Mileage discrepancy on ebay ad and actual MOT history
Mileage discrepancy on ebay ad and actual MOT history
Author
Discussion

jondude

Original Poster:

2,441 posts

247 months

Friday 8th March 2019
quotequote all
So was looking at a 'great, excellent' Range Rover ad on e-bay and run the MOT history check. Car has only failed on tyres and windscreen wipers before so about to bid....then notice the MOT tester has listed the year's mileages as...46,000....55,000.....38,,000 and now the 45 or so she is advertising at. So in one year the mileage reduced from 55, 000 to 38,000.......

I could ask for an explanation but already have worries. Could there be any real explanation (apart from maintaining the tester made an error) and is there a legal requirement to address this on ebay? I can imagine ALL buyers will be right peed off and stressed if they buy this car then notice this.

sim72

4,998 posts

164 months

Friday 8th March 2019
quotequote all
One dubious mileage record could be a typo by the MOT tester. However if it's gone 55K -> 38K -> 45K that's two, which would suggest the mileage has been adjusted. With older cars this can sometimes be because the clocks have been changed but I'm guessing this is a newer vehicle for which that wouldn't apply.

Having said that, 55K -> 38K is an odd bit of clocking. How old is the car?

deckster

9,631 posts

285 months

Friday 8th March 2019
quotequote all
jondude said:
'great, excellent' Range Rover ... failed on tyres and windscreen wipers
Everything else aside, if a owner can't be bothered with the basics then I can't imagine they'll have been especially scrupulous about the rest of the maintenance. Sounds like the kind of person who treats the MOT as a "tell me what I need to fix on my car" alternative to actually servicing the thing.

jondude

Original Poster:

2,441 posts

247 months

Friday 8th March 2019
quotequote all
Thanks,.good points

- 2011 Range Rover Sport.

SteveR1979

601 posts

171 months

Friday 8th March 2019
quotequote all
Why would there be a legal requirement to declare it??
You assume the seller knows about it in the first place.

CubanPete

3,806 posts

218 months

Friday 8th March 2019
quotequote all


Ping him a message and ask out of curiosity, but it Sounds dubious, what SH is advertised?

Plenty of RRS out there. I'd look for another.

Trevor555

5,437 posts

114 months

Friday 8th March 2019
quotequote all
Well spotted, you've dodged yourself a bullet there.

Even if there's an explanation for it do you want to be trying to explain it when you come to sell?

jondude

Original Poster:

2,441 posts

247 months

Friday 8th March 2019
quotequote all
Again, thanks all for the posts.

Yes, do think I will give this a miss and leave it, look elsewhere.

ging84

9,548 posts

176 months

Friday 8th March 2019
quotequote all
it's not really worth bidding on, it's lost 7k, plus a years worth of miles, so most likely 10-20k
That's probably a £1k+ difference in value, and other bidders may not even know about it

KEITHOA

67 posts

130 months

Saturday 9th March 2019
quotequote all
can the clock be changed from km to miles
Maybe it was in kilometres then changed to miles

Red Devil

13,516 posts

238 months

Saturday 9th March 2019
quotequote all
sim72 said:
One dubious mileage record could be a typo by the MOT tester. However if it's gone 55K -> 38K -> 45K that's two, which would suggest the mileage has been adjusted. With older cars this can sometimes be because the clocks have been changed but I'm guessing this is a newer vehicle for which that wouldn't apply.

Having said that, 55K -> 38K is an odd bit of clocking. How old is the car?
How do you come to the conclusion that's two typos? A 7k increase from 38 to 45 could be quite legit. It's the earlier reduction that requires an explanation.
It is even possible that the discrepancy occurred during a previous ownership and the current owner never bothered to check.
I wouldn't jump to conclusions without evidence/proof. Still a good reason to be wary though. Ask the question , await the answer, then decide.

ging84

9,548 posts

176 months

Saturday 9th March 2019
quotequote all
Red Devil said:
How do you come to the conclusion that's two typos? A 7k increase from 38 to 45 could be quite legit. It's the earlier reduction that requires an explanation.
It is even possible that the discrepancy occurred during a previous ownership and the current owner never bothered to check.
I wouldn't jump to conclusions without evidence/proof. Still a good reason to be wary though. Ask the question , await the answer, then decide.
46 55 38 45
If 45 is correct the 55 and the 46 must have been wrong, that's 2 errors

Red Devil

13,516 posts

238 months

Saturday 9th March 2019
quotequote all
Ooops! My General Belgrano moment. wobblerotate

Cold

16,708 posts

120 months

Sunday 10th March 2019
quotequote all
The lcd info displays on those can fail so perhaps it's had a used replacement set of clocks?

E36GUY

5,907 posts

248 months

Wednesday 13th March 2019
quotequote all
Cold said:
The lcd info displays on those can fail so perhaps it's had a used replacement set of clocks?
Surely however, in this day of modern tech a set of replacement clocks can be programmed to the correct milage presumably stored in the OBC somewhere?

stevensdrs

3,264 posts

230 months

Wednesday 13th March 2019
quotequote all
Regardless of what the clocks say, the correct mileage is recorded in the ecu and the body control modules so not a difficult task to check.

TooLateForAName

4,929 posts

214 months

Wednesday 13th March 2019
quotequote all
clocking is rife on lease/PCP cars.