Speeding ticket - Weird scenario
Speeding ticket - Weird scenario
Author
Discussion

clio007

Original Poster:

622 posts

255 months

Monday 4th January 2016
quotequote all
Hi

I received a NIP for speeding last month. I have a few queries on what I should do next.
The NIP is in my name, whereas the car is registered in my sisters name. I do not drive the vehicle, nor am I insured to drive the vehicle.
The vehicle was purchased by my sister on the 7th November - date of offence is the 18th November

I received the NIP letter on the 16th December exactly 28 days from the date of offence

How should I approach this? By law, do I have to give the details of the driver? I'm not the registered keeper and never have been.

Alex

9,978 posts

314 months

Monday 4th January 2016
quotequote all
If you are not the registered keeper, then the only possibility I can think of is that your sister received an NIP and returned it naming you as the driver. Is that likely?

mcflurry

9,191 posts

283 months

Monday 4th January 2016
quotequote all
Did the seller put your details on the V5 slip instead of your sister?
Or maybe she nominated you as the driver when the NIP turned up?

SS2.

14,712 posts

268 months

Monday 4th January 2016
quotequote all
Have you asked your sister whether she nominated you as the driver ?

clio007

Original Poster:

622 posts

255 months

Monday 4th January 2016
quotequote all
My sister did not nominate me. I *think* it was the seller of the car. He had my full name from my email address as we exchanged correspondences.

I assume it took them that long to send the NIP because they contacted the previous owner.
Really strange as she had a seperate NIP just 2 weeks earlier and they had access to her details from DVLA (I guess) without contacting the previous owner. Im assuming this as it came within the 14 day timeframe


Edit - I filled in all the paperwork and definately put my sisters details on the V5. The log book is here in her name.

Retroman

975 posts

163 months

Monday 4th January 2016
quotequote all
Regardless if you are the registered keeper or not, you have to respond to the NIP still within the allocated time. If you weren't driving on the date & time and you don't know who was, then you send back the NIP with your sisters details nominating her.


longblackcoat

5,047 posts

213 months

Monday 4th January 2016
quotequote all
Unless you actually know who the driver was at the time of the offence, the correct action is to state that you were not driving (and have never driven) the car in question, and that you don't know who was.

If you don't own it, don't live at the address it's registered to, and aren't insured on it, there's a very good chance it'll then bounce back to your sister for further information.

SS2.

14,712 posts

268 months

Monday 4th January 2016
quotequote all
clio007 said:
By law, do I have to give the details of the driver? I'm not the registered keeper and never have been.
As a person other than keeper, you are obliged to provide any information which is in your power to give and which may lead to identification of the driver.

Write back to the SCP, tell them what you do know and include your sister's details. Ensure your response is delivered within 28 days from when you received the notice.

In due course, your sister will receive a similar requirement to provide driver details.


Edited by SS2. on Monday 4th January 12:41

Alex

9,978 posts

314 months

Monday 4th January 2016
quotequote all
Have you asked your sister if she was actually driving at the time of the alleged offence?

Monkeylegend

29,462 posts

261 months

Monday 4th January 2016
quotequote all
Looks like sis is in for 6 points then.

SS2.

14,712 posts

268 months

Monday 4th January 2016
quotequote all
Monkeylegend said:
Looks like sis is in for 6 points then.
Why do you think that ?

Red Devil

13,527 posts

238 months

Monday 4th January 2016
quotequote all
clio007 said:
I received a NIP for speeding last month.
You have 28 days from the date of service to respond to a S.172 notice - S.172(7)(a). You really should have begun to to deal with this much sooner - i.e. before the Christmas/New Year break as you're now rapidly running out of time.

clio007 said:
The NIP is in my name, whereas the car is registered in my sisters name. I do not drive the vehicle, nor am I insured to drive the vehicle.
You now have just 9 days left to sort it. I would start by telephoning the issuing office (confirm in writing) to:

a) inform them you are not the RK
b) ask them how they got your details as
c) you have never been the driver of the vehicle (the insurance angle is not relevant to a charge of speeding)

See what response, if any, you get. If you get none/they won't NFA it in time (very likely given the looming cut off date) you have to act or else risk 6 points and a fine.

The driver is very likely to have been your sister but as you have no proof it is arguable that the relevant details are not within your power to provide - Section 172(2)(b). However Section 172(4) requires you to perform due diligence so you must ask your sister whether she was the driver: and if not whether she knows who was. Then take it from there and make sure you return the S.172 before the deadline date.





Monkeylegend

29,462 posts

261 months

Monday 4th January 2016
quotequote all
SS2. said:
Monkeylegend said:
Looks like sis is in for 6 points then.
Why do you think that ?
Well if she was driving and not the OP, and she has recently received another NIP, potentially she is on for 6 points, or a speed awareness and 3 points.

A lot of if's and but's, but....................

Torquey

1,961 posts

258 months

Monday 4th January 2016
quotequote all
Retroman said:
then you send back the NIP with your sisters details nominating her.
Is that correct? Shouldn't he just confirm he was not driving it.
What if his sister was not driving it either.

SS2.

14,712 posts

268 months

Monday 4th January 2016
quotequote all
Red Devil said:
However Section 172(4) requires you to perform due diligence so you must ask your sister whether she was the driver: and if not whether she knows who was.
I disagree.

s.172(4) (ie reasonable diligence) only applies to the person keeping the vehicle - the OP is a person other than keeper.

As such, he doesn't need to go on a fact finding mission, and he doesn't need to ask his sister anything - he simply needs to provide any information that is currently in his power to give and which may lead to identification of the driver.

SS2.

14,712 posts

268 months

Monday 4th January 2016
quotequote all
Torquey said:
Retroman said:
then you send back the NIP with your sisters details nominating her.
Is that correct? Shouldn't he just confirm he was not driving it.
What if his sister was not driving it either.
He needs to tell them what he does know. In addition to knowing he wasn't driving, he knows that his sister was the keeper of the vehicle at the time of the alleged offence.

This is what he should tell them, as well as providing her contact details.

clio007

Original Poster:

622 posts

255 months

Monday 4th January 2016
quotequote all
Thanks for the reponses guys.

My sister said she doesn’t remember taking that particular route to work, but it probably was her as the time matches the time she usually goes to work.

I just thought the NIP may not be enforceable as they sent it in my name. I did some googling and as I am not the registered keeper or owner - I could not be charged as the car has nothing to do with me.

I will give them a call later and confirm the situation. I have worked out why it’s in my name. I signed the receipt paperbag


SS2.

14,712 posts

268 months

Monday 4th January 2016
quotequote all
clio007 said:
I just thought the NIP may not be enforceable as they sent it in my name. I did some googling and as I am not the registered keeper or owner - I could not be charged as the car has nothing to do with me.
That's completely wrong, I'm afraid.

If you fail to respond, you could well end up with a trip to court, 6 points and associated fines & court costs.

Red Devil

13,527 posts

238 months

Monday 4th January 2016
quotequote all
SS2. said:
Red Devil said:
However Section 172(4) requires you to perform due diligence so you must ask your sister whether she was the driver: and if not whether she knows who was.
I disagree.

s.172(4) (ie reasonable diligence) only applies to the person keeping the vehicle - the OP is a person other than keeper.

As such, he doesn't need to go on a fact finding mission, and he doesn't need to ask his sister anything - he simply needs to provide any information that is currently in his power to give and which may lead to identification of the driver.
Oops: my mistake. getmecoat You're right: S172(4) only applies to S.172(2)(a) not S.172(2)(b).boxedin

OP, you don't seem to have fully understood that hoping a S.172 notice will just go away is folly. SS2 is the man: please heed his advice.

konark

1,241 posts

149 months

Tuesday 5th January 2016
quotequote all
So much for the right to silence!