Is speeding socially acceptable?
Is speeding socially acceptable?
Author
Discussion

Beggarall

Original Poster:

591 posts

271 months

Wednesday 15th August 2018
quotequote all
Strange question maybe but Hertfordshire Police have published this questionnaire canvassing the views of local residents about their attitude to speeding no doubt seeking justification for more rigorous enforcement. As i see it, these sorts of questionnaires are often very badly written and in this case lacking a lot of definition. Is speeding socially acceptable? Well, I suspect most of us do it at sometime so I would say a bit over the limit is socially OK - but it depends where. I don't think anyone would disagree that 60 in a 30 outside a school was socially unacceptable - but where do you draw the line. Just musing....

Johnnytheboy

24,499 posts

216 months

Wednesday 15th August 2018
quotequote all
Where it's safe, yes.

Centurion07

10,395 posts

277 months

Wednesday 15th August 2018
quotequote all
As the saying goes..."anyone slower than me is a fking idiot, anyone faster than me is a fking idiot".

anonymous-user

84 months

Wednesday 15th August 2018
quotequote all
As above. Where it is safe. Not on a residential street for example.

plenty

5,036 posts

216 months

Wednesday 15th August 2018
quotequote all
What a surprise - it's a terrible questionnaire.

No consideration of context, just a binary Yes/No to most of the questions. "Would you feel safe if the driver was speeding?"
If travelling at 61 mph on a clearly-sighted and empty NSL road in dry conditions? Or at 50 mph past a school on a foggy wet winter's morning?

I suppose this exemplifies the anti-speeding lobby - there can only be black and white, never any shades of grey.

Graveworm

9,237 posts

101 months

Wednesday 15th August 2018
quotequote all
Johnnytheboy said:
Where it's safe, yes.
I get that, dangerous at any speed is and should be socially unacceptable. So is it OK to say it's the dangerous rather than the speeding. If we could distill that down then there would be no requirement for speed limits. I think a small minority think speeding is evil but society as a whole is fairly pragmatic so it is socially acceptable in isolation. This is born out by the levels of compliance. 81% of cars exceed 20mph limits, 53 percent exceed 30 mph but only 6 percent exceed 60 mph on single carriageway it rises again to 43 percent on motorways. Those significantly exceeding 20 and 30 mph are pretty low.

Our roads are relatively safe and only on the single carriageway NSL roads can speeding be shown to increase risk of being involved in a Serious collision. It would seem that behavior follows what is "Safe" and is usually indicative of what is viewed as acceptable.

BaronVonVaderham

2,322 posts

177 months

Wednesday 15th August 2018
quotequote all
Fillled in. Can I suggest that as many of us fill it in in the manner in which it’s been written (ie badly wink ) as possible?

Shuvi McTupya

24,460 posts

277 months

Wednesday 15th August 2018
quotequote all
Done smile

catso

16,457 posts

297 months

Wednesday 15th August 2018
quotequote all
plenty said:
What a surprise - it's a terrible questionnaire.

No consideration of context, just a binary Yes/No to most of the questions. "Would you feel safe if the driver was speeding?"
If travelling at 61 mph on a clearly-sighted and empty NSL road in dry conditions? Or at 50 mph past a school on a foggy wet winter's morning?

I suppose this exemplifies the anti-speeding lobby - there can only be black and white, never any shades of grey.
I think primary school students may have compiled it...

Boosted LS1

21,200 posts

290 months

Wednesday 15th August 2018
quotequote all
Yes, it's acceptable to me if safe to do so. I drive to the conditions I find myself in and speed where it's safe.

Vaud

59,562 posts

185 months

Wednesday 15th August 2018
quotequote all
FFS what a biased questionnaire...

Red 4

10,744 posts

217 months

Wednesday 15th August 2018
quotequote all
Graveworm said:
Our roads are relatively safe and only on the single carriageway NSL roads can speeding be shown to increase risk of being involved in a Serious collision.
Nope ( to the second bit ).

It also depends on what you hit ( pedestrian, motorcyclist, etc ) or what hits you.

Shuvi McTupya

24,460 posts

277 months

Wednesday 15th August 2018
quotequote all
We have just had a brand new 5 mile stretch of lovely smooth, open dual carriageway open locally and hardly anyone is using it. My 74 yr old mother drove it the other day and was shocked when she glanced at the speedo and saw she was touching 90mph.

It feels perfectly safe when the road is designed properly.


MC Bodge

29,743 posts

205 months

Wednesday 15th August 2018
quotequote all
If driving to the conditions, visibility, with attention, good observation, smoothly, and with mechanical sympathy, it shouldn't be.

The limits are set fairly arbitrarily. Very low in some places.

Graveworm

9,237 posts

101 months

Wednesday 15th August 2018
quotequote all
Red 4 said:
Nope ( to the second bit ).

It also depends on what you hit ( pedestrian, motorcyclist, etc ) or what hits you.
Faster increases the risk and the severity nearly all the time but that doesn't mean that when and where people exceed the speed limit they are more likely to be involved in a serious RTA than when and where they comply. The statistics indicate very strongly that is the case. Other than on single carriage NSL the percentage of vehicles exceeding the speed limit is far in excess of the percentage of collisions where one or more vehicles were exceeding the speed limit. (3% or 15% depending on whether you believe the police or pressure groups). Given the mean number of vehicles in an accident has to exceed one it is very hard to come to any other conclusion.

CharlieH89

9,080 posts

195 months

Wednesday 15th August 2018
quotequote all
Be interesting to know what people think is acceptable through a 20mph zone going through a village. Shops either side of the 20mph limited road.
People seem to think 40mph+ is acceptable as I see everyday. I’ve never seen a police speed camera set up.
Village is Rainhill, L35.

MC Bodge

29,743 posts

205 months

Wednesday 15th August 2018
quotequote all
CharlieH89 said:
Be interesting to know what people think is acceptable through a 20mph zone going through a village. Shops either side of the 20mph limited road.
People seem to think 40mph+ is acceptable as I see everyday. I’ve never seen a police speed camera set up.
Village is Rainhill, L35.
I thought you were describing a Cotswolds hamlet, then I read "Rainhill". A village??? From memory, it would have been a reasonable 30mph last time I drove through there on the A57.

Red 4

10,744 posts

217 months

Wednesday 15th August 2018
quotequote all
Graveworm said:
Red 4 said:
Nope ( to the second bit ).

It also depends on what you hit ( pedestrian, motorcyclist, etc ) or what hits you.
Faster increases the risk and the severity nearly all the time but that doesn't mean that when and where people exceed the speed limit they are more likely to be involved in a serious RTA than when and where they comply. The statistics indicate very strongly that is the case. Other than on single carriage NSL the percentage of vehicles exceeding the speed limit is far in excess of the percentage of collisions where one or more vehicles were exceeding the speed limit. (3% or 15% depending on whether you believe the police or pressure groups). Given the mean number of vehicles in an accident has to exceed one it is very hard to come to any other conclusion.
Sorry mate, I haven't got a fking clue what you are on about biggrin

Graveworm

9,237 posts

101 months

Wednesday 15th August 2018
quotequote all
Red 4 said:
Sorry mate, I haven't got a fking clue what you are on about biggrin
Nearly all accidents happen when and where people are driving within the speed limit.

CanAm

14,015 posts

302 months

Wednesday 15th August 2018
quotequote all
BaronVonVaderham said:
Fillled in. Can I suggest that as many of us fill it in in the manner in which it’s been written (ie badly wink ) as possible?
Definitely +1