Company owns car, driver avoids prosecution
Discussion
So Cyclingmikey sends video of Lambo driver using phone to the police and the driver gets away with it as the company that owns the car fails to identify the driver to the police. Company gets fined £1,000, driver no points, no fine.
Doesn't seem fair does it?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cSk3Xfcn7lA
Doesn't seem fair does it?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cSk3Xfcn7lA
Oceanrower said:
I absolutely do not condone the actions of the Lambo driver but anything that pisses off that sanctimonious prick is fine by me!
Amazing that he did seem to miss the cyclist who went by at the end of the clip, no hands on the handlebar AND using his phone. But he rarely stops cyclists.pocketspring said:
Yep plenty of cyclists pass him at Gandalf's corner yet he does zilch about them.
How do you propose he stops and identifies the miscreant cyclists that are responsible for the deaths of and injuries to so many people?To clarify - I'm not a huge fan of CM and think he's a tad nuts, just calling out the usual false equivalence between people on 5-20kg push bikes vs those in control of powered machines weighing tonnes.
VSKeith said:
pocketspring said:
Yep plenty of cyclists pass him at Gandalf's corner yet he does zilch about them.
How do you propose he stops and identifies the miscreant cyclists that are responsible for the deaths of and injuries to so many people?To clarify - I'm not a huge fan of CM and think he's a tad nuts, just calling out the usual false equivalence between people on 5-20kg push bikes vs those in control of powered machines weighing tonnes.
pocketspring said:
VSKeith said:
pocketspring said:
Yep plenty of cyclists pass him at Gandalf's corner yet he does zilch about them.
How do you propose he stops and identifies the miscreant cyclists that are responsible for the deaths of and injuries to so many people?To clarify - I'm not a huge fan of CM and think he's a tad nuts, just calling out the usual false equivalence between people on 5-20kg push bikes vs those in control of powered machines weighing tonnes.
He blocks the progress of the cars, not difficult.
Stopping a cyclist, without physically restraining them is far more difficult, catching and stopping one that's sped past you even more so.
These are the practical challenges.
My main point is the usual false equivalence made between people on push bikes and cars.
loskie said:
I was thinking the other day (unusual I know) but is there anything to stop a person who cannot drive being the registered keeper of a car? Thus many penalties will not have an effect on them should they not disclose who the driver is.
Except after a receiving a few thousand pound fines they may start to think that maybe it's not such good idea after allVSKeith said:
The drivers are reported as they have numberplates, and most are identified.
He blocks the progress of the cars, not difficult.
Stopping a cyclist, without physically restraining them is far more difficult, catching and stopping one that's sped past you even more so.
These are the practical challenges.
My main point is the usual false equivalence made between people on push bikes and cars.
Why would you physically restrain a cyclist when all you have to do is step out in front of one and tell them what they're doing wrong? Not difficult, in fact it should be even easier than a car! You seem to think it's fine for a cyclist to break the laws of the road. Or are you for cyclists to have reg numbers on their bikes? Or are you in the "that's not practical" group nonsense? He blocks the progress of the cars, not difficult.
Stopping a cyclist, without physically restraining them is far more difficult, catching and stopping one that's sped past you even more so.
These are the practical challenges.
My main point is the usual false equivalence made between people on push bikes and cars.
pocketspring said:
Who said about identifying them? If he's quite happy to stand in front of a car and tell them error of their ways then he should be even more happy doing it to cyclists.
There's nothing to stop a motorist from spending his days stopping errant cyclists, if he feels so inclined.QJumper said:
pocketspring said:
Who said about identifying them? If he's quite happy to stand in front of a car and tell them error of their ways then he should be even more happy doing it to cyclists.
There's nothing to stop a motorist from spending his days stopping errant cyclists, if he feels so inclined.Forums | Speed, Plod & the Law | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff


