Moving PCN evidence?
Author
Discussion

esinem

Original Poster:

37 posts

241 months

Monday 25th January 2016
quotequote all
To cut a long story short, I have a PCN for a no left turn on a motorbike. I have responded that they have not provided evidence that confirms that the alleged offence occurred.

All Haringey's correspondence says I can view "moving CCTV evidence" on-line but their links only show 2 still photos of my/a bike making the turn with no reg in shot and a separate close-up showing my reg plate with no visible references to indicate where the bike was, albeit one can see that in all shots it was a black bike and the rider/s had camo cargo pants ;-) I am also offered the opportunity of visiting to view the video, although oddly my PCN details wee not included in teh video evidence section of their site (there are two PCN prefixes, one for stills and one for CCTV). Of course, had it been a car, there would have been front plates and thus undeniable evidence that the offence occurred.

Have they got me bang to rights, guv, or do you think it's worth going to tribunal?





Edited by esinem on Monday 25th January 16:10

PurpleMoonlight

22,362 posts

187 months

Monday 25th January 2016
quotequote all
Was it you, did you do it?

esinem

Original Poster:

37 posts

241 months

Monday 25th January 2016
quotequote all
PurpleMoonlight said:
Was it you, did you do it?
That has never had anything to do with paying PCN's! Shame on you, wash you mouth out with soap :-D

PurpleMoonlight

22,362 posts

187 months

Monday 25th January 2016
quotequote all
esinem said:
That has never had anything to do with paying PCN's! Shame on you, wash you mouth out with soap :-D
It's the new SP&L where the guilty get told to man up, stop wasting other peoples time and money, and accept the consequences of your actions.

esinem

Original Poster:

37 posts

241 months

Monday 25th January 2016
quotequote all
You should check out some of the scams run by councils to raise money via PCN's. I have and gained a healthy scepticism. Not saying this is one of them however.

speedking31

3,951 posts

166 months

Monday 25th January 2016
quotequote all
I doubt you have any chance of overturning the penalty.

I don't know the reason for the no left turn, but there doesn't seem to be any inconvenience to others and it might be a genuine mistake. It is annoying that CCTV is used in these circumstances where a human might let it go as no-one was troubled, but the automatic process is unstoppable. You have my sympathy.

jodypress

2,111 posts

304 months

Monday 25th January 2016
quotequote all
esinem said:
To cut a long story short, I have a PCN for a no left turn on a motorbike. I have responded that they have not provided evidence that confirms that the alleged offence occurred.

All Haringey's correspondence says I can view "moving CCTV evidence" on-line but their links only show 2 still photos of my/a bike making the turn with no reg in shot and a separate close-up showing my reg plate with no visible references to indicate where the bike was, albeit one can see that in all shots it was a black bike and the rider/s had camo cargo pants ;-) I am also offered the opportunity of visiting to view the video, although oddly my PCN details wee not included in teh video evidence section of their site (there are two PCN prefixes, one for stills and one for CCTV). Of course, had it been a car, there would have been front plates and thus undeniable evidence that the offence occurred.

Have they got me bang to rights, guv, or do you think it's worth going to tribunal?





Edited by esinem on Monday 25th January 16:10
I too received one from Hackney by CCTV and I could view the video link.

Anyhow. That's at Bounds Green station, big no left turn signs everywhere. Sorry Guv but you're bang to rights...good luck with the PCN Challenge.


anonymous-user

84 months

Monday 25th January 2016
quotequote all
What's the argument? That the similar bike and rider wearing same gear, photographed 12s later might be a different one?

What are the chances of that? wink


esinem

Original Poster:

37 posts

241 months

Monday 25th January 2016
quotequote all
REALIST123 said:
What's the argument? That the similar bike and rider wearing same gear, photographed 12s later might be a different one?

What are the chances of that? wink
They are ever so common, guv ;-)

F-knows how I'd have missed it!

the_lone_wolf

2,622 posts

216 months

Monday 25th January 2016
quotequote all
Seriously OP??? I mean, really???

It's blindingly obvious that the images you've been sent are from a video...

How were you planning on defending the inevitable court case when they show up with said video?...

biggrin

Pay up, move on...


Poor obs by the way... wink Must have missed the "AHEAD ONLY" a few metres back on the road surface... wink

esinem

Original Poster:

37 posts

241 months

Tuesday 26th January 2016
quotequote all
Meh! I decided it was safest to fold for £65 than ask to see them for £130 :-) It's just against my nature to pay up without a fight as I usually win ;-)

Gotta say, I have no idea how I missed the profusion of signs. Must have been on auto-pilot as when I lived around that way many years back you could turn left there. As you can see the curved corner rather than a sharp one is a legacy.