MCN Camera Articles part 2
MCN Camera Articles part 2
Author
Discussion

Flat in Fifth

Original Poster:

48,833 posts

281 months

Wednesday 2nd November 2005
quotequote all
Following on from earlier thread this weeks anti camera article contains a letter from Roads Minister Ladyman admitting that increased use of cameras has directly resulted in a reduction of traffic police. He admits that this means other road offences are not being policed.

But then goes on to say that it's all right as the traffic units are then released onto other duties and the cameras are doing their job for them.

What we've been saying just confirmed by HMG.

You know this inceasingly seems like a Govt which wouldn't mind if it lost the next election.

>> Edited by Flat in Fifth on Wednesday 2nd November 21:32

BliarOut

72,863 posts

269 months

Wednesday 2nd November 2005
quotequote all
I think the pressure is finally starting to get to them

ledfoot

777 posts

282 months

Wednesday 2nd November 2005
quotequote all
Sooner we get rid these labor fookers the better

catso

16,490 posts

297 months

Wednesday 2nd November 2005
quotequote all
The letter, sent to Don Touhig MP, is in response to a letter to Alistair Darling. Stephen Ladyboy's reply is pictured in the paper, the relevant sentence is;

"The importance given to road policing should not be measured by the number of dedicated traffic officers. Speed cameras, which act as a continuous deterrant, actually free up police time for other duties, including other roads policing work."

james_j

3,996 posts

285 months

Thursday 3rd November 2005
quotequote all
They think safety can be automated and, in the name of safety, be a good earner at the same time.