79 in a 70, SAC?
Discussion
As I understand they should be fine for a SAC; as long as they've not attended a SAC in the last three years, own up to being the driver within a certain time limit (42 days I believe? maybe check that) and their speed is within the threshold for SAC which is the speed limit + 10% + 9mph, so 86mph.
slipknotted said:
As I understand they should be fine for a SAC; as long as they've not attended a SAC in the last three years, own up to being the driver within a certain time limit (42 days I believe? maybe check that) and their speed is within the threshold for SAC which is the speed limit + 10% + 9mph, so 86mph.
Pretty much all criteria for a SAC. Slightly annoying, as presumably enforcement starts at 79, but then again it's happened and she will have to take it on the chin. First one in 9 years. 
livinginasia said:
My goodness.... an NIP for 79 miles an hour on the motorway......what has this country come to !?!
I know "brake" members will be along soon to say she should be hung, drawn and quartered, but really, this is nonsense.
Hopefully she will get a SAC. Best of luck.
My thoughts exactly really. I'll be honest, I was in the car with her and we saw the van, glanced at the speedometer for an indicated 80 mph or so. Wasn't really concerned at that. I do wonder if seeing it a little late and in reality she may have slowed from an indicated 85 or so. Which is very odd as she rarely pushes beyond 80 (evidenced by lack of NIPs over the course of 9 years.) I know "brake" members will be along soon to say she should be hung, drawn and quartered, but really, this is nonsense.
Hopefully she will get a SAC. Best of luck.
Far from the crime of the century, but I guess North Yorkshire constabulary weren't happy with it.
bad company said:
Should be good for an SAC but you might not want to insure with Admiral as they ask if you’ve attended a course.
A few years ago had to phone admiral to advise I had been on a course, nice lady said it will make no difference to the cost, they just like to know. Not sure if its the same now.Jimmy No Hands said:
Far from the crime of the century, but I guess North Yorkshire constabulary weren't happy with it.
On the contrary, they'd be very happy. Likely it is more fodder for a speed awareness course, keeping all the ex-cops in beer money.It's pretty binary - 78MPH is OK, action starts at 79..
Jimmy No Hands said:
North Yorkshire constabulary
Say no more! I got caught with my pants down at 89 a couple of years ago on the A168. The literature I had implied they will offer a speed awareness course for 79-86 - they generate revenue from commission doing that rather than the fine going to the treasury. NYP is quite proud of this fact.geordiepingu said:
Say no more! I got caught with my pants down at 89 a couple of years ago on the A168. The literature I had implied they will offer a speed awareness course for 79-86 - they generate revenue from commission doing that rather than the fine going to the treasury. NYP is quite proud of this fact.
Reassuring then I suppose. I will update in due course!BertBert said:
bad company said:
Should be good for an SAC but you might not want to insure with Admiral as they ask if you’ve attended a course.
Keep up. Admiral don't ask and haven't for several years as we've previously discussed.Forums | Speed, Plod & the Law | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff


