Hire car damaged, declared, but not charged for - what now?
Hire car damaged, declared, but not charged for - what now?
Author
Discussion

MrJingles705

Original Poster:

409 posts

173 months

Wednesday 5th April 2017
quotequote all
Here is an odd one.

Hired a car from Sixt for two days and turned down the glass excess waver (because I couldn't remember the last time I'd had to repair/replace a screen on any of my cars..... ). You can guess what happened next, picked up a stone chip dead centre in the drivers vision (25mm approx when you include the inevitable 'star crack') from a car flicking something up going the other way 10 mins before giving it back.

Duely decided that there was nothing to be done but declare it up front so told the agent; check in guy made me do an electronic signature on a pad declaring that as the only piece of damage. Was told that damage is refered to a dedicated team and I would be contacted within a week.

That was on Thurs 16th March.... I've not had a call or email since, and nothing has come off the card. When I contacted the branch they told me, again, that the damage team will be in touch and didn't seem to be concerned about the delay.

Should I be concerned here? Are they just slow? Could they have forgotten about it, or am I going to be stung 18 months from now when they remember?

I think tomorrow I might put in a call direct to the head office since local guys don't seem fussed...... curious to see if anyone else has had experiences like this. Not usually expecting to chase people to give them my money!

KungFuPanda

4,642 posts

200 months

Wednesday 5th April 2017
quotequote all
Just leave it be. Why would you cause them to give them your own money?

Chucklehead

2,855 posts

238 months

Wednesday 5th April 2017
quotequote all
Your main concern should be that they get it repaired while it's just a repair job.. If they keep renting the car it would eventually crack, and then you're on the hook for the entire screen.

Black_S3

2,834 posts

218 months

Wednesday 5th April 2017
quotequote all
Every Sixt I've dealt with have been pretty good with damage that 'just' happens. Leave it with them, I wouldn't be surprised if you didn't hear any more.

KevinCamaroSS

13,843 posts

310 months

Thursday 6th April 2017
quotequote all
Chucklehead said:
Your main concern should be that they get it repaired while it's just a repair job.. If they keep renting the car it would eventually crack, and then you're on the hook for the entire screen.
Rubbish, damage declared and proved at return of hire, no more liability exists.

Riley Blue

23,205 posts

256 months

Thursday 6th April 2017
quotequote all
MrJingles705 said:
Not usually expecting to chase people to give them my money!
If you insist on handing over some dosh I'll send you my account's paying in details.

Chucklehead

2,855 posts

238 months

Thursday 6th April 2017
quotequote all
KevinCamaroSS said:
Chucklehead said:
Your main concern should be that they get it repaired while it's just a repair job.. If they keep renting the car it would eventually crack, and then you're on the hook for the entire screen.
Rubbish, damage declared and proved at return of hire, no more liability exists.
what do you mean no more liability exists? the liability still exists for the repair of the windscreen. whether that means repair or replace is something the OP has no control over.. The longer it is driven without repair, the more likely it is to require replacement. What part of that do you disagree with?

spikyone

1,915 posts

130 months

Thursday 6th April 2017
quotequote all
Some insurers (AA and Co-op amongst others) don't charge an excess for windscreen repairs. You'd have to check Sixt's Ts & Cs in detail, but it may be that there was nothing to pay anyway. As with everyone else, I wouldn't waste any time chasing them for this, and probably wouldn't even have brought it up on returning the car.

KevinCamaroSS

13,843 posts

310 months

Thursday 6th April 2017
quotequote all
Chucklehead said:
KevinCamaroSS said:
Chucklehead said:
Your main concern should be that they get it repaired while it's just a repair job.. If they keep renting the car it would eventually crack, and then you're on the hook for the entire screen.
Rubbish, damage declared and proved at return of hire, no more liability exists.
what do you mean no more liability exists? the liability still exists for the repair of the windscreen. whether that means repair or replace is something the OP has no control over.. The longer it is driven without repair, the more likely it is to require replacement. What part of that do you disagree with?
The liability exists for the repair, not a complete replacement if the hire company does not fix it.

Chucklehead

2,855 posts

238 months

Thursday 6th April 2017
quotequote all
Whether you choose to accept it or not, if that windscreen is replaced it will be the OPs responsibility. All they have to say is that it wasn't within the limits for repair and it needed replaced. The fact that the chip cracked is still ultimately the OPs responsibility.

Chucklehead

2,855 posts

238 months

Thursday 6th April 2017
quotequote all
spikyone said:
Some insurers (AA and Co-op amongst others) don't charge an excess for windscreen repairs. You'd have to check Sixt's Ts & Cs in detail, but it may be that there was nothing to pay anyway. As with everyone else, I wouldn't waste any time chasing them for this, and probably wouldn't even have brought it up on returning the car.
Rental companies don't insure their fleets this way. However, most negotiate their windscreen replacements with national suppliers, so as part of that agreement might have free repairs included.

MrJingles705

Original Poster:

409 posts

173 months

Thursday 6th April 2017
quotequote all
My only concern about not taking positive actions to chase this down would be one of the following:
1) They leave it too long and it goes from repair to replace.... who is liable? I have a picture of it when I handed over, but not entirely sure if this is enough to cover me.
2) "Loss of use" - e.g. if they have had it sitting around not repaired and not hired, can they add that to the costs?

T&C for Sixt isn't clear on either of the above.... counter argument for both is the concept under contract law of the obligation to mitigate losses

mr rusty

221 posts

122 months

Thursday 6th April 2017
quotequote all
Personally, I wouldn't chase it. If/as/when something happens you have an opportunity to react depending on what happens, but I wouldn't be volunteering.

A few years ago I had a hire car in Italian lakes. We got hit by a mega hailstorm and although I was parked under a tree the car had several dints in the roof. I had "insurance4carhire" to cover claims, and was expecting to have to do this. Returned the car and never heard another word. Perhaps they were just glad I wasn't parked in the square. Cars there had screens smashed, wing mirrors knocked off and humungous dints. never seen hail like it. 90% of the stones were the size of golf balls with a few the size of tangerines. Scary!

Starfighter

5,350 posts

208 months

Thursday 6th April 2017
quotequote all
I think I may have had that car after you.

MrJingles705

Original Poster:

409 posts

173 months

Thursday 6th April 2017
quotequote all
Starfighter said:
I think I may have had that car after you.
?