Colin Pitchfork
Discussion
Colin Pitchfork the evil double murderer and rapist only released two months ago despite public uproar and legal challenge by the government...
has breached his licence conditions and been returned to prison.
The Parole Board and it's so called experts proving yet again they're unfit for purpose or at least so aloof that they can't be challenged.
Once again egg on their face.
At least he's back where he should be.
I wonder if the Parole Board will issue a public response.
If so it will be the usual dross.....
We have to act within the law....experts advised us he could be managed outside etc etc.
What about using a nit of good old common sense.
has breached his licence conditions and been returned to prison.
The Parole Board and it's so called experts proving yet again they're unfit for purpose or at least so aloof that they can't be challenged.
Once again egg on their face.
At least he's back where he should be.
I wonder if the Parole Board will issue a public response.
If so it will be the usual dross.....
We have to act within the law....experts advised us he could be managed outside etc etc.
What about using a nit of good old common sense.
I don't take any drugs thank you.
He breached his licence conditions full stop.
I'm not concerned about the details unlike yourself.
I'm more interested in the fact a dangerous offender who should never have been released is back inside.
Extrapolate what you wish from that. If you think it's a bit harsh and need further details before forming an opinion good luck with that.
Unlike yourself I doubt the families of his two victims are particularly bothered about the details of his breach.
It was enough to get him lifted and back to prison so it's happy days.
He breached his licence conditions full stop.
I'm not concerned about the details unlike yourself.
I'm more interested in the fact a dangerous offender who should never have been released is back inside.
Extrapolate what you wish from that. If you think it's a bit harsh and need further details before forming an opinion good luck with that.
Unlike yourself I doubt the families of his two victims are particularly bothered about the details of his breach.
It was enough to get him lifted and back to prison so it's happy days.
You would think that by your age, assuming your username is related, you would have learned:
A) how the justice system works in the U.K.; and
B) to know the limitations of your own knowledge on a subject and realise that possibly the people making certain decisions are privy to more information than you.
But there we go.
A) how the justice system works in the U.K.; and
B) to know the limitations of your own knowledge on a subject and realise that possibly the people making certain decisions are privy to more information than you.
But there we go.
Dingu.
You make far too many assumptions.
You have no idea how old I am.
Not that that is irrelevant.
It's obvious you have little knowledge of the justice system.
Just for your information he doesn't have to commit an offence to breach the terms of his licence.
I have actually obtained details from the Parole Board of the decision making process regarding this dangerous individual.
Something that you obviously haven't.
Obviously there may be information I am not privy to.
However irrespective of what information they may have had their collective decision was obviously wrong.
He's only been out two months.
If you support these crass decisions made by the Parole Board and prefer the likes of Pitchfork to be free to integrate in society that's fine.
If he is ever released again perhaps you could accommodate him or at least have him housed near you.
Your inferior knowledge of the justice should be able to allow that to happen.
You make far too many assumptions.
You have no idea how old I am.
Not that that is irrelevant.
It's obvious you have little knowledge of the justice system.
Just for your information he doesn't have to commit an offence to breach the terms of his licence.
I have actually obtained details from the Parole Board of the decision making process regarding this dangerous individual.
Something that you obviously haven't.
Obviously there may be information I am not privy to.
However irrespective of what information they may have had their collective decision was obviously wrong.
He's only been out two months.
If you support these crass decisions made by the Parole Board and prefer the likes of Pitchfork to be free to integrate in society that's fine.
If he is ever released again perhaps you could accommodate him or at least have him housed near you.
Your inferior knowledge of the justice should be able to allow that to happen.
Volvo1956 said:
I'm more interested in the fact a dangerous offender who should never have been released is back inside.
I don't know the ins and outs of this case. But what I see a lot is people saying "life should mean life" and "so and so should never be released", but they aren't the ones running the prison or trying to manage prisoners. It's a tough job at the best of times, but removing the possibility of parole, or reduced time for good behaviour, makes the job far more difficult. However, if Volvo1956 comes back to confirm he's a prison officer working with those who committed very serious offences, but he still believes there should be no hope of parole, and he's happy to deal with the behavioural deterioration of those in his charge as a result of that stance, I will of course apologise.
Dingu.
For your information he has been approaching young females whilst out on long walks.
He was approaching females when he was out on day release but the Parole Board chose to ignore this.
It would appear the system has worked but it's a shame it needed to be tested.
I trust you agree he should be back inside but no doubt he'll be out again when the system gets to work.
For your information he has been approaching young females whilst out on long walks.
He was approaching females when he was out on day release but the Parole Board chose to ignore this.
It would appear the system has worked but it's a shame it needed to be tested.
I trust you agree he should be back inside but no doubt he'll be out again when the system gets to work.
TwigtheWonderkid said:
I don't know the ins and outs of this case. But what I see a lot is people saying "life should mean life" and "so and so should never be released", but they aren't the ones running the prison or trying to manage prisoners. It's a tough job at the best of times, but removing the possibility of parole, or reduced time for good behaviour, makes the job far more difficult.
However, if Volvo1956 comes back to confirm he's a prison officer working with those who committed very serious offences, but he still believes there should be no hope of parole, and he's happy to deal with the behavioural deterioration of those in his charge as a result of that stance, I will of course apologise.
Good grief no I'm not a prison officer how on earth did you reach that conclusion.However, if Volvo1956 comes back to confirm he's a prison officer working with those who committed very serious offences, but he still believes there should be no hope of parole, and he's happy to deal with the behavioural deterioration of those in his charge as a result of that stance, I will of course apologise.
The prison system seems to manage whole lifers quite well.
Robert Mawdesley deemed so dangerous he has his own glass cell deep in the bowels of Wakefield Prison.
Are you advocating no life sentences and release them all.
If the prison system can't cope then it needs to change.
If prison staff can't cope then they joined the wrong job.
What exactly do you suggest happens to dangerous evil offenders.
I don't think you're argument would go down well with the families of victims murdered by convicted murderers released on licence.
Society has been failed if we can't keep dangerous offenders locked up.
TwigtheWonderkid said:
Volvo1956 said:
I'm more interested in the fact a dangerous offender who should never have been released is back inside.
I don't know the ins and outs of this case. But what I see a lot is people saying "life should mean life" and "so and so should never be released", but they aren't the ones running the prison or trying to manage prisoners. It's a tough job at the best of times, but removing the possibility of parole, or reduced time for good behaviour, makes the job far more difficult. However, if Volvo1956 comes back to confirm he's a prison officer working with those who committed very serious offences, but he still believes there should be no hope of parole, and he's happy to deal with the behavioural deterioration of those in his charge as a result of that stance, I will of course apologise.
He is probably one of the criminals where a full life term is appropriate.
Dingu said:
You would think that by your age, assuming your username is related, you would have learned:
A) how the justice system works in the U.K.; and
B) to know the limitations of your own knowledge on a subject and realise that possibly the people making certain decisions are privy to more information than you.
But there we go.
You've been here a month, you might want to ask your mum if it's OK to be using the interwebs.A) how the justice system works in the U.K.; and
B) to know the limitations of your own knowledge on a subject and realise that possibly the people making certain decisions are privy to more information than you.
But there we go.
Forums | Speed, Plod & the Law | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff