Who's fault would it have been?
Who's fault would it have been?
Author
Discussion

cirian75

Original Poster:

5,312 posts

257 months

Friday 20th March
quotequote all
This morning was driving on to the Mancunian way in Manchester.

Its a 30 and I was very close to that speed.

Drove up the on ramp, got on to the Mancunian way, checked my mirror, did the over shoulder blind spot check, a good 5 car lengths between me and the fiesta behind, indicator on, moves to middle lane which really the 1st lane as its a combined on/of ram and I'm going straight on.

I have 90% completed my move into the lane when.

When see a black Volvo going at warp speed coming past in the outside lane, the Blind spot monitor goes off crazy, did not know I had 2 levels until today.

Volvo has his left indicator on, he had been planning a high speed cutting across 2 lane in front of the the fiesta so he could take the of ramp.

Only there was red Vitara now in his way.

He slams on the brakes real hard and dives between the gap.

If had been going any faster than he was he could have had a very hard time not crashing into me.

So who fault would it have been

https://www.google.com/maps/@53.471451,-2.2394148,...

https://www.google.com/maps/@53.471679,-2.2381547,...

https://www.google.com/maps/@53.4721249,-2.2351854...

Edited by cirian75 on Friday 20th March 08:00

GasEngineer

2,244 posts

86 months

Friday 20th March
quotequote all
Blind spot warning usually goes faster if you have your indicator on when it detects a vehicle.

donkmeister

11,793 posts

124 months

Friday 20th March
quotequote all
50:50. You both should have seen the other was aiming for that place on the road, and you both could have taken avoiding action (you staying in the on/off lane OR him staying in the outside lane would have avoided a crash).

Noted he was speeding. Unless he was doing an absolutely mental speed where he was well outside any reasonable range to check before the lane change then that's irrelevant.

A friend of mine rear-ended someone who changed lanes under his nose, who started with the "you must have been speeding" argument. He was (nothing stupid, typical DC speed) and it was ignored. The "didn't look properly and changed lanes into the path of a vehicle" part was more important as a contribution to the crash.

cirian75

Original Poster:

5,312 posts

257 months

Friday 20th March
quotequote all
I have updated my info, I forgot to say I had 90% completed my move in to the lane by the time the Volvo appeared.

Yellow Lizud

2,812 posts

188 months

Friday 20th March
quotequote all
Personally, I'd have read the situation a bit better, worked out the speed of the black Volvo and matched it perfectly, forcing the driver to go straight on.
Would that have been good driving? Of course not, but now we're all forced to drive everywhere at 20mph you have to get your fun when you can.

irc

9,392 posts

160 months

Friday 20th March
quotequote all
I'll vote for the Volvo on the basis the driver was at fault for not getting into the NS lane before the start of his exit slip and not anticipating merging traffic from the on ramp

Bill

57,465 posts

279 months

Friday 20th March
quotequote all
All 3 cars aiming for the same lane, it's on the Volvo for not considering the other more predictable manoeuvres.

OutInTheShed

13,243 posts

50 months

Friday 20th March
quotequote all
cirian75 said:
I have updated my info, I forgot to say I had 90% completed my move in to the lane by the time the Volvo appeared.
Damned Spock beaming volvos down all over the place!

Did you mean you failed to observe the Volvo?

cirian75

Original Poster:

5,312 posts

257 months

Friday 20th March
quotequote all
OutInTheShed said:
cirian75 said:
I have updated my info, I forgot to say I had 90% completed my move in to the lane by the time the Volvo appeared.
Damned Spock beaming volvos down all over the place!

Did you mean you failed to observe the Volvo?
The Volvo was at least x2 the limit, he was really motoring in a 30.

Plain as day his plan was use lane 2 to overtake all of the cars in lane 1 at high speed, and then cut across the cars in lane1 in a single swoop from lane 2, across 1 lane and into the off ramp lane in one go.

He did not take into account that it is a combined on/off ramp would have cars merging into lane 1 who were not doing damn near 70 in a 30

cirian75

Original Poster:

5,312 posts

257 months

Friday 20th March
quotequote all
He did after he got on to the off lane, take off at full pelt again.

Pica-Pica

16,123 posts

108 months

Friday 20th March
quotequote all
50-50, without substantial evidence otherwise. This is a typical motorway scenario, where one car moves from L1 to L2 just aas another car is moving from L3 to L2. Avoidable by both parties
Nowadays when my SatNav says ' move to left on two Miles', I mostly do that. In heavy motorway traffic as it takes all of those 100 or so seconds to negotiate a two lane slotting in movement.( Yeas yours was urban and 30 and they were exceeding that).

cirian75

Original Poster:

5,312 posts

257 months

Friday 20th March
quotequote all
Maybe time to add a rear dash cam to my set up then.

otherwise I would have be screwed.

Gary C

14,771 posts

203 months

Friday 20th March
quotequote all
Lol

The volvo was travelling so fast that it wasn't in view when the manouvre was commenced is what I am reading ?

Volvo's fault and knowing that road, people often do 100+ before diving off and going through red lights on the wrong side of the road.

The dealers are crazy.

BORNXenon

354 posts

8 months

Friday 20th March
quotequote all
I hate that section of road, it's even worse on the other side trying to get on to the Mancunian way from Upper Brook Street. There is only a very short section of road with people trying to get on and people trying to get off at the next junction.

Another section that is a nightmare (although not the fault of the layout) is the M60 exit off the M602 where people drive all the way up to the actual exit in the middle lane and are then surprised when they don't get let in by the people who have been in the correct lane for the last 2 miles. They then anchor up in the live lane and sit there with their indicator on causing absolute mayhem.

cirian75

Original Poster:

5,312 posts

257 months

Friday 20th March
quotequote all
BORNXenon said:
I hate that section of road, it's even worse on the other side trying to get on to the Mancunian way from Upper Brook Street. There is only a very short section of road with people trying to get on and people trying to get off at the next junction.
.
Yup, he knows the exact issue, if you blast down in lane 2 of this raised urban dual carriageway over taking cars in lane 1 approaching this junction you can't see the cars joining if your going to sweep over.


It used to be a 50 with people doing 60 to 70, but it became a 30 several years ago.

48k

16,451 posts

172 months

Friday 20th March
quotequote all
Would you like everybody to say it's the the guys fault to make you feel better?

cirian75

Original Poster:

5,312 posts

257 months

Friday 20th March
quotequote all
48k said:
Would you like everybody to say it's the the guys fault to make you feel better?
Nah, in reality my opinion the blame the case of collision would have been 30/70.

Next time if there's an unusually big gap like today, I'm going to double it before moving out, and assume there's someone who's go miffed with people sticking to 30 in lane 1, so is doing 50 to 70 in lane 2 planning a swoop onto the off ramp.

OIC

336 posts

17 months

Friday 20th March
quotequote all
Highway Code says give way to the right, no?

Insurance would have gone 50:50 as always.

BiB - lots of noise but no prosecutions due to lack of interest probably.

paul_c123

1,928 posts

17 months

Friday 20th March
quotequote all
I'll go with 100% your fault, unless you can prove the Volvo was speeding (which is going to be difficult if you didn't even see it until very late on). Unfortunately for you in this case, it is 100% the responsibility of a driver merging onto a road, to check it is clear. Even if that road is has 2 lanes, and someone pulls from lane 2 to 1 just at the wrong time for you.

KungFuPanda

4,589 posts

194 months

Friday 20th March
quotequote all
I know exactly the junction you’re talking of. You’ve joined heading in the direction of Ancoats and need to get out of lane 1 asap to join the main carriageway otherwise you’re heading off towards London Road.

I usually stay in the slip road until I’m full established and can see the cars in the offside lane in my door mirror prior to changing lane. I wouldn’t have expected any car in lane three to swoop in like you’ve described.