Disabled bay markings
Discussion
I parked in a disabled bay by mistake and got a ticket, there was nothing painted on the road to indicate it disabled purely a sign with a little disabled notice approx 7ft high. It was on street parking and only disabled bay. Does it have to be marked on the road as disabled to be enforceable or is the small sign enough?
Thanks
Thanks
OP, post a pic (or Google Street view) of where it happened.
The responses could be a useful barometer of whether or not it's worth appealing; if a significant number of people say "well that's not adequately signed, what a swizz" it might be worth it. If you face a barrage of "How did you miss that? I didn't think blind people were allowed to drive" then you know it isn't.
The responses could be a useful barometer of whether or not it's worth appealing; if a significant number of people say "well that's not adequately signed, what a swizz" it might be worth it. If you face a barrage of "How did you miss that? I didn't think blind people were allowed to drive" then you know it isn't.
essexd said:
Small sign is all that's needed, anything painted on the road is advisory.
AFAIK signs show the conditions of parking e.g. duration, return times, days of week, disabled etc. etc. I see cars being ticketed several times a week after drivers fail to look at the signs and assume a parking bay on the road means 'forever', 'anytime you like', 'drive round the block and park again'.These kinds of things really annoy me. It shouldn’t take effort to NOT break the law. When you have massively over complex clean air zones, stupid amounts of signage that are impossible to read whilst driving and watching out for the next kamikaze pedestrian or cyclist who are now "empowered" to do whatever they want. It makes staying within the law and not getting fined really quite difficult. Especially if you are not from the area.
Riley Blue said:
Suggest you hit 'preview' before you hit 'submit' 'cos that's ridiculous.
The opposite of his statement would be that it should be a continuous, massive inconvenience to everybody, to lead normal everyday lives without constant fear that some detail of what they're doing could be illegal. Are you honestly telling us that's the way you view the world?markjmd said:
Riley Blue said:
Suggest you hit 'preview' before you hit 'submit' 'cos that's ridiculous.
The opposite of his statement would be that it should be a continuous, massive inconvenience to everybody, to lead normal everyday lives without constant fear that some detail of what they're doing could be illegal. Are you honestly telling us that's the way you view the world?Pica-Pica said:
markjmd said:
Riley Blue said:
Suggest you hit 'preview' before you hit 'submit' 'cos that's ridiculous.
The opposite of his statement would be that it should be a continuous, massive inconvenience to everybody, to lead normal everyday lives without constant fear that some detail of what they're doing could be illegal. Are you honestly telling us that's the way you view the world?Forums | Speed, Plod & the Law | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff



