An interesting ongoing trial

[joyless lobotomised parrot]

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-glasgow-west...

If you're going to stitch someone up for a murder or two you'd be well advised to first of all check the witness you've perverted isn't intellectually disadvantaged.

Bets on how long the rest of the case lasts?

Edited by joyless lobotomised parrot on Wednesday 2nd May 18:23

[vonhosen]

joyless lobotomised parrot said:

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-glasgow-west...

If you're going to stitch someone up for a murder or two you'd be well advised to first of all check the witness you've perverted isn't wonky in the nut.

There are other possibilities of course.

[joyless lobotomised parrot]

Really? Lady Stacey and AD Prentice QC must have let that slip by them then

[vonhosen]

joyless lobotomised parrot said:

Really? Lady Stacey and AD Prentice QC must have let that slip by them then

They've got no option to deal with it as it unfolded in front of them, when it's sprung like that in court. How can they do anything else?

The possibility still exists that he could have been got at by the other side too.
It does happen you know.
http://news.met.police.uk/news/woman-jailed-for-pe...

What needs to follow is an investigation to find out the full circumstances & then appropriate action from it (where ever that investigation leads).

[anonymous-user]

joyless lobotomised parrot said:

If you're going to stitch someone up for a murder or two you'd be well advised to first of all check the witness you've perverted isn't wonky in the nut.

The same witness you're seemingly relying on to conclude they've tried to 'stitch up' the accused.

Nice description, BTW...

[joyless lobotomised parrot]

Ah. Right. Best amend my op then. Is "intellectually disadvantaged" less offensive?

(ps: wonder how he's being described back at the station. )

Edited by joyless lobotomised parrot on Wednesday 2nd May 18:24