Sneaky Council PCN Fine - No Right Turn...
Sneaky Council PCN Fine - No Right Turn...
Author
Discussion

hyphen

Original Poster:

26,262 posts

119 months

Monday 7th February 2022
quotequote all
smile So there were roadworks on a main road in London and I ended up going through some random side road. A month later a 'give us £65' for a no right turn pops through the post. So I street view it, as I wouldn't go through one intentionally.

And what has happened is as per pic. Instead of a sign on left side of the road, or ahead where the driver would normally be looking for one, the sneaky sods have instead put a sign on right hand side. So I approached the junction, no signs where they would normally be expected, busy scanning for pedestrians and a gap in traffic and went on my merry way.

I am sure it's lawful positioning, but also unusual... in amongst any replies of "serves you right pay up" that I fully expect on here biggrin anyone agree that this is sneaky! There appears to be no reason for the sign to be that side, as the pavements on each side are identical.

Is this a new thing? Signs on the other side.



That long pole you can see up ahead is the one with the camera on it.



Edited by hyphen on Monday 7th February 20:27

anonymous-user

83 months

Monday 7th February 2022
quotequote all
Apparently they can be placed on the right hand side if they think a sign on the left hand side could be obscured by vehicles, 4.5.3.

https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/governmen...

hyphen

Original Poster:

26,262 posts

119 months

Monday 7th February 2022
quotequote all
Thanks, I will be challenging it so will read up on that. As don't see how it could be obscured on the left.

Will file a Freedom Of Info thingy to see how many have got caught at this location too.

paintman

7,860 posts

219 months

Monday 7th February 2022
quotequote all
Isn't there also something about reducing the environmental impact by reducing the number of road signs?
E.G No longer any requirement for speed limit signs to be both sides of the road, one will do.
Perhaps something else for you to look into.

2 sMoKiN bArReLs

32,006 posts

264 months

Monday 7th February 2022
quotequote all
Easy with knowledge...

....but notwithstanding the sign the position of the central bollards & road markings would make me think twice about turning right.

But, that's armed with the knowledge we now have (probably)

vaud

59,358 posts

184 months

Monday 7th February 2022
quotequote all
I see your point, but wouldn't you be looking right anyway for traffic / pedestrians?

FWIW

3,924 posts

126 months

Monday 7th February 2022
quotequote all
Agreed, it’s sneaky.

2 sMoKiN bArReLs said:
the position of the central bollards & road markings would make me think twice about turning right.
Why? Just because you now know someone was fined?


anonymous-user

83 months

Monday 7th February 2022
quotequote all
hyphen said:
Thanks, I will be challenging it so will read up on that. As don't see how it could be obscured on the left.

Will file a Freedom Of Info thingy to see how many have got caught at this location too.
That's probably the right document but the example suggests when there are two approach lanes, which there aren't, so that specific reasoning doesn't apply. I'm not sure you'll find a 'signs must be on the left except when x y z' though.

hyphen

Original Poster:

26,262 posts

119 months

Monday 7th February 2022
quotequote all
vaud said:
I see your point, but wouldn't you be looking right anyway for traffic / pedestrians?
As per pic from otherside, it's a big wide junction. So will have seen those easily.



2 sMoKiN bArReLs

32,006 posts

264 months

Monday 7th February 2022
quotequote all
FWIW said:
Agreed, it’s sneaky.

2 sMoKiN bArReLs said:
the position of the central bollards & road markings would make me think twice about turning right.
Why? Just because you now know someone was fined?
As I said, maybe because we know. But, it's a tight right turn. That often indicates that you shouldn't do it.


anonymous-user

83 months

Monday 7th February 2022
quotequote all
hyphen said:
As per pic from otherside, it's a big wide junction. So will have seen those easily.

Interesting that there's also a no left turn from that direction - is there a no-right turn coming from the other direction too? I can't see if there's one there but I'd expect there to be a narrow 'right turn' arrow in the hatched area if there was. The hatched area might be another indication that there's no right turn from that side road, i.e. you'd have to drive straight across them, but I don't know the guidelines on hatched areas.

FWIW

3,924 posts

126 months

Monday 7th February 2022
quotequote all
2 sMoKiN bArReLs said:
But, it's a tight right turn.
No, it really isn’t.

vaud

59,358 posts

184 months

Monday 7th February 2022
quotequote all
FWIW said:
2 sMoKiN bArReLs said:
But, it's a tight right turn.
No, it really isn’t.
I agree. Given the no left turn and no right turn, is it to reduce a rat run?

FWIW

3,924 posts

126 months

Monday 7th February 2022
quotequote all
Erm, is this the same junction?


TonyF1

236 posts

81 months

Monday 7th February 2022
quotequote all
I was about to say it seems strange no road marking to indicate left only but doesn’t seem worth asking now. Good luck with the appeal.

Riley Blue

23,205 posts

255 months

Tuesday 8th February 2022
quotequote all
FWIW said:
Erm, is this the same junction?

Looks like it, the Thetford Road / MaldenRoad (A2043) junction.

Solocle

4,196 posts

113 months

Tuesday 8th February 2022
quotequote all
What I don't get with signs only on the right hand side is this one -

Good luck seeing that if you're cycling there! Mr Fed Ex would probably be in the way...

2 sMoKiN bArReLs

32,006 posts

264 months

Tuesday 8th February 2022
quotequote all
vaud said:
FWIW said:
2 sMoKiN bArReLs said:
But, it's a tight right turn.
No, it really isn’t.
I agree. Given the no left turn and no right turn, is it to reduce a rat run?
Looks less tight from the main road I agree.

mmm-five

12,330 posts

313 months

Tuesday 8th February 2022
quotequote all
Solocle said:
What I don't get with signs only on the right hand side is this one -

Good luck seeing that if you're cycling there! Mr Fed Ex would probably be in the way...
No he wouldn't because the cyclist would either be in the middle of the lane in front or behind the truck, not to the side rolleyes

Although I'm not sure why Mr Cyclist would even be on that part of the road, as all the approach roads (the A206 and the A282) have signs telling them that the Dartford tunnel was approaching and that pedestrians & cyclists were prohibited.

Don't pedestrians & cyclists have to stop at the nearby lay-by and get a lift across?



Edited by mmm-five on Tuesday 8th February 09:38

Solocle

4,196 posts

113 months

Tuesday 8th February 2022
quotequote all
mmm-five said:
No he wouldn't because the cyclist would either be in the middle of the lane in front or behind the truck, not to the side rolleyes

Although I'm not sure why Mr Cyclist would even be on that part of the road, as all the approach roads (the A206 and the A282) have signs telling them that the Dartford tunnel was approaching and that pedestrians & cyclists were prohibited.

Don't pedestrians & cyclists have to stop at the nearby lay-by and get a lift across?



Edited by mmm-five on Tuesday 8th February 09:38
Not all the approach roads. Try the A296 or the A2. And no signs to leave at the A206 junction.



Plus I presume The Fed Ex would be moving to lane 2 to overtake.

Edited by Solocle on Tuesday 8th February 09:50