Has my mate got lucky??
Has my mate got lucky??
Author
Discussion

oceanview

Original Poster:

1,631 posts

161 months

Monday 13th February 2017
quotequote all
A friend I've just been away with was telling me how he got stopped late one evening a week before Christmas, just outside town on a dual- carriageway which I know as he said has a rather daft 30mph limit. the rozzers were tucked away at the end of this stretch and "got" him at 57mph

After passing a breath test ( late, just before xmas) they started to take details and said that it would probably go to court as it was that much over the limit. My mate then said about the lack of speed signs along the road (he checked next day and there is none he could see) and also asked what the fine might be. The copper said it depends on your salary at which point my mate said he was self-employed. Policeman then says tell them you earn less than you do and get a smaller fine.
At this point, my mate finishes the conversation by adding, thanks for that, I've recorded that on my phone so I am sure the court will be interested in what you say to avoid a larger fine.

The officer gives him a look as if he doesn't know if he's joking or not and mate goes on his way.

He still hasn't received anything in the post yet so has this one "disappeared" or can you get NIP long after the date you were stopped- is there a cut-off time?



DuraAce

4,272 posts

190 months

Monday 13th February 2017
quotequote all
6 months time limit I believe. Certainly was for me, well it was five months and two weeks before the postman delivered the 'good news'.

KevinCamaroSS

13,843 posts

310 months

Monday 13th February 2017
quotequote all
If there are no signs of a speed limit change why would it be 30mph? He must have passed a speed limit change at some point. After that, provided there are street lights, no repeaters are needed, therefore if no repeaters assume 30. As for the rest, the police have 6 months to lay the evidence before the court to obtain a summons. No NIP needed, he has already had his NIP verbally.

Flooble

5,756 posts

130 months

Monday 13th February 2017
quotequote all
Um, is it not the case that an NIP is usually only when you were caught by A camera and thus you won't receive one if you are actually stopped? I thought an NIP was in general in lieu of actually interacting with a human police officer?

So it's just a six month wait for the summons?

Or have I got the wrong end of the stick?

TooMany2cvs

29,008 posts

156 months

Monday 13th February 2017
quotequote all
oceanview said:
A friend I've just been away with was telling me how he got stopped ... 30mph limit

My mate then said about the lack of speed signs along the road (he checked next day and there is none he could see)
There were streetlights, weren't there?

david mcc

210 posts

130 months

Monday 13th February 2017
quotequote all
Your mate sounds like a bit of an arse to be fair. Why try to noise up the cops after they have been decent enough to give him some friendly advice and limit his punishment.

Just imo

anonymous-user

84 months

Monday 13th February 2017
quotequote all
Your mate is a dhead and I hope he gets his summons, they're good coppers and bad coppers and it sounds like your mate got a good one that tried to help him out even though he was breaking the law and he rubbed there nose in it.

Tell your mate to enjoy the fine.

oceanview

Original Poster:

1,631 posts

161 months

Monday 13th February 2017
quotequote all
Yes I know, the copper was probably just trying to ease the pain but my mate was -I don't know- pissed off at the stop, cross with something else, seen a way out, who knows, nobody's perfect and he is a good chap actually.

Anyway, there are street lights on this stretch but not urban area, its just off the motorway and people have been "done" there before but he's from out of the area so wouldn't have known its a hotspot. I will have to check signage myself!

Ok, so it might still be a letter through the post box then!

TooMany2cvs

29,008 posts

156 months

Monday 13th February 2017
quotequote all
oceanview said:
Anyway, there are street lights on this stretch but not urban area
And what does the combo of streetlights and no repeaters tell us about the limit...?

paintman

7,860 posts

220 months

Monday 13th February 2017
quotequote all
Flooble said:
Um, is it not the case that an NIP is usually only when you were caught by A camera and thus you won't receive one if you are actually stopped? I thought an NIP was in general in lieu of actually interacting with a human police officer?
NIP would have been given verbally at the time & a follow-up in writing is not required. Perhaps he ought to check his phone.

paul789

4,261 posts

134 months

Monday 13th February 2017
quotequote all
oceanview said:
A friend I've just been away with was telling me how he got stopped late one evening a week before Christmas, just outside town on a dual- carriageway which I know as he said has a rather daft 30mph limit. the rozzers were tucked away at the end of this stretch and "got" him at 57mph

After passing a breath test ( late, just before xmas) they started to take details and said that it would probably go to court as it was that much over the limit. My mate then said about the lack of speed signs along the road (he checked next day and there is none he could see) and also asked what the fine might be. The copper said it depends on your salary at which point my mate said he was self-employed. Policeman then says tell them you earn less than you do and get a smaller fine.
At this point, my mate finishes the conversation by adding, thanks for that, I've recorded that on my phone so I am sure the court will be interested in what you say to avoid a larger fine.

The officer gives him a look as if he doesn't know if he's joking or not and mate goes on his way.

He still hasn't received anything in the post yet so has this one "disappeared" or can you get NIP long after the date you were stopped- is there a cut-off time?
May be off the mark here, but sounds like a half-term classic.

Dagnir

2,116 posts

193 months

Tuesday 14th February 2017
quotequote all
Learn2MergeInTurn said:
Your mate is a dhead and I hope he gets his summons, they're good coppers and bad coppers and it sounds like your mate got a good one that tried to help him out even though he was breaking the law and he rubbed there nose in it.

Tell your mate to enjoy the fine.
Totally agree...what a bellend. Copper tries to do help him out and he's a total pr!ck about it.


superlightr

12,920 posts

293 months

Tuesday 14th February 2017
quotequote all
Why would the policeman recommend that the speeder to lie to the court?

Is the policeman interfering with justice and what would perhaps have been a larger fine? a bit like an accountant saying to his client that he should only declare half of your earnings to get you a lesser fine?

If the speeder was being done for excess speed telling him to lie to the courts over anything to get a lesser fine must be an abuse of position or perverting the course of justice?

I'm taking no sides in this and post the above as its an arguable issue - interesting to discuss. smile


agtlaw

7,409 posts

236 months

Tuesday 14th February 2017
quotequote all
oceanview said:
A friend I've just been away with was telling me how he got stopped late one evening a week before Christmas, just outside town on a dual- carriageway which I know as he said has a rather daft 30mph limit. the rozzers were tucked away at the end of this stretch and "got" him at 57mph

After passing a breath test ( late, just before xmas) they started to take details and said that it would probably go to court as it was that much over the limit. My mate then said about the lack of speed signs along the road (he checked next day and there is none he could see) and also asked what the fine might be. The copper said it depends on your salary at which point my mate said he was self-employed. Policeman then says tell them you earn less than you do and get a smaller fine.
At this point, my mate finishes the conversation by adding, thanks for that, I've recorded that on my phone so I am sure the court will be interested in what you say to avoid a larger fine.

The officer gives him a look as if he doesn't know if he's joking or not and mate goes on his way.

He still hasn't received anything in the post yet so has this one "disappeared" or can you get NIP long after the date you were stopped- is there a cut-off time?
The police have 6 months to institute proceedings. If you get the Metropolitan Police and they issue proceedings using a Written Charge and Single Justice Procedure Notice then you may find that they don't know what they are doing with the "new" procedure and the case is later dropped when the CPS gets their hands on it following a not guilty plea. Your client then walks away from a speeding offence notwithstanding that he was accused of driving at 113 mph.

HantsRat

2,409 posts

138 months

Tuesday 14th February 2017
quotequote all
He would have been verbal NIP'd at the time of the offence. The Police have 6 months to start proceedings so still a little while to wait yet.

No NIP needs to be sent via post if given verbally at the roadside. In Hants if the speed is too high to be dealt with by means of an FPN we don't even given anything to the driver at the roadside. Verbal NIP, report for offence then issue a SJPN for the offence (Within 6 months) The SJPN may not arrive within 6 months but if Police started proceedings in this time then all above board.

agtlaw

7,409 posts

236 months

Tuesday 14th February 2017
quotequote all
HantsRat said:
The SJPN may not arrive within 6 months but if Police started proceedings in this time then all above board.
Good luck with that one.

MikeGoodwin

3,907 posts

147 months

Tuesday 14th February 2017
quotequote all
What a bell tap. Hope your mate gets absolutely fudged for it after saying that. Tosser.

PAULJ5555

3,554 posts

206 months

Tuesday 14th February 2017
quotequote all
Why are you all defending this copper who has just advised a member of the public to lie to the courts?

Its not the copper showing a bit of common sense or showing leniency, he advised him to lie in court.



LocoCoco

1,433 posts

206 months

Tuesday 14th February 2017
quotequote all
In another thread on here, lots of posters were up in arms that somebody would lie about their earnings to reduce their fine.
Welcome to the real world all those people.

Vaud

59,682 posts

185 months

Tuesday 14th February 2017
quotequote all
agtlaw said:
The police have 6 months to institute proceedings. If you get the Metropolitan Police and they issue proceedings using a Written Charge and Single Justice Procedure Notice then you may find that they don't know what they are doing with the "new" procedure and the case is later dropped when the CPS gets their hands on it following a not guilty plea. Your client then walks away from a speeding offence notwithstanding that he was accused of driving at 113 mph.
You mentioned this in another thread, can you share more?