Road markings. Legal or advisable?
Discussion
Bored sunday afternoon post.
I came across a junction the other day, where I saw 2 buses going through a no entry sign. On passing the junction, I saw that on the road its stated "Bus & Cycles Only". By the looks of it, it has been here for years, but got me wondering whether the buses passing the sign would actually be breaking the law or not.
Streetview link
https://www.google.com/maps/@52.5312795,-1.8584804...
I came across a junction the other day, where I saw 2 buses going through a no entry sign. On passing the junction, I saw that on the road its stated "Bus & Cycles Only". By the looks of it, it has been here for years, but got me wondering whether the buses passing the sign would actually be breaking the law or not.
Streetview link
https://www.google.com/maps/@52.5312795,-1.8584804...
Lopey said:
Bored sunday afternoon post.
I came across a junction the other day, where I saw 2 buses going through a no entry sign. On passing the junction, I saw that on the road its stated "Bus & Cycles Only". By the looks of it, it has been here for years, but got me wondering whether the buses passing the sign would actually be breaking the law or not.
Streetview link
https://www.google.com/maps/@52.5312795,-1.8584804...
What does the TRO for it say?I came across a junction the other day, where I saw 2 buses going through a no entry sign. On passing the junction, I saw that on the road its stated "Bus & Cycles Only". By the looks of it, it has been here for years, but got me wondering whether the buses passing the sign would actually be breaking the law or not.
Streetview link
https://www.google.com/maps/@52.5312795,-1.8584804...
OP - road markings are legal and are classed as 'flat' signs.
(eg. no overtaking double whites don't require an adjacent "no overtaking" vertical sign each time they are encountered)
However, as my business works alongside some road authorities, it would appear that the set up in the street-view link, in my independent opinion at least, should have the vehicle exemption plate underneath the "no entry" roundel on the vertical sign.
Vertical signs are often considered 'primary' with flat signs (road markings) considered 'secondary'.
(eg. flat signs may be obscured by other vehicle(s) slowly moving over the top of them - so the 'primary' sign should always provide sufficient information).
(eg. no overtaking double whites don't require an adjacent "no overtaking" vertical sign each time they are encountered)
However, as my business works alongside some road authorities, it would appear that the set up in the street-view link, in my independent opinion at least, should have the vehicle exemption plate underneath the "no entry" roundel on the vertical sign.
Vertical signs are often considered 'primary' with flat signs (road markings) considered 'secondary'.
(eg. flat signs may be obscured by other vehicle(s) slowly moving over the top of them - so the 'primary' sign should always provide sufficient information).
Forums | Speed, Plod & the Law | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff


