Juror jailed for accepting bribe
Discussion
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-glasgow-west...
h.
BBC said:
A juror who took a bribe during a five-month money laundering and drug trafficking trial has been jailed for six years.
Catherine Leahy, 62, accepted almost £3,000 in inappropriate payments while deliberating during proceedings at the High Court in Glasgow.
The former classroom assistant was caught after police received a tip-off.
Leahy was the spokeswoman on a jury which acquitted an alleged drug dealer. Prosecutors are considering a retrial.
It is the first case of its type in Scottish legal history. No jurors have previously been prosecuted in Scotland for corrupt behaviour.
Stupid bCatherine Leahy, 62, accepted almost £3,000 in inappropriate payments while deliberating during proceedings at the High Court in Glasgow.
The former classroom assistant was caught after police received a tip-off.
Leahy was the spokeswoman on a jury which acquitted an alleged drug dealer. Prosecutors are considering a retrial.
It is the first case of its type in Scottish legal history. No jurors have previously been prosecuted in Scotland for corrupt behaviour.
h.R8Steve said:
I'm actually quite surprised that listening devices are used in such a manner.
How did they get it into the house?
I dont know but was thinking maybe they get you cut off with your Sky/Cable and then send someone round. Interseted to know as this would limit conversations to one room maybe.How did they get it into the house?
PAULJ5555 said:
R8Steve said:
I'm actually quite surprised that listening devices are used in such a manner.
How did they get it into the house?
I dont know but was thinking maybe they get you cut off with your Sky/Cable and then send someone round. Interseted to know as this would limit conversations to one room maybe.How did they get it into the house?
Lots of locks can be forced without you ever knowing
TwistingMyMelon said:
PAULJ5555 said:
R8Steve said:
I'm actually quite surprised that listening devices are used in such a manner.
How did they get it into the house?
I dont know but was thinking maybe they get you cut off with your Sky/Cable and then send someone round. Interseted to know as this would limit conversations to one room maybe.How did they get it into the house?
Lots of locks can be forced without you ever knowing
98elise said:
Agreed. Almost everyone has their price, Its just how far you are prepared to bend the law, and what price you put on it.
3k for throwing a trial is beyond stupidity.
Also it appears a bank transfer so able to trace money back as well.3k for throwing a trial is beyond stupidity.
It is ironic the original trial was for money laundering though
98elise said:
TwistingMyMelon said:
PAULJ5555 said:
R8Steve said:
I'm actually quite surprised that listening devices are used in such a manner.
How did they get it into the house?
I dont know but was thinking maybe they get you cut off with your Sky/Cable and then send someone round. Interseted to know as this would limit conversations to one room maybe.How did they get it into the house?
Lots of locks can be forced without you ever knowing
I will say I found jury service an eye opener.
First day of case, break for lunch, walk into town to get something to eat, who is walking just behind me? One of the defendants!
I had to walk through the families waiting area to get to mine every day, and every day they would try and talk, and the worst of it was, after the case, we acquitted some of the people on trial and on the way out after the case was closed there were the familes trying to thank me.
I nearly told them to eff off as I was outvoted in my jury and would have convicted at least one of them!
Was an unpleasant and rather sad experience, but to accept a bribe is borderline moronic, the cretin who did this should also be done as should more sentence be added to who is related to.,
First day of case, break for lunch, walk into town to get something to eat, who is walking just behind me? One of the defendants!
I had to walk through the families waiting area to get to mine every day, and every day they would try and talk, and the worst of it was, after the case, we acquitted some of the people on trial and on the way out after the case was closed there were the familes trying to thank me.
I nearly told them to eff off as I was outvoted in my jury and would have convicted at least one of them!
Was an unpleasant and rather sad experience, but to accept a bribe is borderline moronic, the cretin who did this should also be done as should more sentence be added to who is related to.,
pavarotti1980 said:
98elise said:
Agreed. Almost everyone has their price, Its just how far you are prepared to bend the law, and what price you put on it.
3k for throwing a trial is beyond stupidity.
Also it appears a bank transfer so able to trace money back as well.3k for throwing a trial is beyond stupidity.
It is ironic the original trial was for money laundering though
Foliage said:
98elise said:
TwistingMyMelon said:
PAULJ5555 said:
R8Steve said:
I'm actually quite surprised that listening devices are used in such a manner.
How did they get it into the house?
I dont know but was thinking maybe they get you cut off with your Sky/Cable and then send someone round. Interseted to know as this would limit conversations to one room maybe.How did they get it into the house?
Lots of locks can be forced without you ever knowing

Forums | Speed, Plod & the Law | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff


