Mobile phone penalties getting stronger
Discussion
And yet we see more and more 'Internet enabled' vehicles being produced with potentially distracting large screen displays...
Digi-yoof is addicted to Farsebook and Tw@tter, so an increase in fines for the use of mobile phones at the wheel is going to have little effect.
No doubt there'll also be the usual nonsense calls for hands-free phone use also to be banned. How could that ever be enforced? DWCA already covers inappropriate use, in my opinion.
Digi-yoof is addicted to Farsebook and Tw@tter, so an increase in fines for the use of mobile phones at the wheel is going to have little effect.
No doubt there'll also be the usual nonsense calls for hands-free phone use also to be banned. How could that ever be enforced? DWCA already covers inappropriate use, in my opinion.
supertouring said:
Lack of policing and increases in traffic means lower driving standards.
As above, no one cares about the fines as very unlikey to be caught.
The first choice of enforcement will still be to offer education on a Driver Awareness Course. I wonder if the Fine is raised to £150 whether the cost of attendance on the course will rise also?As above, no one cares about the fines as very unlikey to be caught.
Driver101 said:
It's not really a significant difference. People will still not care.
I think that's probably right although they will care if they get caught. It's a chance they take - quick look round to see no-one's looking (maybe) and then do it. I think we probably have a similar attitude to speed limits (within reason).Here's an idea.... Let legislation catch up with technology.
How many phones are now way more than phones. How many cars integrate partially with Bluetooth Streaming etc.
Put the technology in place that we don't need to touch our phones to choose music, make calls etc. and make it work instead of the buggers muddle that we have now.
That genies is out of the bottle, so let's get with it.
How many phones are now way more than phones. How many cars integrate partially with Bluetooth Streaming etc.
Put the technology in place that we don't need to touch our phones to choose music, make calls etc. and make it work instead of the buggers muddle that we have now.
That genies is out of the bottle, so let's get with it.
Amused2death said:
Here's an idea.
1st time caught = immediate 1 month ban (i.e. there and then, at the roadside)
2nd time caught = 1 year ban.
N.B. Usual exemption if done due to an emergency situation.
If you aren't allowed to drive then you can use your mobile to your heart's content.
Which is great, until the rare situation that occurs where someone sat in a queue just picks up their phone to move it or similar and ends up with a ban because of the way the current law works around the word 'using'1st time caught = immediate 1 month ban (i.e. there and then, at the roadside)
2nd time caught = 1 year ban.
N.B. Usual exemption if done due to an emergency situation.
If you aren't allowed to drive then you can use your mobile to your heart's content.
For actual driving I agree the penalty should be severe.
However, for me, there needs to be two tiers depending on if the car is moving or stationary, with stationary covering traffic lights or queueing. There just isn't the same level of risk. But a punishment should be handed out either way.
Amused2death said:
Here's an idea.
1st time caught = immediate 1 month ban (i.e. there and then, at the roadside)
2nd time caught = 1 year ban.
N.B. Usual exemption if done due to an emergency situation.
If you aren't allowed to drive then you can use your mobile to your heart's content.
"Pull over, my name is Dredd, you're banned"1st time caught = immediate 1 month ban (i.e. there and then, at the roadside)
2nd time caught = 1 year ban.
N.B. Usual exemption if done due to an emergency situation.
If you aren't allowed to drive then you can use your mobile to your heart's content.
Because we've all heard nothing but great stories on here about how people were stationary in a traffic jam, or didn't even have their mobile in the car and were still done with no redress.
Jonleeper said:
Amused2death said:
Here's an idea.
1st time caught = immediate 1 month ban (i.e. there and then, at the roadside)
2nd time caught = 1 year ban.
N.B. Usual exemption if done due to an emergency situation.
If you aren't allowed to drive then you can use your mobile to your heart's content.
"Pull over, my name is Dredd, you're banned"1st time caught = immediate 1 month ban (i.e. there and then, at the roadside)
2nd time caught = 1 year ban.
N.B. Usual exemption if done due to an emergency situation.
If you aren't allowed to drive then you can use your mobile to your heart's content.
Because we've all heard nothing but great stories on here about how people were stationary in a traffic jam, or didn't even have their mobile in the car and were still done with no redress.
My idea may not be perfect, but if those were the penalties then usage would drop, or those that do it and get caught would be removed from the road. In either case it would be no bad thing.
Amused2death said:
Here's an idea.
1st time caught = immediate 1 month ban (i.e. there and then, at the roadside)
2nd time caught = 1 year ban.
N.B. Usual exemption if done due to an emergency situation.
If you aren't allowed to drive then you can use your mobile to your heart's content.
This is problem with making it illegal. Driving while on the phone isn't difficult but it's pretty obvious you're doing it, texting is far less obvious but a million times more distracting. 1st time caught = immediate 1 month ban (i.e. there and then, at the roadside)
2nd time caught = 1 year ban.
N.B. Usual exemption if done due to an emergency situation.
If you aren't allowed to drive then you can use your mobile to your heart's content.
Forums | Speed, Plod & the Law | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff



