Did Police Over React Here
Discussion
Were police assaulting this protester at Manchester United?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jD3r7LFFUxY
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jD3r7LFFUxY
flashbang said:
I heard on the news that two officers got severely injured but don't know the nature of the injuries.
What were the protesters there for? I don't really follow football.
Manchester United protest: Supporters group urges co-chairman to engage with fans https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/56969755What were the protesters there for? I don't really follow football.
As said already, it would be interesting to see what happened first.
But as they dragged the guy back, the "assaulting" officer was hovering round and seemed eager to get some punches in, despite not really being involved in holding the guy (who at that point at least) didn't seem to be resisting.
The pc was also very angry... presumably wound up by what had taken place.
I'm surprised the police let press (?) roam round behind them like that as it's probably quite distracting, though policeman thinking clearly enough to keep the cameras away from what was taking place.
I've never policed a protest, but imagine polite language and asking nicely quickly become ineffective.
So there will be a point where force and general shoutiness is needed, but think it is right that those using force be reminded they are still accountable for their choices.
Ian
But as they dragged the guy back, the "assaulting" officer was hovering round and seemed eager to get some punches in, despite not really being involved in holding the guy (who at that point at least) didn't seem to be resisting.
The pc was also very angry... presumably wound up by what had taken place.
I'm surprised the police let press (?) roam round behind them like that as it's probably quite distracting, though policeman thinking clearly enough to keep the cameras away from what was taking place.
I've never policed a protest, but imagine polite language and asking nicely quickly become ineffective.
So there will be a point where force and general shoutiness is needed, but think it is right that those using force be reminded they are still accountable for their choices.
Ian
vonhosen said:
Looked like he was dragged from the driver's door of the lorry.
Two have got hold of his arms & are struggling to get them where they want them, whilst the third is doing distraction blows to the legs.
I'm trying to understand your comment.Two have got hold of his arms & are struggling to get them where they want them, whilst the third is doing distraction blows to the legs.
Have you more info on the threat level?
Did this guy have a weapon? or recently used one? A knife maybe? Suspected of having a weapon?
Trevor555 said:
vonhosen said:
Looked like he was dragged from the driver's door of the lorry.
Two have got hold of his arms & are struggling to get them where they want them, whilst the third is doing distraction blows to the legs.
I'm trying to understand your comment.Two have got hold of his arms & are struggling to get them where they want them, whilst the third is doing distraction blows to the legs.
Have you more info on the threat level?
Did this guy have a weapon? or recently used one? A knife maybe? Suspected of having a weapon?
The threat level or weapons don't come into what it looked like on the images available, but those things may have a bearing on whether it's justifiable though.
vonhosen said:
Trevor555 said:
vonhosen said:
Looked like he was dragged from the driver's door of the lorry.
Two have got hold of his arms & are struggling to get them where they want them, whilst the third is doing distraction blows to the legs.
I'm trying to understand your comment.Two have got hold of his arms & are struggling to get them where they want them, whilst the third is doing distraction blows to the legs.
Have you more info on the threat level?
Did this guy have a weapon? or recently used one? A knife maybe? Suspected of having a weapon?
The threat level or weapons don't come into what it looked like on the images available, but those things may have a bearing on whether it's justifiable though.
I'm usually one of the first to line up to criticise over zealous policing, mainly as it is completely unnecessary/little men abusing their power/bullying/assault/poor training.
That said, I'm struggling to see how three largely ineffectual punches to the alleged perps thighs and/or balls in the context of that level of unrest is an over reaction. If you go out looking for aggro then getting some back is part of the sport.
The same punches the face/baton/pepper spray etc would be a different ball game (excuse the pun). Nothing to see here.
That said, I'm struggling to see how three largely ineffectual punches to the alleged perps thighs and/or balls in the context of that level of unrest is an over reaction. If you go out looking for aggro then getting some back is part of the sport.
The same punches the face/baton/pepper spray etc would be a different ball game (excuse the pun). Nothing to see here.
Gman20 said:
Trevor555 said:
I just wondered if you had more info on what had just happened beforehand to justify "distraction blows"
Standard excuse for police brutality.As said though, it's something (like any use of force) that has to be justifiable in the circumstances.
Forums | Speed, Plod & the Law | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff


