Jailed for Life
Author
Discussion

Broccers

Original Poster:

3,237 posts

283 months

Tuesday 26th September 2006
quotequote all
Do people only live 4 years these day ?

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/so

Life sentence for banned driver

Help was called only after Kirsty was taken away from the crash scene
A banned driver who did not call 999 when his girlfriend was fatally hurt in a crash has been jailed for life for her manslaughter.
Kirsty Cash, 17, died after Andrew Bennett, 20, crashed a Subaru Impreza on the outskirts of Sheffield in April.

Sheffield Crown Court heard Miss Cash might have lived, but Bennett failed to call an ambulance for 45 minutes.

Bennett, from Sheffield, admitted manslaughter, perverting the course of justice and driving while disqualified.

vonhosen

40,597 posts

247 months

Tuesday 26th September 2006
quotequote all
A life sentence just means an indeterminate custodial sentence, it is no indication of the time to actually be served. A judge can set a minimum tariff with that life sentence.

pikey

7,704 posts

314 months

Tuesday 26th September 2006
quotequote all
vonhosen said:
A life sentence just means an indeterminate custodial sentence, it is no indication of the time to actually be served. A judge can set a minimum tariff with that life sentence.
Didn't know that.

pikey

7,704 posts

314 months

Tuesday 26th September 2006
quotequote all
< been thinking >

So why don't they call it "4.5 years"? Why call it "life... with a minimum of 4.5 years".

vonhosen

40,597 posts

247 months

Tuesday 26th September 2006
quotequote all
pikey said:
< been thinking >

So why don't they call it "4.5 years"? Why call it "life... with a minimum of 4.5 years".


Because when they set the minimum tariff there is no guarantee of you being released then, that's just the earliest you can apply for parole.

Applying for parole doesn't mean you'll get it.

Jared_m

252 posts

252 months

Tuesday 26th September 2006
quotequote all
vonhosen said:
Applying for parole doesn't mean you'll get it.


No, it guarantees it nuts

martind

2,138 posts

257 months

Tuesday 26th September 2006
quotequote all
pikey said:
< been thinking >

So why don't they call it "4.5 years"? Why call it "life... with a minimum of 4.5 years".

I think it something to do with when you have served your sentence of say 4.5 years , you have served your time & are free. With a life sentence of 4.5 years , when freed you are on parole for life & so another crime could send you back for life.

vonhosen

40,597 posts

247 months

Tuesday 26th September 2006
quotequote all

LotusNova

512 posts

247 months

Tuesday 26th September 2006
quotequote all
vonhosen said:


Interesting link. The phrase 'Public Protection' is written multiple times. Wrt consequences of criminal behaviour, I put a higher priority on an effective deterrent to avoid a repeat behaviour (or segregation from society if a realistic deterrent is not available), rather than on punishment for what's happened (still important, but we can't change the past - and this should not be the primary driver, even though it is part of the deterrent itself). Just MHO.

In this case, there does seem to be a possibility that the person involved could be reintegrated into society along with a high risk of a repeat offence. Am I missing something?

pikey

7,704 posts

314 months

Tuesday 26th September 2006
quotequote all
vonhosen said:
That's a good link. Thanks. I think it was the media's use of "life" that confused me.