£2300 fine for 105 mph on M3
£2300 fine for 105 mph on M3
Author
Discussion

Heaveho

Original Poster:

7,448 posts

203 months

Thursday 20th May 2021
quotequote all
The article doesn't mention any other infringements, just speeding. Indeed, it's a short piece with little detail, in a Bournemouth rag. For reasons pertaining to incompetence, I can't link it.

The outcome seems a bit bloody stringent on the face of it!

Apologies if this is going on somewhere else on here, I didn't see anything else about it.

Oilchange

9,702 posts

289 months

Thursday 20th May 2021
quotequote all
I think the fines are income related so the defendant might have been loaded

ScoobyChris

2,307 posts

231 months

Thursday 20th May 2021
quotequote all
Band C fine I think which is starting point 150% net weekly income, capped at £2500 for motorway offences.

Chris

Saleen836

12,494 posts

238 months

Heaveho

Original Poster:

7,448 posts

203 months

Thursday 20th May 2021
quotequote all
Oilchange said:
I think the fines are income related so the defendant might have been loaded
It's the only conclusion I could come to without more info, but it seemed a bit ott for what and where.

PurpleTurtle

8,859 posts

173 months

Thursday 20th May 2021
quotequote all
Address checks out on Google Maps as a nicely heeled suburb of Bournemouth and she was driving a Q7 at 50% above NSL.

Can't do the time, don't do the crime etc etc .... (yeah, I know, loads of us have done it, most of us try our best to keep a good look out).

Income related fine and 6 points, not really much to see here, happens all the time,

(I'm not condoning it, one hopes she learns an expensive lesson and keeps it under 3 figures in future).

Edited by PurpleTurtle on Thursday 20th May 18:58

blitzracing

6,422 posts

249 months

Thursday 20th May 2021
quotequote all
A Q7 at that speed has the same kinetic energy as a small H bomb methinks, and in the hands of a woman who no doubt needs such ridiculous bulk its to look after fragile little Jonny on the school run?

normalbloke

8,859 posts

248 months

Thursday 20th May 2021
quotequote all
blitzracing said:
A Q7 at that speed has the same kinetic energy as a small H bomb methinks, and in the hands of a woman who no doubt needs such ridiculous bulk its to look after fragile little Jonny on the school run?
You ARE the Daily Fail aren’t you?

OverSteery

3,794 posts

260 months

Thursday 20th May 2021
quotequote all
blitzracing said:
A Q7 at that speed has the same kinetic energy as a small H bomb methinks, and in the hands of a woman who no doubt needs such ridiculous bulk its to look after fragile little Jonny on the school run?
Indeed, outrageous they should sell such a machine to a "little woman" - well built company directors only should be allowed whilst on important business.

Her name looks a bit foreign - would you like to throw in some casual racism too?


Edited by OverSteery on Thursday 20th May 17:22

Heaveho

Original Poster:

7,448 posts

203 months

Thursday 20th May 2021
quotequote all
normalbloke said:
blitzracing said:
A Q7 at that speed has the same kinetic energy as a small H bomb methinks, and in the hands of a woman who no doubt needs such ridiculous bulk its to look after fragile little Jonny on the school run?
You ARE the Daily Fail aren’t you?
Hmm, as headlines go, it's reaching a bit.

I'm not a fan of that type of vehicle in any way, shape or form, but the amount of assumptions, guesswork and lack of facts in that post puts me on her side, not yours.

Pica-Pica

16,569 posts

113 months

Thursday 20th May 2021
quotequote all
OverSteery said:
blitzracing said:
A Q7 at that speed has the same kinetic energy as a small H bomb methinks, and in the hands of a woman who no doubt needs such ridiculous bulk its to look after fragile little Jonny on the school run?
Indeed, outrageous they should sell such a machine to a "little woman" - well built company directors only should be allowed whilst on important business
Who says she isn’t a powerfully built company director on important business?

Sir Bagalot

7,088 posts

210 months

Thursday 20th May 2021
quotequote all
Bit silly considering she was doing an easy indicated 110 and she should know that part of the M3 has more than its fair share of unmarked police

Oilchange

9,702 posts

289 months

Thursday 20th May 2021
quotequote all
Pica-Pica said:
Who says she isn’t a powerfully built company director on important business?
Indeed she might actually be massive

AJL308

6,390 posts

185 months

Thursday 20th May 2021
quotequote all
OverSteery said:
blitzracing said:
A Q7 at that speed has the same kinetic energy as a small H bomb methinks, and in the hands of a woman who no doubt needs such ridiculous bulk its to look after fragile little Jonny on the school run?
Indeed, outrageous they should sell such a machine to a "little woman" - well built company directors only should be allowed whilst on important business.

Her name looks a bit foreign - would you like to throw in some casual racism too?


Edited by OverSteery on Thursday 20th May 17:22
Sounds Romanian. She'll be generously providing cheap accommodation and "employment opportunities" to many of her younger countrywomen, then.

agtlaw

7,397 posts

235 months

Thursday 20th May 2021
quotequote all
ScoobyChris said:
Band C fine I think which is starting point 150% net weekly income, capped at £2500 for motorway offences.

Chris
She pleaded guilty. 100% of net weekly income would be the expected outcome.

92% of the maximum is wrong in principle for an early guilty plea and would almost certainly be reduced on appeal.

Derek Smith

49,740 posts

277 months

Thursday 20th May 2021
quotequote all
agtlaw said:
She pleaded guilty. 100% of net weekly income would be the expected outcome.

92% of the maximum is wrong in principle for an early guilty plea and would almost certainly be reduced on appeal.
Doesn't say early. Doesn't mention any aggravating factors, whether present or not. I'm sure their worships, with the clerk's assistance, had their reasons.

agtlaw

7,397 posts

235 months

Thursday 20th May 2021
quotequote all
Derek Smith said:
Doesn't say early.
Wrong.

£90 prosecution costs = early guilty plea.

Heaveho

Original Poster:

7,448 posts

203 months

Thursday 20th May 2021
quotequote all
agtlaw said:
Derek Smith said:
Doesn't say early.
Wrong.

£90 prosecution costs = early guilty plea.
st, you're good! laugh

carinaman

25,167 posts

201 months

Friday 21st May 2021
quotequote all
Article says A7 not Q7.

poo at Paul's

14,609 posts

204 months

Friday 21st May 2021
quotequote all
My dad got a fine of £1,000 for speeding at 103mph on a dual cariageway.........in his brand new Company (bright yellow!) Calibra!
What was that, 1993 or so....? Lot of money in them days and he wasn't a wealthy chap, hence the Company Calibra!