Do UK Police do this, if not they should!
Discussion
Just found this video on YouTube, incredibly satisfying to watch the aussie bike cop pulling over drivers using their phone while driving. Given we also have bike cops in the UK, I wonder if they do blitzes like this on undercover bikes. As a biker, I can assure you that just filtering through a heavy line of traffic in a city centre you see dozens of people on their phones, this should be done.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9N1iw5Vdim8
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9N1iw5Vdim8
I often think of this.
If the Government employed bods to solely catch people on their phones and issue fixed penalties, surely it would generate revenue and hopefully combat the issue.
£200 a pop, I'm sure they could do a good few per hour. Sure, they would have to pay for training and resources but I think it would work wonders. People know they can get away with it - from my own observations the increase in fine/points has made absolutely zero difference.
If the Government employed bods to solely catch people on their phones and issue fixed penalties, surely it would generate revenue and hopefully combat the issue.
£200 a pop, I'm sure they could do a good few per hour. Sure, they would have to pay for training and resources but I think it would work wonders. People know they can get away with it - from my own observations the increase in fine/points has made absolutely zero difference.
94OD said:
I often think of this.
If the Government employed bods to solely catch people on their phones and issue fixed penalties, surely it would generate revenue and hopefully combat the issue.
£200 a pop, I'm sure they could do a good few per hour. Sure, they would have to pay for training and resources but I think it would work wonders. People know they can get away with it - from my own observations the increase in fine/points has made absolutely zero difference.
There's a street in St Albans called Holywell Hill. There's always a queue, and at least every other driver is tapping on their phone. I often thought that if they privatised ticketing I could make a fortune. It would be thousands of pounds an hour I reckon.If the Government employed bods to solely catch people on their phones and issue fixed penalties, surely it would generate revenue and hopefully combat the issue.
£200 a pop, I'm sure they could do a good few per hour. Sure, they would have to pay for training and resources but I think it would work wonders. People know they can get away with it - from my own observations the increase in fine/points has made absolutely zero difference.
2 sMoKiN bArReLs said:
94OD said:
I often think of this.
If the Government employed bods to solely catch people on their phones and issue fixed penalties, surely it would generate revenue and hopefully combat the issue.
£200 a pop, I'm sure they could do a good few per hour. Sure, they would have to pay for training and resources but I think it would work wonders. People know they can get away with it - from my own observations the increase in fine/points has made absolutely zero difference.
There's a street in St Albans called Holywell Hill. There's always a queue, and at least every other driver is tapping on their phone. I often thought that if they privatised ticketing I could make a fortune. It would be thousands of pounds an hour I reckon.If the Government employed bods to solely catch people on their phones and issue fixed penalties, surely it would generate revenue and hopefully combat the issue.
£200 a pop, I'm sure they could do a good few per hour. Sure, they would have to pay for training and resources but I think it would work wonders. People know they can get away with it - from my own observations the increase in fine/points has made absolutely zero difference.
If my phone beeps pings or bongs it can wait, if it rings i have a parrot kit fitted. there are good and bad points of hands free I appreciate that.
surveyor said:
While I get the phone safety thing and stopping people using their phones is a good idea it was interesting to note that everyone of those drivers was stopped at traffic lights.
That's still not an appropriate to be using your phone.They could miss bikes filtering down the middle of the two lanes and make a dangerous manouvre towards them. They could fail to notice an ambulance siren/lights (the last lady missed the police bike lights). They could fail notice a pedestrian stepping out in front of them in the stationary traffic or a filtering cyclist, they could fail to notice there's still someone on the pedestrian crossing. They could fail to notice the lights changing colour.
It's not okay to use your phone just because your at a traffic light. You need to be fully parked.
revvingit said:
surveyor said:
While I get the phone safety thing and stopping people using their phones is a good idea it was interesting to note that everyone of those drivers was stopped at traffic lights.
That's still not an appropriate to be using your phone.They could miss bikes filtering down the middle of the two lanes and make a dangerous manouvre towards them. They could fail to notice an ambulance siren/lights (the last lady missed the police bike lights). They could fail notice a pedestrian stepping out in front of them in the stationary traffic or a filtering cyclist, they could fail to notice there's still someone on the pedestrian crossing. They could fail to notice the lights changing colour.
It's not okay to use your phone just because your at a traffic light. You need to be fully parked.
surveyor said:
revvingit said:
surveyor said:
While I get the phone safety thing and stopping people using their phones is a good idea it was interesting to note that everyone of those drivers was stopped at traffic lights.
That's still not an appropriate to be using your phone.They could miss bikes filtering down the middle of the two lanes and make a dangerous manouvre towards them. They could fail to notice an ambulance siren/lights (the last lady missed the police bike lights). They could fail notice a pedestrian stepping out in front of them in the stationary traffic or a filtering cyclist, they could fail to notice there's still someone on the pedestrian crossing. They could fail to notice the lights changing colour.
It's not okay to use your phone just because your at a traffic light. You need to be fully parked.
I seem to remember seeing one county has an unmarked lorry that catches people on their stretch of motorway using phones. Obviously they have an excellent high up view.
Although better police training might help too. I couldn’t believe my eyes last week. At a very busy multi traffic light junction a police car was coming through the traffic at speed, blues and twos. All very tight manoeuvres, the driver had one hand on the wheel and drinking a Starbucks with the other hand. Wish I had a dash camera.
Although better police training might help too. I couldn’t believe my eyes last week. At a very busy multi traffic light junction a police car was coming through the traffic at speed, blues and twos. All very tight manoeuvres, the driver had one hand on the wheel and drinking a Starbucks with the other hand. Wish I had a dash camera.
It can be irritating watching people are texting whilst stationary but it's not dangerous imo. I leave them to it. I don't see them colliding into other cars or causing accidents. This illustrates some of the more stupid aspects of mobile phone legislation. I was happy with current legislation that covered aspects of dangerous driving.
Boosted LS1 said:
It can be irritating watching people are texting whilst stationary but it's not dangerous imo. I leave them to it. I don't see them colliding into other cars or causing accidents. This illustrates some of the more stupid aspects of mobile phone legislation. I was happy with current legislation that covered aspects of dangerous driving.
They lose awareness of what's going on around. They also often set off still not having finished their essential texting. Forums | Speed, Plod & the Law | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff



