prosecuting speeding offences 2years later. is that possible
Discussion
I done speeding offence. Done 110 miles in motorway from bristol to dover. should get cought by quite few cameras. Done that almost 2 years ago, never received ticket or court summon order since then. Wondering can police by law prosecute it later or there is time limit when police allowed to prosecute? In fact i was suspect and under surveleance. Another criminal case was opened against me. And this speeding offence could be linked to criminal case by police. They still have no evedence to arrest me and this never happens. Can police prosecute speeding offence 2 years later or even 3 or more?
Please no bulls
t, just reply if you know answer. Could be nice get answer from solicitor if we have online in this website. thank you
Please no bulls
t, just reply if you know answer. Could be nice get answer from solicitor if we have online in this website. thank youandriuzz said:
I done speeding offence. Done 110 miles in motorway from bristol to dover. should get cought by quite few cameras. Done that almost 2 years ago, never received ticket or court summon order since then. Wondering can police by law prosecute it later or there is time limit when police allowed to prosecute? In fact i was suspect and under surveleance. Another criminal case was opened against me. And this speeding offence could be linked to criminal case by police. They still have no evedence to arrest me and this never happens. Can police prosecute speeding offence 2 years later or even 3 or more?
Please no bullst, just reply if you know answer. Could be nice get answer from solicitor if we have online in this website. thank you
LOL.Please no bulls
t, just reply if you know answer. Could be nice get answer from solicitor if we have online in this website. thank youWhich motorway runs from Bristol to Dover ?
Back in 2004 I met up with a group of driving enthusiasts, and in the course of our discussions I made reference to a drive I'd done which involved speeds of up to 85 mph, all on single carriageway roads. That drive took place in 1968, but it didn't stop one of the group - who turned out to be a road safety fanatic - going to the police and trying to get them to prosecute me, albeit 36 years after the non-event!
That same individual also said that one of the justifications for having a 60 mph limit on single carriageway roads, was to protect against the possibility that a driver might suffer a heart attack and swerve over into the opposing traffic.
Life is getting too bloody dangerous for me, I really ought to go back to bed - and just hope the ceiling doesn't fall on me.
That same individual also said that one of the justifications for having a 60 mph limit on single carriageway roads, was to protect against the possibility that a driver might suffer a heart attack and swerve over into the opposing traffic.
Life is getting too bloody dangerous for me, I really ought to go back to bed - and just hope the ceiling doesn't fall on me.
TooMany2cvs said:
andriuzz said:
Done 110 miles in motorway from bristol to dover.
Seems odd not to use motorway for the whole distance, but there we go.andriuzz said:
I done speeding offence. Done 110 miles in motorway from bristol to dover. should get cought by quite few cameras. Done that almost 2 years ago, never received ticket or court summon order since then. Wondering can police by law prosecute it later or there is time limit when police allowed to prosecute? In fact i was suspect and under surveleance. Another criminal case was opened against me. And this speeding offence could be linked to criminal case by police. They still have no evedence to arrest me and this never happens. Can police prosecute speeding offence 2 years later or even 3 or more?
Please no bullst, just reply if you know answer. Could be nice get answer from solicitor if we have online in this website. thank you
depends- what motor were you in? were you driving? Please no bulls
t, just reply if you know answer. Could be nice get answer from solicitor if we have online in this website. thank younormally have to have NIP within 14 days or stopped at the time.
Edited by superlightr on Tuesday 13th February 12:35
[quote=p1esk]Back in 2004 I met up with a group of driving enthusiasts, and in the course of our discussions I made reference to a drive I'd done which involved speeds of up to 85 mph, all on single carriageway roads. That drive took place in 1968, but it didn't stop one of the group - who turned out to be a road safety fanatic - going to the police and trying to get them to prosecute me, albeit 36 years after the non-event!That same individual also said that one of the justifications for having a 60 mph limit on single carriageway roads, was to protect against the possibility that a driver might suffer a heart attack and swerve over into the opposing traffic.
What a Pr1ck!!!!
p1esk said:
Back in 2004 I met up with a group of driving enthusiasts, and in the course of our discussions I made reference to a drive I'd done which involved speeds of up to 85 mph, all on single carriageway roads. That drive took place in 1968, but it didn't stop one of the group - who turned out to be a road safety fanatic - going to the police and trying to get them to prosecute me, albeit 36 years after the non-event!
That same individual also said that one of the justifications for having a 60 mph limit on single carriageway roads, was to protect against the possibility that a driver might suffer a heart attack and swerve over into the opposing traffic.
Life is getting too bloody dangerous for me, I really ought to go back to bed - and just hope the ceiling doesn't fall on me.
That individual is a 'driving enthusiast'? Got people like that here in Oz. They also tend to think that they are perfect.That same individual also said that one of the justifications for having a 60 mph limit on single carriageway roads, was to protect against the possibility that a driver might suffer a heart attack and swerve over into the opposing traffic.
Life is getting too bloody dangerous for me, I really ought to go back to bed - and just hope the ceiling doesn't fall on me.
Even worse are those dashcam guys who comment on others and try to get the police to act on their video clips.
Len Woodman said:
p1esk said:
Back in 2004 I met up with a group of driving enthusiasts, and in the course of our discussions I made reference to a drive I'd done which involved speeds of up to 85 mph, all on single carriageway roads. That drive took place in 1968, but it didn't stop one of the group - who turned out to be a road safety fanatic - going to the police and trying to get them to prosecute me, albeit 36 years after the non-event!
That same individual also said that one of the justifications for having a 60 mph limit on single carriageway roads, was to protect against the possibility that a driver might suffer a heart attack and swerve over into the opposing traffic.
Life is getting too bloody dangerous for me, I really ought to go back to bed - and just hope the ceiling doesn't fall on me.
That individual is a 'driving enthusiast'? Got people like that here in Oz. They also tend to think that they are perfect.That same individual also said that one of the justifications for having a 60 mph limit on single carriageway roads, was to protect against the possibility that a driver might suffer a heart attack and swerve over into the opposing traffic.
Life is getting too bloody dangerous for me, I really ought to go back to bed - and just hope the ceiling doesn't fall on me.
Even worse are those dashcam guys who comment on others and try to get the police to act on their video clips.
Oh, excuse me, it's lunchtime - back later.
Forums | Speed, Plod & the Law | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff