new MOT tests - oil leak
new MOT tests - oil leak
Author
Discussion

5lab

Original Poster:

1,920 posts

225 months

Tuesday 24th July 2018
quotequote all
My bangernomics car went into it's MOT yesterday, and failed on (amongst other things), 'excessive oil leak from engine'.

The engine definitely has an oil leak, and has had for years (so the engine bay is coated), but it is slow - it gets through about 1l oil every 10,000 miles (so 0.1ml every mile), including what burns off as well as what drips.

The MOT manual https://www.mot-testing.service.gov.uk/documents/m... (also quoted below) mentions a vehicle should be failed if it creates a 75mm puddle within 5 minutes of idling - my car definitely does not do this - I tested this morning and there were 2 drips on a piece of paper after 5 minutes.

Am I right in asserting that if a vehicle doesn't create a 75mm puddle, it should pass, or can the tester still consider whatever drips to be 'excessive' and fail it anyway? The fix (oil cooler seal) is awkward, and I'd rather not spend £150 and 8 hours on a car unlikely to last another year if I can help it smile

mot_manual said:
8.4.1 Fluid leaks
You must check for fluid leaks on all vehicles other than Class 3. You should do this with the engine idling.

A leak of fluids such as engine coolant, screen wash and fluid required for Selective Catalyst Reduction aren't reasons for failure. You should fail a vehicle if a fluid leak creates a pool on the floor within 5 minutes that's more than 75mm in diameter or if there are many leaks which collectively leak fluid at the same rate.

You can refuse to carry out the test if there's an excessive fluid leak. For details see item 4 in the 'Introduction' of this inspection manual.

Defect Category
Fluid:
leaking excessively and likely to harm the environment or to pose a safety risk to other road users
Major
leaking continuously and likely to pose a serious risk to road safety
Dangerous

5lab

Original Poster:

1,920 posts

225 months

Tuesday 24th July 2018
quotequote all
any friendly MOT testers clocked off for the evening?

Athlon

5,892 posts

235 months

Tuesday 24th July 2018
quotequote all
I would pass it with an advise, I have only failed one on oil leaks and it was pouring out, I see loads with wet undertrays or the odd drip but they are not fails.

I would question it to be honest

paintman

7,860 posts

219 months

Tuesday 24th July 2018
quotequote all
Get a bag of rags. (Motor factors etc)
Clean the engine bay/engine/gearbox etc. If it's slathered in oil you're not helping yourself.
Book re-test.
Stop round corner from test station en route to re-test.
Use rags to mop up any oil.
Go to test station.


Edited by paintman on Tuesday 24th July 20:04

gazza285

11,164 posts

237 months

Tuesday 24th July 2018
quotequote all
5lab said:
I'd rather not spend £150 and 8 hours on a car unlikely to last another year if I can help it
Looks like the alternative is not spend £150 and eight hours on a car that is without an MOT. If the tester thinks it's posing a danger, then the 75mm patch is irrelevant.

Cold

16,704 posts

119 months

Tuesday 24th July 2018
quotequote all
paintman said:
Get a bag of rags. (Motor factors etc)
Clean the engine bay/engine/gearbox etc. If it's slathered in oil you're not helping yourself.
Book re-test.
Stop round corner from test station en route to re-test.
Use rags to mop up any oil.
Go to test station.
Yep, clean it. Jetwash and degrease it if possible.

surveyor_101

5,069 posts

208 months

Wednesday 25th July 2018
quotequote all
From what I can see MOTs come with a certain amount of artistic licence.

I see cars with engine warning lights air bag warning lights on the advisory list, isn't that a failure? I have seen cars with illegal plates with comments like plate distorted but not likely to be misread. Green front led lights with ’bulbs slightly discoloured’ on the advisory sheet.

I also know of garages where I live that do advisory free Mots Even if the car had umpteen previous advisories.




KungFuPanda

4,640 posts

199 months

Wednesday 25th July 2018
quotequote all
Coat the engine bay with spray on degreaser and give the engine a decent jet wash then take it for another MOT elsewhere.

Jaguar steve

9,232 posts

239 months

Wednesday 25th July 2018
quotequote all
MOT testing seems to be moving away from the simple requirement of examining a car to make sure it's roadworthy and more towards either encouraging owners to have non saftey related repairs done or nudging thoughts towards buying a replacement by piling on a long list of advisories and minor wear and tear items you'd find on any older car.

Since the government makes money out of every repair and really cleans up every time somebody changes their car and the government sets the requirements and format of the MOT test it's not hard to work out whats going on.


Mr2Mike

20,143 posts

284 months

Wednesday 25th July 2018
quotequote all
Jaguar steve said:
Since the government makes money out of every repair
How do you work that out?

surveyor_101

5,069 posts

208 months

Wednesday 25th July 2018
quotequote all
Mr2Mike said:
How do you work that out?
  1. VAT 20%

BertBert

21,265 posts

240 months

Wednesday 25th July 2018
quotequote all
Phone up the MoT place (or even better) and ask them to look at it again in the basis that it doesn't meet the criteria for a fail?
Or book a restest with or without cleaning (up to you) first? Then if they fail it again, point out it doesn't meet the criteria?
Bert

Mr2Mike

20,143 posts

284 months

Wednesday 25th July 2018
quotequote all
surveyor_101 said:
  1. VAT 20%
Is ths actually about the perceived unfairness of the costs of running a car? Parts will need to be bought to keep a car running cleanly and safely over its useful life, thats just life.

I dont want st heaps on the road leaking oil, if people cant be bothered to maintain their cars properly then thats tough luck on them.

Jaguar steve

9,232 posts

239 months

Wednesday 25th July 2018
quotequote all
surveyor_101 said:
Mr2Mike said:
How do you work that out?
  1. VAT 20%
That of course and business profit which is taxed. Simply put more business = more tax revenue for the government.

Decide to change your car and under the new VED arrangements seller and buyer both loose a months VED meaning both pay 13 months and not 12 for that year. Multiply that by however many cars change hands each month and you'll see exactly why that pernicious little scam was introduced.

Not only that but your insurance company will be delighted to knob you for an extortionate admin fee for some poor sap earning peanuts in a Indian call centre to press a few buttons on a keyboard at 2am .

Replacing cars also stimulate peripheral sales for accessories from spare keys to bike racks to new floor mats and polish.

It's all about making money from you...

Mr2Mike

20,143 posts

284 months

Wednesday 25th July 2018
quotequote all
Wahhh! I can't own and drive a car for nothing, the UK is such a rip off!!

5lab

Original Poster:

1,920 posts

225 months

Wednesday 25th July 2018
quotequote all
thanks for all the replies. I've decided to take a multi-pronged approach, spraying the hell out of it with degreaser, then jetwashing it to buggery, wiping it all down, then taking it to the centre and (if it fails) asking them to show me a 75mm puddle. if all that fails, i'll get on with the seals.

It seems the answer to the original question is 'at the testers discretion', which is ok, but not quite what I expected. Incidentally this was classed as a failure, rather than an advisory or a dangerous fault (all 3 categories can exist for a fluid leak)

Jaguar steve

9,232 posts

239 months

Wednesday 25th July 2018
quotequote all
Mr2Mike said:
Wahhh! I can't own and drive a car for nothing, the UK is such a rip off!!


It is. And it's getting more so by the day.



swagmeister

382 posts

121 months

Wednesday 25th July 2018
quotequote all
Yup going back to the same place, and a good chance the same tester, questioning his judgement, yeh I can see that working well for you.

Sheepshanks

41,028 posts

148 months

Wednesday 25th July 2018
quotequote all
5lab said:
The fix (oil cooler seal) is awkward,
Can you get at it? I'm wondering if there's some automotive equivalent of Fernox LS-X - that you'd use on a plumbing weep - that you could slather all over it?

5lab

Original Poster:

1,920 posts

225 months

Wednesday 25th July 2018
quotequote all
swagmeister said:
Yup going back to the same place, and a good chance the same tester, questioning his judgement, yeh I can see that working well for you.
well going back to the same place is free. Going to a different place is £50, and a risk they'll find other stuff that's likely wrong with the car

Sheepshanks said:
Can you get at it? I'm wondering if there's some automotive equivalent of Fernox LS-X - that you'd use on a plumbing weep - that you could slather all over it?
sadly not, its buried behind a heat shield, behind an exhaust manifold. details here -> https://www.vauxhallownersnetwork.co.uk/index.php?...