Banned company director caught drink driving Porsche
Banned company director caught drink driving Porsche
Author
Discussion

LunarOne

Original Poster:

7,314 posts

166 months

Wednesday 22nd September 2021
quotequote all
https://www.yorkpress.co.uk/news/19594404.banned-c...

This popped up on my newsfeed on my phone and I realise it's barely newsworthy. I don't know why he was banned in the first place, but the article says that he holds multiple directorships. It got me wondering. I can't contemplate not being able to drive as the demands of my life mean it's very difficult to plan ahead. But I'm currently self employed in IT and work mostly from home with the occasional site visit required. But how exactly are you supposed to run a business (let alone multiple) if you aren't allowed to drive? I would imagine that most businesses which employ people will require regular directors to attend meetings and events here and there and that would be very difficult without being able to drive. How do people who don't drive manage to run businesses? The mind boggles!

It wouldn't surprise me if said Macan-driving company director is on PH. So tell us - how will you manage?

aparna

1,156 posts

66 months

Wednesday 22nd September 2021
quotequote all
I would have thought having a family is a bigger reason to 'really' need a car, versus being a company director?

Depends on the sector, I guess.

GreatGranny

9,519 posts

255 months

Wednesday 22nd September 2021
quotequote all
Firstly he's an idiot and deserves the long ban and fines that he got.

If he really needs to get around the country then he would have to bite the bullet and hire a driver.


LM240

5,659 posts

247 months

Wednesday 22nd September 2021
quotequote all
Already a disqualified driver and not only drives but is also a disgusting amount over the limit. To actually get above 100ugs is not something you do and then think you’ll be fine to drive.

Without doubt it won’t be the first time he’s either driven or drink-drived since disqualified.

Shame fine and ban not bigger/longer. In fact having ignored the ban and also driven over the limit, shame he didn’t have a bit of prison time.

Hate drink drivers. Going back to original poster, absolutely no sympathy for any transport problems.

Psycho Warren

3,087 posts

142 months

Wednesday 22nd September 2021
quotequote all
Hire a driver or work from home. Not really rocket science. Although someone who has "multiple companies" should be intelligent enough to not drink drive. But they could all be sham companies for all we know.

andburg

8,729 posts

198 months

Wednesday 22nd September 2021
quotequote all
digging in he's on board of directors for the school and responsible for Health and Safety

Hope he's standing down......

PistonBroker

2,715 posts

255 months

Wednesday 22nd September 2021
quotequote all
For clarity, I'm not planning on joining him!

But if the pandemic has proven anything, I could definitely run this business without being able to drive.

Client meetings I usually went to got moved to Facetime, Zoom and Teams and I still did the business. Now I'm back out meeting people, it would be a nightmare at times to get about but, if I absolutely had to, I could rely on trains, taxis etc. Or just have Mrs PB drive me about - she works with me anyway.

The bigger issue would probably be having to explain why I couldn't go to a meeting. A drink-driving banned insurance broker doesn't sound ideal!

anonymous-user

83 months

Wednesday 22nd September 2021
quotequote all
Only missing the price of his house and the article is Daily Wail ready.

nxi20

786 posts

234 months

Wednesday 22nd September 2021
quotequote all
To answer the OP's question, I suspect it's very much dependant on where you live.

A good friend has never learned to drive and yet has successfully owned & run multi-million pound companies for the last 40 years. He's been based in London & New York and (probably rightly) maintains that being able to drive in either city is of no practical benefit. On the other hand he's always had a wife with a car wink

Sheepshanks

40,970 posts

148 months

Wednesday 22nd September 2021
quotequote all
nxi20 said:
To answer the OP's question, I suspect it's very much dependant on where you live.
Friend of mine - late 30's - had his licence removed out-of-the-blue for medical reasons and it took several years to get it back. He was a sales manager and had to move house to be near the office and a station and just generally had a nightmare getting around.

LunarOne

Original Poster:

7,314 posts

166 months

Wednesday 22nd September 2021
quotequote all
LM240 said:
Without doubt it won’t be the first time he’s either driven or drink-drived since disqualified..
I concur. I’m absolutely sure he’s been getting away with it for a while and he’s probably surprised he’s been caught. As for also drink-driving, he probably thought it wouldn’t make things worse if he were caught again. He was nearly right as he got off pretty lightly in my opinion!

Franco5

506 posts

88 months

Wednesday 22nd September 2021
quotequote all
LunarOne said:
I concur. I’m absolutely sure he’s been getting away with it for a while and he’s probably surprised he’s been caught. As for also drink-driving, he probably thought it wouldn’t make things worse if he were caught again. He was nearly right as he got off pretty lightly in my opinion!
Not defending him but it may be that the guy has psychological problems that mean he’s dependent on alcohol. Its surprising the number of people that are unable to function without regular substance use e.g. a bottle of wine every night after work seems insignificant but it makes their lives manageable. They are often caught as repeat offenders as it’s the only way they can survive.

Terminator X

20,543 posts

233 months

Wednesday 22nd September 2021
quotequote all
Bus. Train. Taxi. Uber.

No?

TX.

anonymous-user

83 months

Wednesday 22nd September 2021
quotequote all
Franco5 said:
Not defending him but it may be that the guy has psychological problems that mean he’s dependent on alcohol. .
Makes no difference really. As in a car is a tool to kill in the wrong hands, no excuses really, If he is dependent then he shouldn't drive.


Pip1968

1,395 posts

233 months

Thursday 23rd September 2021
quotequote all
Unless you are living in the middle of butt f*ck nowhere I don't see the problem - and even then !! There are plenty of things to hinder you more in life than not being able to drive (disabled children, missing limb, blindness, living on the breadline). Just look at the number of young people that don't drive now. It used to be a given to learn to drive at 17 but now.........

If being a Company Director and not being able to drive is your biggest worry I would suggest that 'you' are either very young or lead a pampered life. Travel to a third world country and you will see people that overcome 'real' issues in order to work and live.

Pip

Dave Hedgehog

16,317 posts

233 months

Thursday 23rd September 2021
quotequote all
GreatGranny said:
Firstly he's an idiot and deserves the long ban and fines that he got.

If he really needs to get around the country then he would have to bite the bullet and hire a driver.
he should get 12 months for blatantly taking the piss out of the courts

Triumph Man

9,580 posts

197 months

Thursday 23rd September 2021
quotequote all
Wonder what his username on here is?

mat205125

17,790 posts

242 months

Thursday 23rd September 2021
quotequote all
Never get the logic of pleading your job title as a defence. If you know the criticallity of your licence to fulfil your job, then you don't drink and drive, or drive whilst banned.

Sounds like a bullst job title hes given himself for his own business, to claim a salary whilst someone else does the hard work ..... good swing once you get there, however irresponsible to try and use it as an excuse to get leniency

Bet his wife is the financial director, as she sorts his receipts into a spreadsheet

LunarOne

Original Poster:

7,314 posts

166 months

Thursday 23rd September 2021
quotequote all
mat205125 said:
Never get the logic of pleading your job title as a defence. If you know the criticallity of your licence to fulfil your job, then you don't drink and drive, or drive whilst banned.

Sounds like a bullst job title hes given himself for his own business, to claim a salary whilst someone else does the hard work ..... good swing once you get there, however irresponsible to try and use it as an excuse to get leniency
I don't believe there's any suggestion that he's used directorship to try to get out of his sentence. The news outlet will have added that to flesh out their article. But company director isn't a job title he's given himself. It's a legal position you are given when you form a company. You can resign from the directorship of a company, but without a director a company cannot exist.

I'm aware of the case of a gym I used to visit for personal training. The director sadly passed away after suffering cancer, and the gym had to close. Customers were not even allowed to access the gym to retrieve personal property as with no director, the premises were not allowed to open due to public liability, arguments over who owned what... It was a sorry mess that took time to resolve.

over_the_hill

3,330 posts

275 months

Thursday 23rd September 2021
quotequote all
As the OP notes we don't know why he was banned in the first place. But if it was a "standard" 56 day ban for
too much right foot, then he could easily have worked around that. So quite possibly longer for a more serious
offence or totting up.

Pip1968 said:
Unless you are living in the middle of butt f*ck nowhere I don't see the problem - and even then !! There are plenty of things to hinder you more in life than not being able to drive (disabled children, missing limb, blindness, living on the breadline). Just look at the number of young people that don't drive now. It used to be a given to learn to drive at 17 but now.........
Pip
A few years ago I was watching an episode of Eggheads. The viewer team consisted of four youngish early 20s lads who
all seemed quite bright so presumably had at least half-decent jobs. A motoring law question came up and they could not
answer it. Reason - none of them could drive.