Smart Car with Telescopic Camera
Smart Car with Telescopic Camera
Author
Discussion

Swole

Original Poster:

693 posts

151 months

Thursday 26th October 2017
quotequote all
First I've seen of it, so I've searched and answers aren't conclusive, to me at least.

So, driving on the A244 in Oxshott, Surrey, I rise over the brow of a hill and am greeted with a Smart Car on the other side, sign written with Camera signs. The boot is open and sitting on it is a chap with what looks like an SLR held to his face with a telescopic lens.

Speed checked, I was ok, and I wasn't fooling about with a phone or what not so I'm not nervous. Any idea what this guy is trying to sting people for?

sherbertdip

1,288 posts

149 months

Thursday 26th October 2017
quotequote all
He was waiting for a Pagani Zonda to come past very fast (sideways).

Edited by sherbertdip on Thursday 26th October 14:05

creampuff

6,511 posts

173 months

Thursday 26th October 2017
quotequote all
Local council. Looking to boost their revenue by detecting all manner of petty infractions while making your life difficult.

CAPP0

20,881 posts

233 months

Thursday 26th October 2017
quotequote all
creampuff said:
Local council. Looking to boost their revenue by detecting all manner of petty infractions while making your life difficult.
Yep. They're all over London. Saw one this morning. Put half a wheel in a bus lane, stop for a millisecond on a box junction, etc etc and bingo, you're on camera and fined.

It's probably a fantastic business model. Smart car for, what, £10k? Another grand for the camera, and minimal wages for the drivers, all paid for (and more) from the fine revenue.

Swole

Original Poster:

693 posts

151 months

Thursday 26th October 2017
quotequote all
This is interesting. So, where does the line stop?

Will they try to fine people for not driving with hands at 10 & 2? Who glanced away for a second from the road ahead (I.e looking at speedo, fuel, radio perhaps)? Who scratched their head, leg, balls?

vonhosen

40,597 posts

247 months

Thursday 26th October 2017
quotequote all
Swole said:
This is interesting. So, where does the line stop?

Will they try to fine people for not driving with hands at 10 & 2? Who glanced away for a second from the road ahead (I.e looking at speedo, fuel, radio perhaps)? Who scratched their head, leg, balls?
No, just for the offences that have been devolved to local councils to deal with
(Bus lanes, No Right Turn, No U turn, Pedestrian crossings, Box junctions etc etc).

Alucidnation

16,810 posts

200 months

Thursday 26th October 2017
quotequote all
Bournemouth council used to run these and drive by the one hour limit road parking bays to catch over stayers.

Didn’t last long.


Swole

Original Poster:

693 posts

151 months

Thursday 26th October 2017
quotequote all
Ok, so this car was signed as Police and had the blue/yellow reflectives in places.

They were sitting in this lay-by on the left in picture 1. Picture 2 shows the opposite side of the road, and picture 3 the road approaching the lay-by. In Picture 3 the road looks longer than it is in reality, to the brow of the hill. This lay-by has been designed to catch people out with no visibility of any police/camera vehicles; I bet it's a speed van cash cow.

There really was nothing around for people to get wrong. No red-route, not yellow boxes, bus lanes so I can only assume it was phones and seatbelts.







Edited by Swole on Thursday 26th October 20:32

gavgavgav

1,569 posts

259 months

Thursday 26th October 2017
quotequote all
That lay-by was put in for police camera cars about 2 years ago (at great cost I would imagine), who used to park on the grass. Instead there are the little concrete square things that have grass between them. Every now and again there is a normal looking camera van in there.

Never seen the smart car about, but there has been issues with really heavy traffic recently in the area causing quite an issue, could it be simply traffic monitoring? From there they could also be monitoring the entrance to the private school (which generates half the traffic!).

or it's the goole maps car on a break!

Dogwatch

6,383 posts

252 months

Thursday 26th October 2017
quotequote all
gavgavgav said:
That lay-by was put in for police camera cars about 2 years ago (at great cost I would imagine), who used to park on the grass. Instead there are the little concrete square things that have grass between them. Every now and again there is a normal looking camera van in there.

They put something similar in the central reservation of our local DC (30 limit). Actually only useable as two single carriageways due to parked cars.
It was used about twice and then it appears someone reckoned they could do better by hiding among the parked cars, helped by a slight left-hand curve for concealment.

Red Devil

13,520 posts

238 months

Friday 27th October 2017
quotequote all
gavgavgav said:
That lay-by was put in for police camera cars about 2 years ago (at great cost I would imagine), who used to park on the grass. Instead there are the little concrete square things that have grass between them. Every now and again there is a normal looking camera van in there.

Never seen the smart car about, but there has been issues with really heavy traffic recently in the area causing quite an issue, could it be simply traffic monitoring? From there they could also be monitoring the entrance to the private school (which generates half the traffic!).

or it's the goole maps car on a break!
Ah, I know where that is. Street View from the Google car is deceptive.
The hill going down towards the bend is quite a bit steeper than it looks.
It's dead easy to creep up to 35/36on the approach which will get you pinged.
Not when its congested though. It's snail's pace at those times.

Another spot they like to lurk is between here and the lights at Milbourne Lane/Claremont Drive.
https://goo.gl/maps/tyt5oJaodrK2


Mephistofleas

1,393 posts

220 months

Friday 27th October 2017
quotequote all
Phew that's a relief!

I can't explain why but for a fleeting moment of sheer panic-stricken terror I thought that priorities might be slipping somewhere. Then I saw this thread.

Sleep easy tonight folks. All is well.

lucido grigio

44,044 posts

193 months

Friday 27th October 2017
quotequote all
One of their uses for these in London is/was to capture people disobeying simple things such as no right turns at junctions.

catso

16,478 posts

297 months

Friday 27th October 2017
quotequote all
creampuff said:
Local council. Looking to boost their revenue by detecting all manner of petty infractions while making your life difficult.
You have to wonder at the mindset of the individuals that dream up all these petty offences and ever devious means of enforcing them, is a life so difficult to get?

creampuff

6,511 posts

173 months

Friday 27th October 2017
quotequote all
catso said:
You have to wonder at the mindset of the individuals that dream up all these petty offences and ever devious means of enforcing them, is a life so difficult to get?
I try to minimise my driving in this country now as it is just not pleasant any more. I now no longer go for recreational drives at all andvive cut back on driving to places I used to like to go. I either stay at home or do something else which involves less driving. Too much traffic and too many cameras. Even if you don't do anything wrong, you are always watching yourself because someone is watching you.

Saleen836

12,507 posts

239 months

Saturday 28th October 2017
quotequote all
Swole said:
This is interesting. So, where does the line stop?

Will they try to fine people for not driving with hands at 10 & 2? Who glanced away for a second from the road ahead (I.e looking at speedo, fuel, radio perhaps)? Who scratched their head, leg, balls?
If a ticket was issued for this you could argue that since the introduction of airbags a safer driver position would be 3 & 9 wink