, only on the day, but if they didn't tell you, only a relative, then you can claim you'd travelled anyway as did not know.

I went to Scottish court as a witness in an assault. I am 400 miles away, travelled up on the day, took a day off etc. case was dropped in the waiting area as the defendant changed his plea, a common tactic to see if witnesses actually show up!
I was able to claim travel expenses and abou 30quid for my day off! The expenses were three fifths of fk all tbh.

Waste of time and menu cos some tt couldn't hold his beer!

battered

4,088 posts

177 months

Saturday 22nd August 2015
quotequote all
Think yourself lucky and shut up. You say yourself you haven't really got any expenses so don't take the mick.

Jasandjules

72,634 posts

259 months

Saturday 22nd August 2015
quotequote all
battered said:
Think yourself lucky and shut up. You say yourself you haven't really got any expenses so don't take the mick.
Why?

Pontoneer

3,643 posts

216 months

Saturday 22nd August 2015
quotequote all
s3fella said:
Not so sure, but if they have no informed you directly, then I think you can claim. Their argument will be you did not need to go two days before, only on the day, but if they didn't tell you, only a relative, then you can claim you'd travelled anyway as did not know.

I went to Scottish court as a witness in an assault. I am 400 miles away, travelled up on the day, took a day off etc. case was dropped in the waiting area as the defendant changed his plea, a common tactic to see if witnesses actually show up!
I was able to claim travel expenses and abou 30quid for my day off! The expenses were three fifths of fk all tbh.

Waste of time and menu cos some tt couldn't hold his beer!
He didn't travel up two days before , only the day before so that he could stay overnight and be rested before attending court in the morning ; I wouldn't want to travel overnight and then straight into court .

I've been cited as a witness many times in connection with work and normally you are expected to turn up first thing in the morning then wait to be called , so from a considerable distance travelling on the day wouldn't be practicable .

bobtail4x4

4,436 posts

139 months

Saturday 22nd August 2015
quotequote all
but he isnt a witness, he was being charged,

keep quiet and be gratefull.

matchmaker

9,068 posts

230 months

Saturday 22nd August 2015
quotequote all
You cannot claim expenses. Simple.

daveinaravecave

Original Poster:

1,149 posts

165 months

Saturday 22nd August 2015
quotequote all
Wow. I've not used this forum in a while although I do frequent the site for motoring news, yet I can see from some of the replies that there's a still a few aholes on here.

Thanks for the helpful replies! I'll pop in to their office on Monday and find out where I stand. It's not a stroke of luck, it should never have got to court in the first place.

matchmaker

9,068 posts

230 months

Saturday 22nd August 2015
quotequote all
daveinaravecave said:
Wow. I've not used this forum in a while although I do frequent the site for motoring news, yet I can see from some of the replies that there's a still a few aholes on here.

Thanks for the helpful replies! I'll pop in to their office on Monday and find out where I stand. It's not a stroke of luck, it should never have got to court in the first place.
As I stated in the previous post you cannot claim expenses! Don't waste your time - take this from someone who worked in the Scottish Court Service for 20 years.

daveinaravecave

Original Poster:

1,149 posts

165 months

Saturday 22nd August 2015
quotequote all
matchmaker said:
As I stated in the previous post you cannot claim expenses! Don't waste your time - take this from someone who worked in the Scottish Court Service for 20 years.
Thanks for clarifying who you are matchmaker. It's rather annoying that I'm a few hundred quid down though. I guess it's alright for the police to waste our time at the roadside and take them through the courts for feck all! I also assume that there's no Scottish equivalent to s16 of the Prosecution of Offences Act 1985?

One more question.... I've yet to find out the reason it was dropped. What's the best way to go about this? Thankfully I'm not familiar with the courts and their processes.

matchmaker

9,068 posts

230 months

Saturday 22nd August 2015
quotequote all
daveinaravecave said:
matchmaker said:
As I stated in the previous post you cannot claim expenses! Don't waste your time - take this from someone who worked in the Scottish Court Service for 20 years.
Thanks for clarifying who you are matchmaker. It's rather annoying that I'm a few hundred quid down though. I guess it's alright for the police to waste our time at the roadside and take them through the courts for feck all! I also assume that there's no Scottish equivalent to s16 of the Prosecution of Offences Act 1985?

One more question.... I've yet to find out the reason it was dropped. What's the best way to go about this? Thankfully I'm not familiar with the courts and their processes.
I'm not familiar with the act you quoted, I'm afraid. Expenses are very rarely awarded in a Scottish criminal court - either way. The only time I have seen them is when a local authority (rather than the PF) was prosecuting a parent for not sending their child to school and the authority was awarded a small amount of expenses. But very rare.

You (or your solicitor) could ask the Fiscal's office why it was dropped, but they are under no obligation to tell you!

TheEnd

15,370 posts

218 months

Saturday 22nd August 2015
quotequote all
Write to them and demand your case is heard.

Ken Figenus

6,011 posts

147 months

Saturday 22nd August 2015
quotequote all
Everyone else involved in the procedures were getting paid - why not repay just costs to the wrongly accused victim? Seems fair?

anonymous-user

84 months

Saturday 22nd August 2015
quotequote all
Ken Figenus said:
Everyone else involved in the procedures were getting paid - why not repay just costs to the wrongly accused victim? Seems fair?
Yes, that would seem fair but little about the UK's legal 'system' is fair. I've been almost exactly where the OP is and also got put to an awful lot of trouble, due to no fault of my own, with no compensation.

It seems defendants and witnesses have to organise themselves to please the Courts but the Courts can be as disorganised as they wish, and often are.


TheTechnician

37 posts

142 months

Sunday 23rd August 2015
quotequote all
Never good to be out of pocket. I expect you would have happily taken this outcome if offered this time last week.

herewego

8,814 posts

243 months

Sunday 23rd August 2015
quotequote all
My guess is that the prosecution witness was unavailable and that the prosecution did not know this until the day before the case. Maybe they could have delayed the case but deemed cancellation to be the fairer option at that point. Perhaps a good procedure is to call the court the day before the case to confirm it is going ahead.
If the case had gone ahead resulting in not guilty then the OP would be in the same position as now. If found guilty then much worse.

Drawweight

3,612 posts

146 months

Sunday 23rd August 2015
quotequote all

The case will have been called in the area that the offence was committed.

It's hardly the fault of the court that you moved.

Would you still expect expenses if you had emigrated to Australia?

Ken Figenus

6,011 posts

147 months

Sunday 23rd August 2015
quotequote all
No offence was committed...