25=jailtime insanity
Author
Discussion

Ohio7274

Original Poster:

249 posts

41 months

Friday 12th May 2023
quotequote all
You know things are seriously getting out of hand when the archbishop ends up with 3 points and a £500 fine for 25 mph !!

https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-london-6557225...

bobtail4x4

4,399 posts

138 months

Friday 12th May 2023
quotequote all
on the same day he has a pop at the government??

Bobtherallyfan

1,513 posts

107 months

Friday 12th May 2023
quotequote all
25% over the speed limit.

Raccaccoonie

2,797 posts

48 months

Friday 12th May 2023
quotequote all
private magistrates' court hearing, fancy.

jeremyc

28,061 posts

313 months

Friday 12th May 2023
quotequote all
BBC article said:
The spokesperson said: "He has tried to resolve this and pay the fine three times. He has all the paperwork to prove that he has tried to pay.

"Admin errors seem to be causing problems."
So he's failed to pay the fine in the normal way and therefore been subject to higher fines because it had to be taken to court.

Presumably otherwise it would have been £100 and the three points, and no need for any hysteria.

Blib

48,030 posts

226 months

Friday 12th May 2023
quotequote all
Bobtherallyfan said:
25% over the speed limit.
The speed crazed lunatic!

rowley birkin

513 posts

129 months

Friday 12th May 2023
quotequote all
Blib said:
The speed crazed lunatic!
Please don't bash the bishop...

PastelNata

4,419 posts

229 months

Friday 12th May 2023
quotequote all
Sinner! Needs to go straight to Hell!

muppets_mate

834 posts

245 months

Friday 12th May 2023
quotequote all
rowley birkin said:
Please don't bash the bishop...
snigger

hehe



agtlaw

7,387 posts

235 months

Friday 12th May 2023
quotequote all
jeremyc said:
So he's failed to pay the fine in the normal way and therefore been subject to higher fines because it had to be taken to court.

Presumably otherwise it would have been £100 and the three points, and no need for any hysteria.
Failed to pay a fixed penalty.

Therefore, court proceedings were instituted via the Single Justice Procedure and he was then fined. Presumably also ordered to pay costs and a victim surcharge.

The BBC article includes some nonsense about pleading guilty online on Wednesday. That's obviously incorrect. There is absolutely no chance his case was dealt with the on the same day he entered his plea. That simply does not happen.

Blib

48,030 posts

226 months

Friday 12th May 2023
quotequote all
agtlaw said:
jeremyc said:
So he's failed to pay the fine in the normal way and therefore been subject to higher fines because it had to be taken to court.

Presumably otherwise it would have been £100 and the three points, and no need for any hysteria.
Failed to pay a fixed penalty.

Therefore, court proceedings were instituted via the Single Justice Procedure and he was then fined. Presumably also ordered to pay costs and a victim surcharge.

The BBC article includes some nonsense about pleading guilty online on Wednesday. That's obviously incorrect. There is absolutely no chance his case was dealt with the on the same day he entered his plea. That simply does not happen.
yikes

Are you suggesting that the CofE are being economical with the truth?

Oceanrower

1,346 posts

141 months

Friday 12th May 2023
quotequote all
Blib said:
yikes

Are you suggesting that the CofE are being economical with the truth?
That would be an ecumenical matter…

agtlaw

7,387 posts

235 months

Friday 12th May 2023
quotequote all
Blib said:
yikes

Are you suggesting that the CofE are being economical with the truth?
Poor BBC journalism. They assumed because his case was dealt with online, that the court dealt with it immediately. It was dealt with on Wednesday. His plea was entered at least 7 days previously and probably longer ago than that. The index offence was more than 6m ago.

Aretnap

1,966 posts

180 months

Friday 12th May 2023
quotequote all
Raccaccoonie said:
private magistrates' court hearing, fancy.
Otherwise known as single justice procedure; used in the large majority of speeding cases (and other minor motoring offences) and not at all or of the ordinary.

Tony1963

5,808 posts

191 months

Friday 12th May 2023
quotequote all
Putting the canter into Canterbury

agtlaw

7,387 posts

235 months

Friday 12th May 2023
quotequote all
Aretnap said:
Otherwise known as single justice procedure; used in the large majority of speeding cases (and other minor motoring offences) and not at all or of the ordinary.
Yes, dealt with in the exactly the same way as everyone else. BBC journalism is not what it used to be.

Tony1963

5,808 posts

191 months

Friday 12th May 2023
quotequote all
A cop pulls over a car with two archbishops
The cop makes his way up to the window and says, “We’re looking for two child molesters.”
The archbishops look at each other for a moment and turn back to the cop.
“We’ll do it!”

CanAm

13,902 posts

301 months

Friday 12th May 2023
quotequote all
Oceanrower said:
That would be an ecumenical matter…
thumbup

Canon_Fodder

1,775 posts

92 months

Friday 12th May 2023
quotequote all
No SAC offered to His Eminence?

Is that due to His (cough) 'Admin Errors' or some other reason?

Doughnuts around the Abbey car park ini his 'weekend toy' perhaps?

Or talking (to God) on the (big white) telephone while driving?

Or - Heaven forbid - he is a repeat offender?


911Spanker

3,633 posts

45 months

Friday 12th May 2023
quotequote all
He only has a Golf? Presume it is a mapped R with some tints?