I need some advice...
Author
Discussion

PreacherCain

Original Poster:

27 posts

280 months

Monday 17th July 2006
quotequote all
Morning all. Long-time lurker here, seeking some advice specific to a colleague's situation. Bear with me; I don't know all the details and I rather suspect they're moot, anyway!

The chap concerned was lasered on his way from London to Norwich (don't know which road) and received an NIP/"identify the driver" letter citing him for doing 97 in a 70 limit. no offer of points was made at that time. he filled in the form and returned it, and has just received a Mags' Court summons for the end of this week. Questions:

1) Am I correct to assume that this means a ban's on the cards, or is he more likely looking at a big fine/6 points scenario?

2) He's about to emigrate to Switzerland (as in, next week). Would I be right in telling him that simply trotting off over there and ignoring the whole thing would be a Very Foolish Course of Action if he ever intends to return to the UK?

3) Would you advise that he attends the hearing in person or just takes whatever's coming to him in absentia? As I understand it he's already entered a guilty plea (and doesn't contend innocence in any way). Would it advantage him to turn up in best suit and be thoroughly contrite?

I've already sent him a link to PePiPoo, for all the good it's likely to do him...

Any thoughts/advice very welcome.

prof beard

6,669 posts

257 months

Monday 17th July 2006
quotequote all
PreacherCain said:

I've already sent him a link to PePiPoo, for all the good it's likely to do him...


Strange comment, why do you say that?

PreacherCain

Original Poster:

27 posts

280 months

Monday 17th July 2006
quotequote all
Because my understanding is that, having already entered a guilty plea, his chances of avoiding a thrown book are practically zero. I haven't (touch wood) had occasion to peruse the site thoroughly myself, but my impression was that PePiPoo is primarily concerned with avoiding/de-railing prosecution rather than mitigating the impact of it. Apologies if I'm wrong and bad-mouthing someone.

Touching Cloth

11,706 posts

269 months

Monday 17th July 2006
quotequote all
Some years ago I was done for exactly that speed but pulled up roadside further up the road rather than advised by letter. Didn't attend just filled in form with my plea and was awarded 5 point and something like a £200 fine (can't remember exact amount now but it wasn't overly large just a bit annoying). Certainly wouldn't trot off and ignore it, it's not going to be that bad so not worth the risk of future repurcussion. I would be extremely surprised at a ban as usually those are reserved for over the ton I think, unless there is dangerous driving cited etc. My feeling re attendance was that turning up will take up more of their time and they would probably rather just rattle through the paperwork, might be an incorrect assumption but makes sense in my head.

justinp1

13,363 posts

260 months

Monday 17th July 2006
quotequote all
Touching Cloth said:
Some years ago I was done for exactly that speed but pulled up roadside further up the road rather than advised by letter. Didn't attend just filled in form with my plea and was awarded 5 point and something like a £200 fine (can't remember exact amount now but it wasn't overly large just a bit annoying). Certainly wouldn't trot off and ignore it, it's not going to be that bad so not worth the risk of future repurcussion. I would be extremely surprised at a ban as usually those are reserved for over the ton I think, unless there is dangerous driving cited etc. My feeling re attendance was that turning up will take up more of their time and they would probably rather just rattle through the paperwork, might be an incorrect assumption but makes sense in my head.


I agree. I would have though that in the absence of any other information about the driver or driving then the mags would just be able to exactly by the book. My guess would be 5-6 points plus a £200 fine or thereabouts. I would ring up the court to check with the clerks what the score is though.

As a yardstick, for 92 in a 70 in my absence was given 6 points and £200 fine. I appealed against this and it was deemed too harsh and reduced to 4 points.

Touching Cloth

11,706 posts

269 months

Monday 17th July 2006
quotequote all
justinp1 said:


As a yardstick, for 92 in a 70 in my absence was given 6 points and £200 fine. I appealed against this and it was deemed too harsh and reduced to 4 points.



Blimey that does seem harsh did you still get the £200 as well as 4 points or did it come down as well, I recently got done again 95 in a 70 this time (motorway again) and got away with fixed penalty 3 points and £60....

SS2.

14,712 posts

268 months

Monday 17th July 2006
quotequote all
PreacherCain said:
I haven't (touch wood) had occasion to peruse the site thoroughly myself, but my impression was that PePiPoo is primarily concerned with avoiding/de-railing prosecution rather than mitigating the impact of it. Apologies if I'm wrong and bad-mouthing someone.
If your friend does post his case on Pepipoo, I'm confident that he will be offered constructive advice regarding mitigation...


For reference -
Pepipoo Mission Statement said:
To reveal to the ordinary UK motorist, clearly and concisely, how the police and judiciary deal with allegations of motoring offences in real life, and to provide the information motorists need to defend themselves.

PePiPoo grew out of an ordinary, everyday event - on a Sunday morning in April 2000 a car driver was stopped for speeding on a British motorway. It was the experience of that driver over the following nine months, as the judicial process ground along with little apparent regard for facts or rights, that built the conviction that motorists should know how the law actually works when it comes to speeding. In this site we aim to show you how the system works, and what you can do to defend yourself and obtain a just result.

Important Notice
PePiPoo do not condone breaking the law. We simply believe that motorists have the right to be treated fairly, in accordance with normal legal principles and with respect for their rights, and that allegations of motoring offences, such as speeding, should not be treated simply as an administrative issue leading efficiently and inevitably to a conviction.


deva link

26,934 posts

275 months

Tuesday 18th July 2006
quotequote all
Touching Cloth said:
justinp1 said:


As a yardstick, for 92 in a 70 in my absence was given 6 points and £200 fine. I appealed against this and it was deemed too harsh and reduced to 4 points.



Blimey that does seem harsh did you still get the £200 as well as 4 points or did it come down as well, I recently got done again 95 in a 70 this time (motorway again) and got away with fixed penalty 3 points and £60....

I understood that the guidelines are up to 96 is a fixed penalty.

deva link

26,934 posts

275 months

Tuesday 18th July 2006
quotequote all
PreacherCain said:
Because my understanding is that, having already entered a guilty plea, his chances of avoiding a thrown book are practically zero. I haven't (touch wood) had occasion to peruse the site thoroughly myself, but my impression was that PePiPoo is primarily concerned with avoiding/de-railing prosecution rather than mitigating the impact of it. Apologies if I'm wrong and bad-mouthing someone.

It's gone too far already to be able to do much to mitigate this (other than a full blown challange of the offence itself). Now he's been summonsed then presumeably if he didn't respond by letter or in person then the presumeably the court would issue a warrant for his arrest. That would make re-entry into the UK somewhat nerve-wracking!

If he was eariler in the process, at the S172 or NIP phase, then he perhaps could have submitted his Swiss address and maybe it would have gone away.

justinp1

13,363 posts

260 months

Tuesday 18th July 2006
quotequote all
deva link said:
Touching Cloth said:
justinp1 said:


As a yardstick, for 92 in a 70 in my absence was given 6 points and £200 fine. I appealed against this and it was deemed too harsh and reduced to 4 points.



Blimey that does seem harsh did you still get the £200 as well as 4 points or did it come down as well, I recently got done again 95 in a 70 this time (motorway again) and got away with fixed penalty 3 points and £60....

I understood that the guidelines are up to 96 is a fixed penalty.


Only if you accept your roadside shafting...

SS2.

14,712 posts

268 months

Tuesday 18th July 2006
quotequote all
justinp1 said:
deva link said:
Touching Cloth said:
justinp1 said:


As a yardstick, for 92 in a 70 in my absence was given 6 points and £200 fine. I appealed against this and it was deemed too harsh and reduced to 4 points.



Blimey that does seem harsh did you still get the £200 as well as 4 points or did it come down as well, I recently got done again 95 in a 70 this time (motorway again) and got away with fixed penalty 3 points and £60....

I understood that the guidelines are up to 96 is a fixed penalty.


Only if you accept your roadside shafting...


Upon conviction, the current Magistrates' Sentencing Guidelines for 26mph over in a 70 limit are 4-5 points or a short period of disqualification (upto 42 days, IIRC).

daniboy

215 posts

249 months

Tuesday 18th July 2006
quotequote all
When you get banned they dont give you a chance of pleading guilty by letter, you have to go to court because they take your licence and mark it i think cant remember, but i know if you can plead guilty by letter its no biggie.

PreacherCain

Original Poster:

27 posts

280 months

Tuesday 18th July 2006
quotequote all
Thanks for all the constructive advice, and also for clearing up my misunderstanding of PePiPoo's purpose/mission. As I said, no offence was intended.

Stubby Pete

2,488 posts

276 months

Tuesday 18th July 2006
quotequote all
I'd recomment the Guilty by Post option, explaining that he is no longer a UK resident. I can't beleive that the Mag's would waste time and paperwork on a ban if there is an address to send a fine.